BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Disruption of the BBB in MS is associated with the development of new lesions and clinical relapses and signifies the presence of active inflammation. It is most commonly detected as enhancement on MR imaging performed with contrast agents that are costly and occasionally toxic. We investigated whether the BBB status in white matter lesions may be indirectly ascertained via examination of features on T1- and T2-weighted images obtained before the injection of a contrast agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We considered 93 brain MR imaging studies on 16 patients that included T1-, T2-, and T2-weighted FLAIR images and predicted voxel wise enhancement after intravenous injection of a gadolinium chelate. We then used these voxel-level predictions to determine the presence or absence of abnormal enhancement anywhere in the brain. RESULTS: On a voxel-by-voxel basis, enhancement can be predicted by using contrast-free measures with an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80-0.87). At the whole-brain level, enhancement can be predicted with an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.62-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: In many cases, breakdown of the BBB in acute MS lesions may be inferred without the need to inject an MR imaging contrast agent. The inference relies on intrinsic properties of tissue damage in acute lesions. Although contrast studies are more accurate, they may sometimes be unnecessary.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Disruption of the BBB in MS is associated with the development of new lesions and clinical relapses and signifies the presence of active inflammation. It is most commonly detected as enhancement on MR imaging performed with contrast agents that are costly and occasionally toxic. We investigated whether the BBB status in white matter lesions may be indirectly ascertained via examination of features on T1- and T2-weighted images obtained before the injection of a contrast agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We considered 93 brain MR imaging studies on 16 patients that included T1-, T2-, and T2-weighted FLAIR images and predicted voxel wise enhancement after intravenous injection of a gadolinium chelate. We then used these voxel-level predictions to determine the presence or absence of abnormal enhancement anywhere in the brain. RESULTS: On a voxel-by-voxel basis, enhancement can be predicted by using contrast-free measures with an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80-0.87). At the whole-brain level, enhancement can be predicted with an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.62-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: In many cases, breakdown of the BBB in acute MS lesions may be inferred without the need to inject an MR imaging contrast agent. The inference relies on intrinsic properties of tissue damage in acute lesions. Although contrast studies are more accurate, they may sometimes be unnecessary.
Authors: Jonathan R Dillman; James H Ellis; Richard H Cohan; Peter J Strouse; Sophia C Jan Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: J A Moreno-Romero; S Segura; J M Mascaró; S E Cowper; M Julià; E Poch; A Botey; C Herrero Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2007-07-11 Impact factor: 9.302
Authors: Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Brenda Banwell; Michel Clanet; Jeffrey A Cohen; Massimo Filippi; Kazuo Fujihara; Eva Havrdova; Michael Hutchinson; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Xavier Montalban; Paul O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Emmanuelle Waubant; Brian Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: I Blystad; I Håkansson; A Tisell; J Ernerudh; Ö Smedby; P Lundberg; E-M Larsson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Gina-Maria Pomann; Elizabeth M Sweeney; Daniel S Reich; Ana-Maria Staicu; Russell T Shinohara Journal: Stat Med Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Ponnada A Narayana; Ivan Coronado; Sheeba J Sujit; Jerry S Wolinsky; Fred D Lublin; Refaat E Gabr Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-12-17 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Yi Wang; Pascal Spincemaille; Zhe Liu; Alexey Dimov; Kofi Deh; Jianqi Li; Yan Zhang; Yihao Yao; Kelly M Gillen; Alan H Wilman; Ajay Gupta; Apostolos John Tsiouris; Ilhami Kovanlikaya; Gloria Chia-Yi Chiang; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Lawrence Tanenbaum; Weiwei Chen; Wenzhen Zhu; Shixin Chang; Min Lou; Brian H Kopell; Michael G Kaplitt; David Devos; Toshinori Hirai; Xuemei Huang; Yukunori Korogi; Alexander Shtilbans; Geon-Ho Jahng; Daniel Pelletier; Susan A Gauthier; David Pitt; Ashley I Bush; Gary M Brittenham; Martin R Prince Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Y Zhang; S A Gauthier; A Gupta; L Tu; J Comunale; G C-Y Chiang; W Chen; C A Salustri; W Zhu; Y Wang Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Y Zhang; S A Gauthier; A Gupta; W Chen; J Comunale; G C-Y Chiang; D Zhou; G Askin; W Zhu; D Pitt; Y Wang Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Elizabeth M Sweeney; Russell T Shinohara; Navid Shiee; Farrah J Mateen; Avni A Chudgar; Jennifer L Cuzzocreo; Peter A Calabresi; Dzung L Pham; Daniel S Reich; Ciprian M Crainiceanu Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 4.881