Literature DB >> 23192360

Acceptance of genetic counseling and testing in a hospital-based series of patients with gynecological cancer.

Nicky Dekker1, Eleonora B L van Dorst, Rob B van der Luijt, Marielle E van Gijn, Marc van Tuil, Johan A Offerhaus, Margreet G E M Ausems.   

Abstract

Referral of patients with endometrial (EC) and/or ovarian cancer (OC) for genetic counseling is based on age at diagnosis and family history. Many patients with hereditary cancers are missed by following this strategy. We determined acceptance and mutation detection rate of offering genetic counseling and testing to unselected EC and OC patients. Therefore, in 2007, EC and OC patients were invited for genetic counseling and testing. Patients were asked for their reasons to accept or decline. Nineteen out of fifty-two EC patients (36 %) and twenty-two out of thirty-five OC patients (63 %) accepted genetic counseling, mainly to receive risk assessment for themselves and relatives. Counseling was declined mainly because patients did not want more tests or had no relatives for whom it was relevant. Eighteen out of nineteen EC patients (95 %) and twenty out of twenty-two OC patients (91 %) underwent genetic testing. One EC patient carried an MSH6 mutation (mutation detection rate: 6 %). BRCA1/2 mutations were found in two out of twenty OC patients (10 %). Eleven patients (29 %) received surveillance recommendations for themselves and their relatives. Finally, family history recorded by the gynecologist was compared to that taken by the clinical geneticist. Gynecologists reported family history in ten out of forty-one participants (24 %). In conclusion, genetic counseling and testing are acceptable to patients with OC and/or EC. The 10 % BRCA1/2 mutation detection rate and underreporting of family history by gynecologists warrant referral for genetic counseling for all OC patients, followed by BRCA1/2 testing if indicated. We recommend that microsatellite instability and immunohistochemical analysis be performed in all EC patients, followed by genetic counseling if appropriate. These strategies will lead to better cancer prevention in gynecological cancer patients and their relatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23192360     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9553-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  68 in total

1.  Factors associated with decisions about clinical BRCA1/2 testing.

Authors:  K Armstrong; K Calzone; J Stopfer; G Fitzgerald; J Coyne; B Weber
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Prospective evaluation of molecular screening for Lynch syndrome in patients with endometrial cancer ≤ 70 years.

Authors:  Celine H M Leenen; Margot G F van Lier; Helena C van Doorn; Monique E van Leerdam; Sjarlot G Kooi; Judith de Waard; Robert F Hoedemaeker; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Sanne M Hulspas; Hendrikus J Dubbink; Ernst J Kuipers; Anja Wagner; Winand N M Dinjens; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Lower incidence of colorectal cancer and later age of disease onset in 27 families with pathogenic MSH6 germline mutations compared with families with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations: the German Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Consortium.

Authors:  Jens Plaschke; Christoph Engel; Stefan Krüger; Elke Holinski-Feder; Constanze Pagenstecher; Elisabeth Mangold; Gabriela Moeslein; Karsten Schulmann; Johannes Gebert; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz; Josef Rüschoff; Markus Loeffler; Hans K Schackert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Lynch syndrome screening strategies among newly diagnosed endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Kimberly Resnick; J Michael Straughn; Floor Backes; Heather Hampel; Kellie S Matthews; David E Cohn
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Barriers to participating in genetic counseling and BRCA testing during primary treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker; Herman F J ten Kroode; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jan van den Bout; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 6.  Association of HNPCC and endometrial cancers.

Authors:  Kouji Banno; Nobuyuki Susumu; Megumi Yanokura; Takeshi Hirao; Takashi Iwata; Akira Hirasawa; Daisuke Aoki; Kokichi Sugano; Shiro Nozawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  One in 10 ovarian cancer patients carry germ line BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: results of a prospective study in Southern Sweden.

Authors:  S Malander; M Ridderheim; A Måsbäck; N Loman; U Kristoffersson; H Olsson; M Nilbert; A Borg
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  A review of histopathological subtypes of ovarian cancer in BRCA-related French Canadian cancer families.

Authors:  Patricia N Tonin; Christine M Maugard; Chantal Perret; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Diane M Provencher
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation prevalence and clinical characteristics of a population-based series of ovarian cancer cases from Denmark.

Authors:  Marie Soegaard; Susanne Kruger Kjaer; Mark Cox; Eva Wozniak; Estrid Høgdall; Claus Høgdall; Jan Blaakaer; Ian J Jacobs; Simon A Gayther; Susan J Ramus
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  2 in total

1.  Implementation and outcomes of telephone disclosure of clinical BRCA1/2 test results.

Authors:  Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Mary Daly; Evelyn Stevens; Dominique Fetzer; Andrea Forman; Lisa Bealin; Christina Rybak; Candace Peterson; Melanie Corbman; Angela R Bradbury
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-08-19

2.  Consequences of universal MSI/IHC in screening ENDOMETRIAL cancer patients for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Brittany A L Batte; Amanda S Bruegl; Molly S Daniels; Kari L Ring; Katherine M Dempsey; Bojana Djordjevic; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Bryan M Fellman; Karen H Lu; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.482

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.