Literature DB >> 9988790

Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors.

E C Samuelsson1, F T Victor, G Tibblin, K F Svärdsudd.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to study the prevalence of genital prolapse and possible related factors in a general population of women 20 to 59 years of age. STUDY
DESIGN: Of 641 eligible women in a primary health care district, 487 (76%) answered a questionnaire and accepted an invitation to a gynecologic health examination.
RESULTS: The prevalence of any degree of prolapse was 30.8%. Only 2% of all women had a prolapse that reached the introitus. In a set of multivariate analyses, age (P <.0001), parity (P <.0001), and pelvic floor muscle strength (P <.01)-and among parous women, the maximum birth weight (P <.01)-were significantly and independently associated with presence of prolapse, whereas the woman's weight and sustained hysterectomy were not.
CONCLUSIONS: Signs of genital prolapse are frequently found in the female general population but are seldom symptomatic. Of factors associated with genital prolapse found in this study, pelvic floor muscle strength appears to be the only one that could be affected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9988790     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70203-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  160 in total

Review 1.  Management of genital prolapse.

Authors:  Ranee Thakar; Stuart Stanton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-25

2.  Renal failure secondary to uterine prolapse.

Authors:  S V Chitale; N A Burgess; R Warren
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Validation of Persian version of the Prolapse Quality-of-Life questionnaire (P-QOL).

Authors:  Marzieh Nojomi; G Alessandro Digesu; Vik Khullar; Negar Morovatdar; Ladan Haghighi; Mansoureh Alirezaei; Steven Swift
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Genital prolapse in women.

Authors:  Joseph Loze Onwude
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2012-03-14

5.  Comparative analysis of pelvic ligaments: a biomechanics study.

Authors:  Géraldine Rivaux; Chrystèle Rubod; Bruno Dedet; Mathias Brieu; Boris Gabriel; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Biomechanical properties of prolapsed or non-prolapsed vaginal tissue: impact on genital prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Clay Jean-Charles; Chrystèle Rubod; Mathias Brieu; Malik Boukerrou; Jean Fasel; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Short-term natural history in women with symptoms indicative of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Ann Miedel; Marion Ek; Gunilla Tegerstedt; Marianne Mæhle-Schmidt; Olof Nyrén; Margareta Hammarström
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Changing trends of surgical approaches for uterine prolapse: an 11-year population-based nationwide descriptive study.

Authors:  Ming-Ping Wu; Cheng-Yu Long; Kuan-Hui Huang; Chin-Chen Chu; Ching-Chung Liang; Chao-Hsiun Tang
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Preoperative quality of life questionnaires are an adequate tool to select women with genital prolapse for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Enora Laas; Mattieu Haddad; Joël Muhlstein; Sofiane Bendifallah; Marcos Ballester; Emile Darai
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Symptomatic and quality of life outcomes after site-specific fascial reattachment for pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Abdalla M Fayyad; Emma Redhead; Noveen Awan; Maria Kyrgiou; Sanjeev Prashar; Simon R Hill
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.