Linda S Burkett1, Jennifer Makin2, Mary Ackenbom2, Amanda Artsen2, Megan Bradley2. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (all authors).. Electronic address: burkettls@upmc.edu. 2. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (all authors).
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To establish face and construct validity for a novel variation of American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology "Flowerpot Model" for transvaginal hysterectomy (TVH) surgical simulation with improved vesicovaginal dissection during surgical education simulation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional face and construct validation study using the "Flowerpot Model." The vesicovaginal dissection plane was modified to include additional felt and balloon materials to simulate the bladder. SETTING: Single academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen residents and fellows, postgraduate year (PGY) 2 to 6, subdivided into junior (n = 8) with ≤10 prior TVH surgeries and senior groups (n = 6) with >10 prior TVH surgeries performed. INTERVENTIONS: All subjects watched a brief introductory video and then were filmed simulating a TVH. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For face validity, subjects completed an anatomic checklist and pre/post simulation satisfaction survey. For construct validation, 2 independent, blinded expert surgeons (M.A. and J.M.) graded films using the Global Rating Scale of Operative Performance (GRS). Primary outcome was mean GRS between groups. The junior group consisted of PGY 2 to 3 with ≤ 10 prior TVH, median 7.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 6.75) and senior group PGY 3 to 6 with >10 TVH, median 19 (IQR 10) (p <.01). Subjects were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with bladder and anterior peritoneal fold simulation (92%) and found vesicovaginal dissection "realistic" (100%). GRS score was significantly different between groups (juniors, 19.5 [IQR 5] vs seniors, 28.5 [IQR 8.5]; p = .048). Intergrader correlation was high (ρ = 0.87, p <.01). Surgeon volume of prior TVH was not significantly correlated to average GRS score, ρ = 0.49 (p = .10). The model improved comfort and confidence scores in the junior group more than senior group (p = .04), but senior group still had higher post simulation confidence scores than the junior group (p = .02). CONCLUSION: Face and construct validity with the modified Flowerpot Model was demonstrated. This low fidelity model is capable of simulation of a TVH with a novel vesicovaginal dissection. Prior surgical experience was not correlated to GRS score or time to procedure completion.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To establish face and construct validity for a novel variation of American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology "Flowerpot Model" for transvaginal hysterectomy (TVH) surgical simulation with improved vesicovaginal dissection during surgical education simulation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional face and construct validation study using the "Flowerpot Model." The vesicovaginal dissection plane was modified to include additional felt and balloon materials to simulate the bladder. SETTING: Single academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen residents and fellows, postgraduate year (PGY) 2 to 6, subdivided into junior (n = 8) with ≤10 prior TVH surgeries and senior groups (n = 6) with >10 prior TVH surgeries performed. INTERVENTIONS: All subjects watched a brief introductory video and then were filmed simulating a TVH. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For face validity, subjects completed an anatomic checklist and pre/post simulation satisfaction survey. For construct validation, 2 independent, blinded expert surgeons (M.A. and J.M.) graded films using the Global Rating Scale of Operative Performance (GRS). Primary outcome was mean GRS between groups. The junior group consisted of PGY 2 to 3 with ≤ 10 prior TVH, median 7.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 6.75) and senior group PGY 3 to 6 with >10 TVH, median 19 (IQR 10) (p <.01). Subjects were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with bladder and anterior peritoneal fold simulation (92%) and found vesicovaginal dissection "realistic" (100%). GRS score was significantly different between groups (juniors, 19.5 [IQR 5] vs seniors, 28.5 [IQR 8.5]; p = .048). Intergrader correlation was high (ρ = 0.87, p <.01). Surgeon volume of prior TVH was not significantly correlated to average GRS score, ρ = 0.49 (p = .10). The model improved comfort and confidence scores in the junior group more than senior group (p = .04), but senior group still had higher post simulation confidence scores than the junior group (p = .02). CONCLUSION: Face and construct validity with the modified Flowerpot Model was demonstrated. This low fidelity model is capable of simulation of a TVH with a novel vesicovaginal dissection. Prior surgical experience was not correlated to GRS score or time to procedure completion.
Authors: Danielle D Antosh; Robert E Gutman; Cheryl B Iglesia; Andrew I Sokol; Amy J Park Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: D R Malacarne; C M Escobar; C J Lam; K L Ferrante; D Szyld; Veronica T Lerner Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2019 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: Daniel M Morgan; Neil S Kamdar; Carolyn W Swenson; Emily K Kobernik; Anne G Sammarco; Brahmajee Nallamothu Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-12-26 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Maria P Ruiz; Ling Chen; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Caryn M St Clair; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 7.661