Literature DB >> 31156722

A Spatio-Temporal Model for Longitudinal Image-on-Image Regression.

Arnab Hazra1, Brian J Reich1, Daniel S Reich2, Russell T Shinohara3, Ana-Maria Staicu1.   

Abstract

Neurologists and radiologists often use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the management of subjects with multiple sclerosis (MS) because it is sensitive to inflammatory and demyelinative changes in the white matter of the brain and spinal cord. Two conventional modalities used for identifying lesions are T1-weighted (T1) and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging, which are used clinically and in research studies. Magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), which is available only in research settings, is an advanced MRI modality that has been used extensively for measuring disease-related demyelination both in white matter lesions as well across normal-appearing white matter. Acquiring MTR is not standard in clinical practice, due to the increased scan time and cost. Hence, prediction of MTR based on the modalities T1 and FLAIR could have great impact on the availability of these promising measures for improved patient management. We propose a spatio-temporal regression model for image response and image predictors that are acquired longitudinally, with images being co-registered within the subject but not across subjects. The model is additive, with the response at a voxel being dependent on the available covariates not only through the current voxel but also on the imaging information from the voxels within a neighboring spatial region as well as their temporal gradients. We propose a dynamic Bayesian estimation procedure that updates the parameters of the subject-specific regression model as data accummulates. To bypass the computational challenges associated with a Bayesian approach for high-dimensional imaging data, we propose an approximate Bayesian inference technique. We assess the model fitting and the prediction performance using longitudinally acquired MRI images from 46 MS patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  T1-weighted; T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; composite likelihood; dynamic Bayesian updating; longitudinal imaging study; magnetization transfer ratio; multiple sclerosis; spatio-temporal regression model

Year:  2017        PMID: 31156722      PMCID: PMC6537615     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Biosci        ISSN: 1867-1764


  34 in total

1.  A new variational shape-from-orientation approach to correcting intensity inhomogeneities in magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  S H Lai; M Fang
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 2.  Voxel-based morphometry--the methods.

Authors:  J Ashburner; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Multiple sclerosis: magnetization transfer histogram analysis of segmented normal-appearing white matter.

Authors:  I Catalaa; R I Grossman; D L Kolson; J K Udupa; L G Nyul; L Wei; X Zhang; M Polansky; L J Mannon; J C McGowan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  A review of structural magnetic resonance neuroimaging.

Authors:  M Symms; H R Jäger; K Schmierer; T A Yousry
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  A longitudinal study of abnormalities on MRI and disability from multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Peter A Brex; Olga Ciccarelli; Jonathon I O'Riordan; Michael Sailer; Alan J Thompson; David H Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Predictive value of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for relapse rate and changes in disability or impairment in multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis. Gadolinium MRI Meta-analysis Group.

Authors:  L Kappos; D Moeri; E W Radue; A Schoetzau; K Schweikert; F Barkhof; D Miller; C R Guttmann; H L Weiner; C Gasperini; M Filippi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-03-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  MTR and T1 provide complementary information in MS NAWM, but not in lesions.

Authors:  C M Griffin; G J Parker; G J Barker; A J Thompson; D H Miller
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 8.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the "McDonald Criteria".

Authors:  Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Gilles Edan; Massimo Filippi; Hans-Peter Hartung; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Luanne M Metz; Henry F McFarland; Paul W O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Brian G Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Magnetization transfer ratio and myelin in postmortem multiple sclerosis brain.

Authors:  Klaus Schmierer; Francesco Scaravilli; Daniel R Altmann; Gareth J Barker; David H Miller
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative magnetization transfer imaging in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth N York; Michael J Thrippleton; Rozanna Meijboom; David P J Hunt; Adam D Waldman
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-04-04

2.  A spatial Bayesian latent factor model for image-on-image regression.

Authors:  Cui Guo; Jian Kang; Timothy D Johnson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.571

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.