PURPOSE: Women with breast cancer, who are found to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, have a high risk of ovarian cancer and metachronous breast cancer. Treatment-focused genetic testing (TFGT), offered around the time of diagnosis, allows genetic test results to inform surgical treatment decisions. However, concern has been raised that offering TFGT at this time may overly increase psychological burden. This study aimed to qualitatively explore women's attitudes and experiences of TFGT. METHODS: Women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer at age 50 years or less undertook a semi-structured telephone interview (n = 26). The sample included women who had been offered TFGT, based on family history and/or other risk criteria (n = 14), and women who had been diagnosed within the past 6-12 months and had not been offered TFGT (n = 12). Interviews explored women's attitudes towards TFGT, perceived benefits and disadvantages, implications of TFGT and impact on surgical decision making. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. RESULTS: Women expressed positive attitudes towards TFGT and felt it was highly relevant to their surgical decision making. They did not feel that an offer of TFGT shortly after, or at the time of diagnosis, added undue psychological burden. The majority of women interviewed felt that TFGT should be incorporated into standard clinical care. CONCLUSIONS: TFGT is viewed favourably by women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to examine the long-term impact of TFGT. We conclude that an offer of TFGT is not perceived as 'too much, too soon' by relevant patients.
PURPOSE:Women with breast cancer, who are found to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, have a high risk of ovarian cancer and metachronous breast cancer. Treatment-focused genetic testing (TFGT), offered around the time of diagnosis, allows genetic test results to inform surgical treatment decisions. However, concern has been raised that offering TFGT at this time may overly increase psychological burden. This study aimed to qualitatively explore women's attitudes and experiences of TFGT. METHODS:Women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer at age 50 years or less undertook a semi-structured telephone interview (n = 26). The sample included women who had been offered TFGT, based on family history and/or other risk criteria (n = 14), and women who had been diagnosed within the past 6-12 months and had not been offered TFGT (n = 12). Interviews explored women's attitudes towards TFGT, perceived benefits and disadvantages, implications of TFGT and impact on surgical decision making. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. RESULTS:Women expressed positive attitudes towards TFGT and felt it was highly relevant to their surgical decision making. They did not feel that an offer of TFGT shortly after, or at the time of diagnosis, added undue psychological burden. The majority of women interviewed felt that TFGT should be incorporated into standard clinical care. CONCLUSIONS: TFGT is viewed favourably by women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to examine the long-term impact of TFGT. We conclude that an offer of TFGT is not perceived as 'too much, too soon' by relevant patients.
Authors: Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jeanne van Echtelt; Jan van den Bout; Margreet G E M Ausems; Herman F J ten Kroode Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2006-09-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Marc D Schwartz; Caryn Lerman; Barbara Brogan; Beth N Peshkin; Claudine Isaacs; Tiffani DeMarco; Chanita Hughes Halbert; Marie Pennanen; Clinton Finch Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Noah D Kauff; Jaya M Satagopan; Mark E Robson; Lauren Scheuer; Martee Hensley; Clifford A Hudis; Nathan A Ellis; Jeff Boyd; Patrick I Borgen; Richard R Barakat; Larry Norton; Mercedes Castiel; Khedoudja Nafa; Kenneth Offit Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-05-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J I Martínez-Ferrandis; A Vega; I Chirivella; P Marín-García; A Insa; A Lluch; A Carracedo; F J Chaves; J García-Conde; A Cervantes; M-E Armengod Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker; Margreet G E M Ausems; Maria Schipper; Herman F J Ten Kroode; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jan van den Bout Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2007-08-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker; Herman F J ten Kroode; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jan van den Bout; Margreet G E M Ausems Journal: Genet Med Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Bettina Meiser; Kathy Tucker; Michael Friedlander; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Elizabeth Lobb; Christobel Saunders; Gillian Mitchell Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2008-11-28 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Shoshana M Rosenberg; Kathryn J Ruddy; Rulla M Tamimi; Shari Gelber; Lidia Schapira; Steven Come; Virginia F Borges; Bryce Larsen; Judy E Garber; Ann H Partridge Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Johanna Ringwald; Christina Wochnowski; Kristin Bosse; Katrin Elisabeth Giel; Norbert Schäffeler; Stephan Zipfel; Martin Teufel Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Nicky Dekker; Eleonora B L van Dorst; Rob B van der Luijt; Marielle E van Gijn; Marc van Tuil; Johan A Offerhaus; Margreet G E M Ausems Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Marijke R Wevers; Margreet G E M Ausems; Senno Verhoef; Eveline M A Bleiker; Daniela E E Hahn; Titia Brouwer; Frans B L Hogervorst; Rob B van der Luijt; Thijs van Dalen; Evert B Theunissen; Bart van Ooijen; Marnix A de Roos; Paul J Borgstein; Bart C Vrouenraets; Eline Vriens; Wim H Bouma; Herman Rijna; Johannes P Vente; Jacobien M Kieffer; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Arjen J Witkamp; Neil K Aaronson Journal: Genet Med Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Sarah Wright; Mary Porteous; Diane Stirling; Julia Lawton; Oliver Young; Charlie Gourley; Nina Hallowell Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 2.537