Literature DB >> 30191250

Validation of an educational simulation model for vaginal hysterectomy training: a pilot study.

Douglas Miyazaki1, Catherine A Matthews2, Mujan Varasteh Kia3, Amr Sherif El Haraki2, Noah Miyazaki4, Chi Chiung Grace Chen3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The Miya Model ™ (Miyazaki Enterprises, Winston-Salem, NC, USA) was designed as a realistic vaginal surgery simulation model. Our aim was to describe this model and present pilot data on validity and reliability of the model as an assessment tool of vaginal hysterectomy skills.
METHODS: We video recorded ten obstetrics and gynecology residents (novice group) and ten practicing gynecologists (expert group) performing vaginal hysterectomy using the Miya model. Blood loss and time taken to complete the procedure were documented. Participants evaluated the model using a postsimulation survey. In addition, two experienced gynecologic surgeons independently evaluated video recordings of each participant's performance using two previously validated global rating scales: Reznick's Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) and Vaginal Surgical Skills Index (VSSI).
RESULTS: Most participants (80% of novice and 100% of expert group) rated the model as effective or highly effective for vaginal hysterectomy training and assessment. Median time to procedure completion was significantly higher in the novice group, whereas median estimated blood loss was no different between groups. No significant differences were observed in the composite median OSATS or VSSI scores between groups. The interrater reliability indices for subscales and composite scores of the OSATS and VSSI were high and ranged from 0.79 to 0.90 and 0.77 to 0.93, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: With further study, the Miya Model may be a useful tool for teaching and assessing vaginal surgical skills.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Simulation; Surgical skills; Training; Vaginal hysterectomy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30191250      PMCID: PMC6401358          DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3761-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  12 in total

1.  The next GME accreditation system--rationale and benefits.

Authors:  Thomas J Nasca; Ingrid Philibert; Timothy Brigham; Timothy C Flynn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Assessing current trends in resident hysterectomy training.

Authors:  Danielle Burkett; Joanna Horwitz; Vanessa Kennedy; Darby Murphy; Scott Graziano; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.091

3.  Objective assessment of vaginal surgical skills.

Authors:  Chi Chiung Grace Chen; Abner Korn; Christopher Klingele; Matthew D Barber; Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Mark D Walters; J Eric Jelovsek
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Technical-skills training in the 21st century.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Ara Darzi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Development and validation of simulation training for vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Joy A Greer; Saya Segal; Catherine R Salva; Lily A Arya
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination.

Authors:  R Reznick; G Regehr; H MacRae; J Martin; W McCulloch
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  A novel and inexpensive vaginal hysterectomy simulator.

Authors:  Breton F Barrier; Amy B Thompson; Michael W McCullough; John A Occhino
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.929

8.  The obstetrics and gynecology milestone project.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-03

9.  A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of Vaginal, Abdominal, and Laparoscopic Hysterectomies.

Authors:  Anand Murari Nanavati; Sudhir B Gokral
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 10.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Teaching learners to raise the roof: a vaginal surgery simulator for apical suspension.

Authors:  Cassandra K Kisby; Mary V Baker; Isabel C Green; John A Occhino
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  A review of simulation training and new 3D computer-generated synthetic organs for robotic surgery education.

Authors:  Daniel M Costello; Isabel Huntington; Grace Burke; Brooke Farrugia; Andrea J O'Connor; Anthony J Costello; Benjamin C Thomas; Philip Dundee; Ahmed Ghazi; Niall Corcoran
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-09-03

3.  Mapping the robotic hysterectomy learning curve and re-establishing surgical training metrics.

Authors:  Taylor B Turner; Kenneth H Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Validation of Transvaginal Hysterectomy Surgical Model - Modification of the Flowerpot Model to Improve Vesicovaginal Plane Simulation.

Authors:  Linda S Burkett; Jennifer Makin; Mary Ackenbom; Amanda Artsen; Megan Bradley
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.314

5.  Establishing Validity for a Vaginal Hysterectomy Simulation Model for Surgical Skills Assessment.

Authors:  Chi Chung Grace Chen; Ernest G Lockrow; Christopher C DeStephano; Mikio A Nihira; Catherine Matthews; Leslie Kammire; Lisa M Landrum; Bruce D Anderson; Douglas Miyazaki
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 7.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.