Literature DB >> 27637233

Progressive reduction in abdominal hysterectomy rates: impact of laparoscopy, robotics and surgeon factors.

Michael Moen1, Michael Noone2, Aarathi Cholkeri-Singh2, Brett Vassallo2, Brian Locker2, Charles Miller2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to describe changes in rates of types of hysterectomy at a tertiary care community teaching hospital since the introduction of laparoscopic and robotic techniques and to determine the effect of surgeon characteristics on route of hysterectomy. This is a retrospective analysis of types of hysterectomies performed for benign disease during five different years (1989, 1994, 1999, 2004, 2009) at a large community teaching hospital. Hospital discharge data was reviewed to identify all hysterectomies performed during the first six months of each year of the study. Hospital charts were reviewed and patient characteristics, indication for surgery, type of hysterectomy and surgeon characteristics were recorded. Hysterectomies performed for malignancy, suspected malignancy, or postpartum hemorrhage were excluded. Types of hysterectomies included abdominal (AH), vaginal (VH), laparoscopic-assisted vaginal (LAVH), total laparoscopic (TLH), laparoscopic supracervical (LSH) and robotic-assisted (RH). The progressive introduction of newer minimally invasive surgical techniques (LAVH, TLH, LSH, and RH) resulted in an overall reduction in the abdominal hysterectomy rate from 77 to 35.2 % during the time of the study. The majority of abdominal, laparoscopic supracervical and robotic hysterectomies were performed by generalists, while the majority of vaginal, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal and total laparoscopic hysterectomies were performed by fellowship trained subspecialists. Minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques significantly reduced the rate of abdominal hysterectomies. The LSH and RH were the techniques utilized by generalists as their most preferred minimally invasive surgical approaches to hysterectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hysterectomy; Laparoscopic hysterectomy; Minimally-invasive surgery; Robotic hysterectomy; Vaginal hysterectomy

Year:  2013        PMID: 27637233     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-013-0412-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  25 in total

1.  Perceived proficiency in endoscopic techniques among senior obstetrics and gynecology residents.

Authors:  J I Einarsson; A Young; L Tsien; H Sangi-Haghpeykar
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  2002-05

2.  Assessing current trends in resident hysterectomy training.

Authors:  Danielle Burkett; Joanna Horwitz; Vanessa Kennedy; Darby Murphy; Scott Graziano; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.091

3.  Effect of surgical volume on route of hysterectomy and short-term morbidity.

Authors:  Leslie R Boyd; Akiva P Novetsky; John P Curtin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Implementation of advanced laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: national overview of trends.

Authors:  A R H Twijnstra; W Kolkman; G C M Trimbos-Kemper; F W Jansen
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.137

5.  AAGL position statement: route of hysterectomy to treat benign uterine disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  FINHYST 2006--national prospective 1-year survey of 5,279 hysterectomies.

Authors:  Tea H I Brummer; Jyrki Jalkanen; Jaana Fraser; Anna-Mari Heikkinen; Minna Kauko; Juha Mäkinen; Ulla Puistola; Jari Sjöberg; Eija Tomás; Päivi Härkki
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 7.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Anne Lethaby; Emma Tavender; Elizabeth Curr; Ray Garry; Sabine van Voorst; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

8.  Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988-1990.

Authors:  L S Wilcox; L M Koonin; R Pokras; L T Strauss; Z Xia; H B Peterson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches.

Authors:  Vanessa L Jacoby; Amy Autry; Gavin Jacobson; Robert Domush; Sanae Nakagawa; Alison Jacoby
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Perceived proficiency in minimally invasive surgery among senior OB/GYN residents.

Authors:  Jon I Einarsson; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  2 in total

1.  Why do we argue about route of hysterectomy? A call for dialogue.

Authors:  Andrew J Walter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Ureteral injury during abdominal and pelvic surgery: immediate versus deferred repair.

Authors:  Alfredo Aguilera; Juan Gomez Rivas; Luis M Quintana Franco; Jose Quesada-Olarte; Diego M Carrion; Luis Martínez-Piñeiro
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2019-08-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.