Literature DB >> 22457268

Modified Look-Locker T1 evaluation using Bloch simulations: human and phantom validation.

Neville D Gai1, Christian Stehning, Marcelo Nacif, David A Bluemke.   

Abstract

Modified Look-Locker imaging is frequently used for T(1) mapping of the myocardium. However, the specific effect of various MRI parameters (e.g., encoding scheme, modifications of flip angle, heart rate, T(2), and inversion times) on the accuracy of T(1) measurement has not been studied through Bloch simulations. In this work, modified Look-Locker imaging was characterized through a numerical solution for Bloch equations. MRI sequence parameters that may affect T(1) accuracy were systematically varied in the simulation. For validation, phantoms were constructed with various T(2) and T(1) times and compared with Bloch equation simulations. Human volunteers were also evaluated with various pulse sequences parameters to assess the validity of the numerical simulations. There was close agreement between simulated T(1) times and T(1) times measured in phantoms and volunteers. Lower T(2) times (i.e., <30 ms) resulted in errors greater than 5% for T(1) determination. Increasing maximum inversion time value improved T(1) accuracy particularly for precontrast myocardial T(1). Balanced steady-state free precession k space centric encoding improved accuracy for short T(1) times (post gadolinium), but linear encoding provided improved accuracy for precontrast T(1) values. Lower flip angles are preferred if the signal-to-noise ratio is sufficiently high. Bloch simulations for modified Look-Locker imaging provide an accurate method to comprehensively quantify the effect of pulse sequence parameters on T(1) accuracy. As an alternative to otherwise lengthy phantom studies or human studies, such simulations may be useful to optimize the modified Look-Locker imaging sequence and compare differences in T(1)-derived measurements from different scanners or institutions.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22457268      PMCID: PMC3826815          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  12 in total

1.  Characterization and reduction of the transient response in steady-state MR imaging.

Authors:  B A Hargreaves; S S Vasanawala; J M Pauly; D G Nishimura
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Optimization and validation of a fully-integrated pulse sequence for modified look-locker inversion-recovery (MOLLI) T1 mapping of the heart.

Authors:  Daniel R Messroghli; Andreas Greiser; Mirko Fröhlich; Rainer Dietz; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  SSFP signal with finite RF pulses.

Authors:  Oliver Bieri; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Susceptibility-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging detects human myocardium supplied by a stenotic coronary artery without a contrast agent.

Authors:  Christian M Wacker; Andreas W Hartlep; Stefan Pfleger; Lothar R Schad; Georg Ertl; Wolfgang R Bauer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-03-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  T2* magnetic resonance and myocardial iron in thalassemia.

Authors:  Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Improved in vivo measurement of myocardial transverse relaxation with 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jared Guthrie Cobb; Cynthia B Paschal
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high-resolution T1 mapping of the heart.

Authors:  Daniel R Messroghli; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Sebastian Kozerke; David M Higgins; Mohan U Sivananthan; John P Ridgway
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Evaluation of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in heart failure with cardiac magnetic resonance contrast-enhanced T1 mapping.

Authors:  Leah Iles; Heinz Pfluger; Arintaya Phrommintikul; Joshi Cherayath; Pelin Aksit; Sandeep N Gupta; David M Kaye; Andrew J Taylor
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Myocardial extravascular extracellular volume fraction measurement by gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance in humans: slow infusion versus bolus.

Authors:  Erik B Schelbert; Stephen M Testa; Christopher G Meier; William J Ceyrolles; Joshua E Levenson; Alexander J Blair; Peter Kellman; Bobby L Jones; Daniel R Ludwig; David Schwartzman; Sanjeev G Shroff; Timothy C Wong
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Effect of Gd-DTPA-BMA on blood and myocardial T1 at 1.5T and 3T in humans.

Authors:  Puneet Sharma; Josh Socolow; Salil Patel; Roderic I Pettigrew; John N Oshinski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  39 in total

1.  Influence of spatial resolution and contrast agent dosage on myocardial T1 relaxation times.

Authors:  Edyta Blaszczyk; Agnieszka Töpper; Luisa Schmacht; Felix Wanke; Andreas Greiser; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: Technical Overview and Initial Results.

Authors:  Yuchi Liu; Jesse Hamilton; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-12

3.  Accurate, precise, simultaneous myocardial T1 and T2 mapping using a radial sequence with inversion recovery and T2 preparation.

Authors:  Jiaxin Shao; Ziwu Zhou; Kim-Lien Nguyen; J Paul Finn; Peng Hu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 4.  Advancement of echocardiography for surveillance of iron overload cardiomyopathy: comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Jason Zimmerman; Douglas R Rosing; Yukitaka Shizukuda
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2021-03-26

Review 5.  Towards accurate and precise T 1 and extracellular volume mapping in the myocardium: a guide to current pitfalls and their solutions.

Authors:  Donnie Cameron; Vassilios S Vassiliou; David M Higgins; Peter D Gatehouse
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Myocardial T1 mapping at 3.0 tesla using an inversion recovery spoiled gradient echo readout and bloch equation simulation with slice profile correction (BLESSPC) T1 estimation algorithm.

Authors:  Jiaxin Shao; Stanislas Rapacchi; Kim-Lien Nguyen; Peng Hu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Dose correction for post-contrast T1 mapping of the heart: the MESA study.

Authors:  Neville D Gai; Veit Sandfort; Songtao Liu; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Adiabatic inversion pulses for myocardial T1 mapping.

Authors:  Peter Kellman; Daniel A Herzka; Michael Schacht Hansen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Left ventricular extracellular volume expansion does not predict recurrence of atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation.

Authors:  Suvai Gunasekaran; Daniel C Lee; Bradley P Knight; Jeremy D Collins; Lexiaozi Fan; Amar Trivedi; Ann B Ragin; James C Carr; Rod S Passman; Daniel Kim
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Single breath-hold 3D cardiac T1 mapping using through-time spiral GRAPPA.

Authors:  Yong Chen; Wei-Ching Lo; Jesse I Hamilton; Kestutis Barkauskas; Haris Saybasili; Katherine L Wright; Joshua Batesole; Mark A Griswold; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.