Literature DB >> 14665813

Impact of OSHA final rule--recording hearing loss: an analysis of an industrial audiometric dataset.

Peter M Rabinowitz1, Martin Slade, Christine Dixon-Ernst, Kanta Sircar, Mark Cullen.   

Abstract

The 2003 Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Occupational Injury and Illness Recording and Reporting Final Rule changed the definition of recordable work-related hearing loss. We performed a study of the Alcoa Inc. audiometric database to evaluate the impact of this new rule. The 2003 rule increased the rate of potentially recordable hearing loss events from 0.2% to 1.6% per year. A total of 68.6% of potentially recordable cases had American Academy of Audiology/American Medical Association (AAO/AMA) hearing impairment at the time of recordability. On average, recordable loss occurred after onset of impairment, whereas the non-age-corrected 10-dB standard threshold shift (STS) usually preceded impairment. The OSHA Final Rule will significantly increase recordable cases of occupational hearing loss. The new case definition is usually accompanied by AAO/AMA hearing impairment. Other, more sensitive metrics should therefore be used for early detection and prevention of hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14665813      PMCID: PMC3842165          DOI: 10.1097/01.jom.0000100040.45929.42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  2 in total

1.  Occupational injury and illness recording and reporting requirements. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2002-07-01

2.  Noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  P M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 3.292

  2 in total
  7 in total

1.  Usability of a daily noise exposure monitoring device for industrial workers.

Authors:  Steven C Williams; Peter M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-03-29

2.  Tracking occupational hearing loss across global industries: a comparative analysis of metrics.

Authors:  Peter M Rabinowitz; Deron Galusha; Michael F McTague; Martin D Slade; James C Wesdock; Christine Dixon-Ernst
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.867

3.  Effect of daily noise exposure monitoring on annual rates of hearing loss in industrial workers.

Authors:  Peter M Rabinowitz; Deron Galusha; Sharon R Kirsche; Mark R Cullen; Martin D Slade; Christine Dixon-Ernst
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Prevalence of workers with shifts in hearing by industry: a comparison of OSHA and NIOSH Hearing Shift Criteria.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Masterson; Marie Haring Sweeney; James A Deddens; Christa L Themann; David K Wall
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.162

5.  Post-processing analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions to detect 4 kHz-notch hearing impairment--a pilot study.

Authors:  Giovanna Zimatore; Anna Rita Fetoni; Gaetano Paludetti; Marta Cavagnaro; Maria Vittoria Podda; Diana Troiani
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-06

6.  Progressive Asymmetry in Occupational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study With a 15-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Vagner Antonio Rodrigues da Silva; Maria Martinez Kruchewsc; Joel Lavinsky; Henrique Furlan Pauna; Alexandre Caixeta Guimaraes; Arthur Menino Castilho; Alexandre Scalli Mathias Duarte; Agricio Nubiato Crespo
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.017

Review 7.  Occupational and environmental health in the aluminum industry: key points for health practitioners.

Authors:  James C Wesdock; Ian M F Arnold
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.162

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.