Literature DB >> 31845845

Deep Learning for Predicting Enhancing Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis from Noncontrast MRI.

Ponnada A Narayana1, Ivan Coronado1, Sheeba J Sujit1, Jerry S Wolinsky1, Fred D Lublin1, Refaat E Gabr1.   

Abstract

Background Enhancing lesions on MRI scans obtained after contrast material administration are commonly thought to represent disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS); it is desirable to develop methods that can predict enhancing lesions without the use of contrast material. Purpose To evaluate whether deep learning can predict enhancing lesions on MRI scans obtained without the use of contrast material. Materials and Methods This study involved prospective analysis of existing MRI data. A convolutional neural network was used for classification of enhancing lesions on unenhanced MRI scans. This classification was performed for each slice, and the slice scores were combined by using a fully connected network to produce participant-wise predictions. The network input consisted of 1970 multiparametric MRI scans from 1008 patients recruited from 2005 to 2009. Enhanced lesions on postcontrast T1-weighted images served as the ground truth. The network performance was assessed by using fivefold cross-validation. Statistical analysis of the network performance included calculation of lesion detection rates and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs). Results MRI scans from 1008 participants (mean age, 37.7 years ± 9.7; 730 women) were analyzed. At least one enhancing lesion was observed in 519 participants. The sensitivity and specificity averaged across the five test sets were 78% ± 4.3 and 73% ± 2.7, respectively, for slice-wise prediction. The corresponding participant-wise values were 72% ± 9.0 and 70% ± 6.3. The diagnostic performances (AUCs) were 0.82 ± 0.02 and 0.75 ± 0.03 for slice-wise and participant-wise enhancement prediction, respectively. Conclusion Deep learning used with conventional MRI identified enhanced lesions in multiple sclerosis from images from unenhanced multiparametric MRI with moderate to high accuracy. © RSNA, 2019.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31845845      PMCID: PMC6980901          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019191061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  32 in total

1.  Unified approach for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation on brain MRI.

Authors:  Balasrinivasa Rao Sajja; Sushmita Datta; Renjie He; Meghana Mehta; Rakesh K Gupta; Jerry S Wolinsky; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 2.  Natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients with multiple sclerosis: lessons from 28 cases.

Authors:  David B Clifford; Andrea De Luca; Andrea DeLuca; David M Simpson; Gabriele Arendt; Gavin Giovannoni; Avindra Nath
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 44.182

3.  Non-contrast MR imaging of blood-brain barrier permeability to water.

Authors:  Zixuan Lin; Yang Li; Pan Su; Deng Mao; Zhiliang Wei; Jay J Pillai; Abhay Moghekar; Matthias van Osch; Yulin Ge; Hanzhang Lu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Deep learning enables reduced gadolinium dose for contrast-enhanced brain MRI.

Authors:  Enhao Gong; John M Pauly; Max Wintermark; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Segmentation of white matter hyperintensities using convolutional neural networks with global spatial information in routine clinical brain MRI with none or mild vascular pathology.

Authors:  Muhammad Febrian Rachmadi; Maria Del C Valdés-Hernández; Maria Leonora Fatimah Agan; Carol Di Perri; Taku Komura
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 6.  Gadolinium deposition in the brain: summary of evidence and recommendations.

Authors:  Vikas Gulani; Fernando Calamante; Frank G Shellock; Emanuel Kanal; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 7.  Deep Learning for Health Informatics.

Authors:  Daniele Ravi; Charence Wong; Fani Deligianni; Melissa Berthelot; Javier Andreu-Perez; Benny Lo; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 5.772

8.  Overview of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and disease progression associated with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Mark J Tullman
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Regional cortical thickness in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: A multi-center study.

Authors:  Ponnada A Narayana; Koushik A Govindarajan; Priya Goel; Sushmita Datta; John A Lincoln; Stacy S Cofield; Gary R Cutter; Fred D Lublin; Jerry S Wolinsky
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Evaluation of a deep learning approach for the segmentation of brain tissues and white matter hyperintensities of presumed vascular origin in MRI.

Authors:  Pim Moeskops; Jeroen de Bresser; Hugo J Kuijf; Adriënne M Mendrik; Geert Jan Biessels; Josien P W Pluim; Ivana Išgum
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.881

View more
  8 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Y W Lui; P D Chang; G Zaharchuk; D P Barboriak; A E Flanders; M Wintermark; C P Hess; C G Filippi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Deep learning segmentation of gadolinium-enhancing lesions in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Ivan Coronado; Refaat E Gabr; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  Foundations of Lesion Detection Using Machine Learning in Clinical Neuroimaging.

Authors:  Manoj Mannil; Nicolin Hainc; Risto Grkovski; Sebastian Winklhofer
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2022

4.  Feasibility of Simulated Postcontrast MRI of Glioblastomas and Lower-Grade Gliomas by Using Three-dimensional Fully Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Evan Calabrese; Jeffrey D Rudie; Andreas M Rauschecker; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Soonmee Cha
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-05-19

Review 5.  Neuroimaging in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Current Applications.

Authors:  Robert Monsour; Mudit Dutta; Ahmed-Zayn Mohamed; Andrew Borkowski; Narayan A Viswanadhan
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2022-04-12

6.  Multiple sclerosis in 2020: un bon cru.

Authors:  Elisabeth Maillart; Catherine Lubetzki
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 44.182

7.  Deep learning based sarcopenia prediction from shear-wave ultrasonographic elastography and gray scale ultrasonography of rectus femoris muscle.

Authors:  Jisook Yi; YiRang Shin; Seok Hahn; Young Han Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Opportunities for Understanding MS Mechanisms and Progression With MRI Using Large-Scale Data Sharing and Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Hugo Vrenken; Mark Jenkinson; Dzung L Pham; Charles R G Guttmann; Deborah Pareto; Michel Paardekooper; Alexandra de Sitter; Maria A Rocca; Viktor Wottschel; M Jorge Cardoso; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 9.910

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.