Literature DB >> 23373740

Impact of daily noise exposure monitoring on occupational noise exposures in manufacturing workers.

Michael F McTague1, Deron Galusha, Christine Dixon-Ernst, Sharon R Kirsche, Martin D Slade, Mark R Cullen, Peter M Rabinowitz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite the use of hearing protection devices (HPDs), noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) remains one of the most prevalent occupational conditions. A new technology allows for daily monitoring of noise exposures under HPDs. We report on an intervention employing the voluntary use of this technology in a worksite setting.
DESIGN: Volunteers were fitted with a device allowing them to monitor noise exposure under their hearing protection on a daily basis. The trends in noise exposures for individuals who completed at least six months of the intervention were analysed. STUDY SAMPLE: Recruitment occurred at three manufacturing facilities, with 127 workers enrolling and 66 workers actively using the device during their work shifts.
RESULTS: Among volunteers downloading regularly, the percentage of daily exposures in excess of the OSHA action level (85 dBA) decreased from 14% to 8%, while the percentage of daily exposures in excess of 90 dBA decreased from 4% to less than 2%.
CONCLUSION: Initial results from this longitudinal study indicate that volunteers find daily noise exposure monitoring to be feasible, and that workers who monitor daily are able to reduce exposures. The results of subject adherence shed light on the challenges and possibilities of worksite interventions for health and safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23373740      PMCID: PMC3709598          DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2012.743047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  13 in total

1.  Usability of a daily noise exposure monitoring device for industrial workers.

Authors:  Steven C Williams; Peter M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-03-29

2.  A multi-component intervention to promote hearing protector use among construction workers.

Authors:  Noah S Seixas; Rick Neitzel; Bert Stover; Lianne Sheppard; Bill Daniell; Jane Edelson; Hendrika Meischke
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Do ambient noise exposure levels predict hearing loss in a modern industrial cohort?

Authors:  P M Rabinowitz; D Galusha; C Dixon-Ernst; M D Slade; M R Cullen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  The global burden of occupational noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Deborah Imel Nelson; Robert Y Nelson; Marisol Concha-Barrientos; Marilyn Fingerhut
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.

Authors:  Richard Neitzel; Sebrina Somers; Noah Seixas
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2006-06-16

6.  Prevalence of hearing loss and work-related noise-induced hearing loss in Michigan.

Authors:  Martha Stanbury; Ann P Rafferty; Kenneth Rosenman
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.162

7.  Hearing difficulty attributable to employment by industry and occupation: an analysis of the National Health Interview Survey--United States, 1997 to 2003.

Authors:  SangWoo Tak; Geoffrey M Calvert
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.162

8.  Role of continuous monitoring in a hearing conservation program.

Authors:  Kevin Michael; Ed Tougaw; Ronda Wilkinson
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.867

9.  Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data.

Authors:  E H Berger; J R Franks; A Behar; J G Casali; C Dixon-Ernst; R W Kieper; C J Merry; B T Mozo; C W Nixon; D Ohlin; J D Royster; L H Royster
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Interventions to prevent occupational noise induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Jos H Verbeek; Erik Kateman; Thais C Morata; Wout Dreschler; Bas Sorgdrager
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08
View more
  7 in total

1.  Methods for evaluating temporal trends in noise exposure.

Authors:  R L Neitzel; D Galusha; C Dixon-Ernst; P M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Efficacy of technology-based interventions to increase the use of hearing protections among adolescent farmworkers.

Authors:  Khalid M Khan; Sydney S Evans; Sylvanna L Bielko; Diane S Rohlman
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Hearing Protector Attenuation and Noise Exposure Among Metal Manufacturing Workers.

Authors:  Stephanie K Sayler; Peter M Rabinowitz; Deron Galusha; Kan Sun; Richard L Neitzel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  Disorders induced by direct occupational exposure to noise: Systematic review.

Authors:  Andrea Domingo-Pueyo; Javier Sanz-Valero; Carmina Wanden-Berghe
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

5.  Does occupational noise matter amongst manufacturing (small and medium enterprises) workers? Empirical evidence from Magaba, Mbare, Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Miston Mapuranga; Eugine T Maziriri; Ralebitso K Letshaba; Anos Chitamba
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2020-03-03

6.  Recent advances in hearing conservation programmes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nomfundo F Moroe; Katijah Khoza-Shangase
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2020-03-03

7.  Generation Mechanism and Prediction Model for Low Frequency Noise Induced by Energy Dissipating Submerged Jets during Flood Discharge from a High Dam.

Authors:  Jijian Lian; Wenjiao Zhang; Qizhong Guo; Fang Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.