Sangwoo Tak1, Rickie R Davis, Geoffrey M Calvert. 1. Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226, USA. stak@cdc.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To estimate the prevalence of workplace noise exposure and use of hearing protection devices (HPDs) at noisy work, NIOSH analyzed 1999-2004 data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). METHODS: A total of 9,275 currently employed workers aged > or =16 years were included in the weighted analysis. Hazardous workplace noise exposure was defined as self-reported exposure to noise at their current job that was so loud that the respondent had to speak in a raised voice to be heard. Industry and occupation were determined based on the respondent's current place and type of work. RESULTS: Twenty-two million US workers (17%) reported exposure to hazardous workplace noise. The weighted prevalence of workplace noise exposure was highest for mining (76%, SE = 7.0) followed by lumber/wood product manufacturing (55%, SE = 2.5). High-risk occupations included repair and maintenance, motor vehicle operators, and construction trades. Overall, 34% of the estimated 22 million US workers reporting hazardous workplace exposure reported non-use of HPDs. The proportion of noise-exposed workers who reported non-use of HPDs was highest for healthcare and social services (73.7%, SE = 8.1), followed by educational services (55.5%). DISCUSSION: Hearing loss prevention and intervention programs should be targeted at those industries and occupations identified to have a high prevalence of workplace noise exposure and those industries with the highest proportion of noise-exposed workers who reported non-use of HPDs. Published 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: To estimate the prevalence of workplace noise exposure and use of hearing protection devices (HPDs) at noisy work, NIOSH analyzed 1999-2004 data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). METHODS: A total of 9,275 currently employed workers aged > or =16 years were included in the weighted analysis. Hazardous workplace noise exposure was defined as self-reported exposure to noise at their current job that was so loud that the respondent had to speak in a raised voice to be heard. Industry and occupation were determined based on the respondent's current place and type of work. RESULTS: Twenty-two million US workers (17%) reported exposure to hazardous workplace noise. The weighted prevalence of workplace noise exposure was highest for mining (76%, SE = 7.0) followed by lumber/wood product manufacturing (55%, SE = 2.5). High-risk occupations included repair and maintenance, motor vehicle operators, and construction trades. Overall, 34% of the estimated 22 million US workers reporting hazardous workplace exposure reported non-use of HPDs. The proportion of noise-exposed workers who reported non-use of HPDs was highest for healthcare and social services (73.7%, SE = 8.1), followed by educational services (55.5%). DISCUSSION: Hearing loss prevention and intervention programs should be targeted at those industries and occupations identified to have a high prevalence of workplace noise exposure and those industries with the highest proportion of noise-exposed workers who reported non-use of HPDs. Published 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Robyn R M Gershon; Martin F Sherman; Lori A Magda; Halley E Riley; Tara P McAlexander; Richard Neitzel Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: M Jenae Lowe; David S Yantek; Junyi Yang; Kevin C Schuster; Jessie J Mechling Journal: Noise Control Eng J Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 0.466
Authors: Hari M Bharadwaj; Salwa Masud; Golbarg Mehraei; Sarah Verhulst; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Geoffrey M Calvert; Sara E Luckhaupt; Aaron Sussell; James M Dahlhamer; Brian W Ward Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Laura Hallett; Marcus Tatum; Geb Thomas; Sinan Sousan; Kirsten Koehler; Thomas Peters Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.155