Literature DB >> 15824179

Utilization of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Marc D Schwartz1, Caryn Lerman, Barbara Brogan, Beth N Peshkin, Claudine Isaacs, Tiffani DeMarco, Chanita Hughes Halbert, Marie Pennanen, Clinton Finch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who are at risk for carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, knowledge of mutation status can influence local breast cancer treatment decisions. Thus, genetic testing at the time of diagnosis is increasingly considered an option for such patients. In this study, we evaluated factors associated with the decision to undergo BRCA1/BRCA2 gene testing at the time of initial breast cancer diagnosis.
METHODS: Participants were newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who had not yet received definitive local breast cancer treatment and who had a family history consistent with hereditary breast cancer. Participants were offered genetic counseling and BRCA1/BRCA2 testing with results in 2 to 3 weeks.
RESULTS: Of 231 patients who referred to the study, 20 (9%) declined the baseline interview, 34 (15%) completed a baseline interview but declined genetic testing, and 177 (76%) underwent BRCA1/BRCA2 testing. Physician recommendation for BRCA1/BRCA2 testing and indecision about definitive local treatment were both associated with undergoing testing. Among patients who were tested, 38 (21%) proceeded with definitive local treatment before receiving test results. Delay in the availability of test results and low levels of anxiety were associated with the decision to proceed with definitive local treatment before receiving test results.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that if rapid testing is available and genetic referrals are made for appropriate patients, a high proportion are likely to opt for such testing. In particular, patients who have not yet reached a decision about definitive local treatment may benefit from a genetic referral.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15824179     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-03-0545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  37 in total

1.  Perception of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic tests among members of a large managed care organization.

Authors:  Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Nicole Wagner; Anh Quynh Le; Eve Halterman; Nadine Cornish; James W Dearing
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Adherence patterns to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for referral to cancer genetic professionals.

Authors:  Terri Febbraro; Katina Robison; Jennifer Scalia Wilbur; Jessica Laprise; Amy Bregar; Vrishali Lopes; Robert Legare; Ashley Stuckey
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Affective associations and cognitive beliefs relate to individuals' decisions to perform testicular or breast self-exams.

Authors:  Carolyn R Brown-Kramer; Marc T Kiviniemi
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-04-08

Review 4.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in BRCA Counseling and Testing: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Christina D Williams; Alyssa Jasmine Bullard; Meghan O'Leary; Reana Thomas; Thomas S Redding; Karen Goldstein
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2019-04-08

5.  Are we being overly cautious? A qualitative inquiry into the experiences and perceptions of treatment-focused germline BRCA genetic testing amongst women recently diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  E Zilliacus; B Meiser; M Gleeson; K Watts; K Tucker; E A Lobb; G Mitchell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  The Role of Knowledge on Genetic Counseling and Testing in Black Cancer Survivors at Increased Risk of Carrying a BRCA1/2 Mutation.

Authors:  Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza; Monica C Jackson; Lyndsay Anderson; Vanessa B Sheppard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Satisfaction with physician recommendation for and information about genetic counseling among breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Susan T Vadaparampil; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Ji-Hyun Lee; Teri Malo; Xiuhua Zhao; Cheryl Miree; Jennifer Brzosowicz
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  BRCA1/2 mutation testing in breast cancer patients: a prospective study of the long-term psychological impact of approach during adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker; Margreet G E M Ausems; Maria Schipper; Herman F J Ten Kroode; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jan van den Bout
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Genetic risk assessment for women with epithelial ovarian cancer: referral patterns and outcomes in a university gynecologic oncology clinic.

Authors:  Sue V Petzel; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Tracy Bensend; Anna Leininger; Peter A Argenta; Melissa A Geller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 10.  Genetic counselling and testing for inherited gene mutations in newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer: a review of the existing literature and a proposed research agenda.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Kathy Tucker; Michael Friedlander; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Elizabeth Lobb; Christobel Saunders; Gillian Mitchell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.