Literature DB >> 22453854

Shifts in national rates of inpatient prolapse surgery emphasize current coding inadequacies.

Sarah L Bradley1, Alison C Weidner, Nazema Y Siddiqui, Mihir P Gandhi, Jennifer M Wu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: : This study aimed to assess national rates, types, and routes of inpatient surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States in 1998 compared to those in 2007.
METHODS: : We used the 1998 and 2007 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, which represents a stratified, random sample of discharge data from US hospitals. We included women 20 years and older who underwent surgery for prolapse based on diagnosis and procedure codes of the International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification. We calculated the number of women undergoing surgery each year and incidence rates.
RESULTS: : The total number of women undergoing prolapse surgeries was 92,503 in 1998 versus 113,646 in 2007. The incidence rate of surgery increased slightly, from 90.8 to 100.9 per 100,000 women, respectively. The most common procedure was hysterectomy, representing approximately half of prolapse surgeries in 1998 and 2007. Suspension procedures accounted for 18.8% of procedures in 2007, an increase from 6.1% in 1998. Surgeries performed via a minimally invasive route increased from 4.8% in 1998 to 9.4% in 2007. However, it was difficult to determine the route for many procedures based on current ICD-9 codes. There were also no codes that specifically designated mesh kit procedures or minimally invasive sacrocolpopexies.
CONCLUSIONS: : During the last decade, the rate of inpatient prolapse surgery has slightly increased. The proportion of suspension procedures has increased; however, it is difficult to determine the route of these procedures based on current ICD-9 codes. These findings emphasize that ICD-9 procedure codes have not kept up with changes in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22453854      PMCID: PMC4353384          DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182254cf1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  14 in total

1.  Age adjustment using the 2000 projected U.S. population.

Authors:  R J Klein; C A Schoenborn
Journal:  Healthy People 2010 Stat Notes       Date:  2001-01

2.  Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997.

Authors:  Sarah Hamilton Boyles; Anne M Weber; Leslie Meyn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Ray Garry
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 5.237

4.  The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observations and future projections.

Authors:  K M Luber; S Boero; J Y Choe
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Ambulatory procedures for female pelvic floor disorders in the United States.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Erekson; Vrishali V Lopes; Christina A Raker; Vivian W Sung
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors.

Authors:  E C Samuelsson; F T Victor; G Tibblin; K F Svärdsudd
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women.

Authors:  Ingrid Nygaard; Matthew D Barber; Kathryn L Burgio; Kimberly Kenton; Susan Meikle; Joseph Schaffer; Cathie Spino; William E Whitehead; Jennifer Wu; Debra J Brody
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Effect of weight change on natural history of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Bela I Kudish; Cheryl B Iglesia; Robert J Sokol; Barbara Cochrane; Holly E Richter; Joseph Larson; Susan L Hendrix; Barbara V Howard
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Ageing populations: the challenges ahead.

Authors:  Kaare Christensen; Gabriele Doblhammer; Roland Rau; James W Vaupel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  7 in total

1.  Concomitant apical suspensory procedures in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse in the United States in 2011.

Authors:  Gina M Northington; Catherine O Hudson; Deborah R Karp; Sarah A Huber
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Pelvic organ prolapse surgical management in Portugal and FDA safety communication have an impact on vaginal mesh.

Authors:  Teresa Mascarenhas; Miguel Mascarenhas-Saraiva; Amélia Ricon-Ferraz; Paula Nogueira; Fernando Lopes; Alberto Freitas
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Cumulative Incidence of a Subsequent Surgery After Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Procedure.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Alexis A Dieter; Virginia Pate; Michele Jonsson Funk
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Pelvic floor symptoms and bone mineral density in women undergoing osteoporosis evaluation.

Authors:  Holly E Richter; Sarah L Morgan; Jonathan L Gleason; Jeff M Szychowski; Patricia S Goode; Kathryn L Burgio
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Trends in use of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Michele Jonsson Funk; Autumn L Edenfield; Virginia Pate; Anthony G Visco; Alison C Weidner; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Responsiveness and minimally important difference of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Heidi S Harvie; Amanda A Honeycutt; Simon J Neuwahl; Matthew D Barber; Holly E Richter; Anthony G Visco; Vivian W Sung; Jonathan P Shepherd; Rebecca G Rogers; Sharon Jakus-Waldman; Donna Mazloomdoost
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 10.693

7.  Identification of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-IUGA Revised (PISQ-IR) Cutoff Scores for Impaired Sexual Function in Women with Pelvic Floor Disorders.

Authors:  Magdalena Emilia Grzybowska; Konrad Futyma; Dariusz Wydra
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.