Literature DB >> 12548203

Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997.

Sarah Hamilton Boyles1, Anne M Weber, Leslie Meyn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to describe national rates of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. STUDY
DESIGN: We used the National Hospital Discharge Survey, a federal database that samples inpatient hospitals in the United States. Data from 1979 to 1997 were analyzed for diagnoses and procedures coded with the ICD-9-CM classification system. Age-adjusted rates were calculated by using the 1990 census population and compared for change over time by using the Score test for linear trend.
RESULTS: Approximately 200,000 women undergo inpatient procedures for prolapse in the United States each year, ranging from 165,000 in 1988 to 226,000 in 1979. There was a significant decrease in the overall age-adjusted rate of procedures performed over the study period, from 2.2 to 1.5 procedures per 1000 women (P =.01). The rate of prolapse procedures for women younger than 50 years decreased by more than half (1.9 to 0.8 per 1000 women, P <.001), whereas the rate remained stable in women who were aged 50 years and older (2.7 to 3.3 per 1000 women, P =.5).
CONCLUSION: Prolapse procedures are performed very frequently in the United States, although the rate has decreased slightly over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12548203     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2003.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  152 in total

1.  Local reaction to the different meshes at the vesicovaginal space in rabbit model.

Authors:  Kun Zhang; JinSong Han; Ying Yao; Junfang Yang; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Factors associated with exposure of transvaginally placed polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Karen P Gold; Renee M Ward; Carl W Zimmerman; Daniel H Biller; Shawn McGuinn; James C Slaughter; Roger R Dmochowski
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial of SIS graft versus traditional colporrhaphy.

Authors:  Paulo Cezar Feldner; Rodrigo Aquino Castro; Luiz Antonio Cipolotti; Carlos Antonio Delroy; Marair Gracio Ferreira Sartori; Manoel João Batista Castello Girão
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Vaginal delivery and pelvic floor dysfunction: current evidence and implications for future research.

Authors:  M A T Bortolini; H P Drutz; D Lovatsis; M Alarab
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Pessary use in pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Keisha A Jones; Oz Harmanli
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010

6.  Introducing a true minimally invasive meshless and dissectionless anchoring system for pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Masha Tsivian; Adi Y Weintraub; Menahem Neuman; Alex Tsivian
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  The rectovaginal septum: visible on magnetic resonance images of women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome (Müllerian agenesis).

Authors:  Markus Huebner; Katharina Rall; Sara Yvonne Brucker; Christl Reisenauer; Katja Claudia Siegmann-Luz; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve.

Authors:  Mohamed N Akl; Jaime B Long; Dobie L Giles; Jeffrey L Cornella; Paul D Pettit; Anita H Chen; Paul M Magtibay
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Vaginal pressure during lifting, floor exercises, jogging, and use of hydraulic exercise machines.

Authors:  Katharine K O'Dell; Abraham N Morse; Sybil L Crawford; Allison Howard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-05-22

10.  Pelvic floor consequences of cesarean delivery on maternal request in women with a single birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Julie S Ivy; Divya A Patel; Sejal N Patel; Dean G Smith; Scott B Ransom; Dee Fenner; John O L Delancey
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.