Literature DB >> 19770337

Frequency and severity of adverse effects of iodinated and gadolinium contrast materials: retrospective review of 456,930 doses.

Christopher H Hunt1, Robert P Hartman, Gina K Hesley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and characteristics of adverse effects of low-osmolar iodinated and gadolinium contrast agents in a single-center experience with a large number of cases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all intravascular doses of low-osmolar iodinated and gadolinium contrast materials administered from 2002 through 2006 was conducted. Adverse effects were identified through the use of radiologist and nurse event recording. Adverse effects were examined for type and severity of reaction, treatment required, and outcome.
RESULTS: A total of 456,930 contrast doses (298,491 low-osmolar iodinated, 158,439 gadolinium) were administered over the study period. A total of 522 cases of adverse effects (0.11% of total) were identified (458 low-osmolar iodinated, 64 gadolinium). The most common adverse effects were hives (274, 52.5%) and nausea (92, 17.6%). Of all adverse effects, 79 of low-osmolar iodinated and 15 of gadolinium contrast material necessitated treatment. Most treatments were performed in the radiology department alone. Only 16 cases of adverse effects necessitated transfer for further observation or treatment. Epinephrine was used to manage an adverse effect in nine instances. Thirty-two of the adverse effects of low-osmolar iodinated contrast material (6.9%) occurred in patients with a history of allergy who received premedication. Only two of these premedication reactions necessitated transfer to the emergency department. The one death in the study period occurred after administration of low-osmolar iodinated contrast material. The patient had no symptoms during the contrast administration or imaging but died suddenly within 30 minutes of receiving the dose.
CONCLUSION: Both iodinated and gadolinium contrast agents are associated with a very low rate of adverse effects. Most adverse effects are mild and can be managed in the radiology department. Transfer for additional treatment or observation is rarely needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19770337     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  51 in total

1.  Safety incident reporting in emergency radiology: analysis of 1717 safety incident reports.

Authors:  Mohammad Mansouri; Khalid W Shaqdan; Shima Aran; Ali S Raja; Michael H Lev; Hani H Abujudeh
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-08-06

2.  Evaluation of adverse reactions to contrast media in the hospital.

Authors:  E-J Kyung; J-H Ryu; E-Y Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Synthesis and Preclinical Characterization of a Cationic Iodinated Imaging Contrast Agent (CA4+) and Its Use for Quantitative Computed Tomography of Ex Vivo Human Hip Cartilage.

Authors:  Rachel C Stewart; Amit N Patwa; Hrvoje Lusic; Jonathan D Freedman; Michel Wathier; Brian D Snyder; Ali Guermazi; Mark W Grinstaff
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 4.  Gadolinium contrast agents for CNS imaging: current concepts and clinical evidence.

Authors:  E Kanal; K Maravilla; H A Rowley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Allergic reactions to iodinated contrast media: premedication considerations for patients at risk.

Authors:  Jennifer G Schopp; Ramesh S Iyer; Carolyn L Wang; Jonelle M Petscavage; Angelisa M Paladin; William H Bush; Manjiri K Dighe
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-02-21

6.  Interest of HYPR flow dynamic MRA for characterization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: comparison with TRICKS MRA and catheter DSA.

Authors:  Raphaël Dautry; Myriam Edjlali; Pauline Roca; Cécile Rabrait; Yijing Wu; Kevin Johnson; Olivier Wieben; Denis Trystram; Christine Rodriguez-Régent; Fawaz Alshareef; Patrick Turski; Jean-François Meder; Olivier Naggara; Catherine Oppenheim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Should we be moving to a national standardized non-gadolinium MR imaging protocol for the surveillance of vestibular schwannomas?

Authors:  Stuart Currie; David Saunders; Jeremy Macmullen-Price; Sanjay Verma; Philip Ayres; Caroline Tait; Ceryl Harwood; Andrew Scarsbrook; Ian J Craven
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Predicting breakdown of the blood-brain barrier in multiple sclerosis without contrast agents.

Authors:  R T Shinohara; J Goldsmith; F J Mateen; C Crainiceanu; D S Reich
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Double-inversion recovery with synthetic magnetic resonance: a pilot study for assessing synovitis of the knee joint compared to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jisook Yi; Young Han Lee; Ho-Taek Song; Jin-Suck Suh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: venous thromboembolism in the context of pregnancy.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Anita Rajasekhar; Saskia Middeldorp; Claire McLintock; Marc A Rodger; Andra H James; Sara R Vazquez; Ian A Greer; John J Riva; Meha Bhatt; Nicole Schwab; Danielle Barrett; Andrea LaHaye; Bram Rochwerg
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.