Literature DB >> 22438073

Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk by menopausal status, postmenopausal hormone use and a family history of breast cancer.

Lusine Yaghjyan1, Graham A Colditz, Bernard Rosner, Rulla M Tamimi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Few studies have investigated the association between breast density and breast cancer by a family history of breast cancer, menopausal status, and postmenopausal hormone use (PMH). We investigated if associations of breast density and breast cancer differ according to the status of these risk factors.
METHODS: This study included 1,481 incident breast cancer cases diagnosed within the Nurses' Health Study I and II cohorts and 2,779 matched controls. Breast density was measured from digitized film images with computerized techniques. Information on breast cancer risk factors was obtained prospectively from the biennial questionnaires before the date of the cancer diagnosis for cancer cases and their matched controls. The data were analyzed with logistic regression.
RESULTS: Breast cancer risk increased with increasing percent breast density in all strata (p for trend in all subsets <0.0001). The density-related risk of breast cancer was similar in women with and without a family history (OR = 4.00 [95 % CI 2.01-7.94] vs. 3.71 [95 % CI 2.79-4.94] for density ≥50 % vs. <10 %, p for interaction = 0.53). The magnitude of the association between density and breast cancer risk, however, appeared to be stronger in premenopausal women than in postmenopausal women without PMH history (OR = 5.49 [95 % CI 2.44-12.39] vs. 3.02 [95 % CI 1.62-5.63] for density ≥50 % vs. <10 %, p-heterogeneity = 0.17) and appeared to be stronger in postmenopausal women currently using hormones compared with postmenopausal women who never used PMH (OR = 4.50 [95 % CI 2.99-6.78] vs. 3.02, p-heterogeneity = 0.20) or with past hormone use (OR = 4.50 vs. 3.71 [95 % CI 1.90-7.23], p-heterogeneity = 0.23).
CONCLUSIONS: Findings on associations by menopausal status/hormone use are suggestive and should be examined in additional larger studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22438073      PMCID: PMC3831654          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-012-9936-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  29 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harvey; Viktor E Bovbjerg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Breast cancer risk by breast density, menopause, and postmenopausal hormone therapy use.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Andrea J Cook; Diana S M Buist; Steve R Cummings; Celine Vachon; Pamela Vacek; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Genetic models for the familial aggregation of mammographic breast density.

Authors:  Masako Kataoka; Antonis Antoniou; Ruth Warren; Jean Leyland; Judith Brown; Tina Audley; Doug Easton
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lisa J Martin; Olga Melnichouk; Helen Guo; Anna M Chiarelli; T Gregory Hislop; Martin J Yaffe; Salomon Minkin; John L Hopper; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Case-control study of increased mammographic breast density response to hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; Thomas A Sellers; Robert A Vierkant; Fang-Fang Wu; Kathleen R Brandt
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Gillian S Dite; Jennifer Stone; Anoma Gunasekara; Dallas R English; Margaret R E McCredie; Graham G Giles; David Tritchler; Anna Chiarelli; Martin J Yaffe; John L Hopper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups.

Authors:  Giske Ursin; Huiyan Ma; Anna H Wu; Leslie Bernstein; Martine Salane; Yuri R Parisky; Melvin Astrahan; Conchitina C Siozon; Malcolm C Pike
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Endogenous hormone levels, mammographic density, and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Rulla M Tamimi; Celia Byrne; Graham A Colditz; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Mammographic density, lobular involution, and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  O M Ginsburg; L J Martin; N F Boyd
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Estrogen regulation of mammary gland development and breast cancer: amphiregulin takes center stage.

Authors:  Heather L LaMarca; Jeffrey M Rosen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  15 in total

1.  Association of Interactions Between Mammographic Density Phenotypes and Established Risk Factors With Breast Cancer Risk, by Tumor Subtype and Menopausal Status.

Authors:  Hongjie Chen; Lusine Yaghjyan; Christopher Li; Ulrike Peters; Bernard Rosner; Sara Lindström; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Interaction of mammographic breast density with menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone use in relation to the risk of aggressive breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Rulla M Tamimi; Kimberly A Bertrand; Christopher G Scott; Matthew R Jensen; V Shane Pankratz; Kathy Brandt; Daniel Visscher; Aaron Norman; Fergus Couch; John Shepherd; Bo Fan; Yunn-Yi Chen; Lin Ma; Andrew H Beck; Steven R Cummings; Karla Kerlikowske; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Family History of Breast Cancer, Breast Density, and Breast Cancer Risk in a U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Population.

Authors:  Thomas P Ahern; Brian L Sprague; Michael C S Bissell; Diana L Miglioretti; Diana S M Buist; Dejana Braithwaite; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Circulating Tumor Cells and Tumor Stem Cells Detection in the Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Yuan-Chun Li; Li-Ping Liu; Hao-Min Zhang; Song Tong
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  Endogenous sex hormones and breast density in young women.

Authors:  Seungyoun Jung; Frank Z Stanczyk; Brian L Egleston; Linda G Snetselaar; Victor J Stevens; John A Shepherd; Linda Van Horn; Erin S LeBlanc; Kenneth Paris; Catherine Klifa; Joanne F Dorgan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Trends in breast biopsy pathology diagnoses among women undergoing mammography in the United States: a report from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Authors:  Kimberly H Allison; Linn A Abraham; Donald L Weaver; Anna N A Tosteson; Heidi D Nelson; Tracy Onega; Berta M Geller; Karla Kerlikowske; Patricia A Carney; Laura E Ichikawa; Diana S M Buist; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk: interactions of percent density, absolute dense, and non-dense areas with breast cancer risk factors.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Bernard Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Breast cancer incidence in a cohort of U.S. flight attendants.

Authors:  Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Jeri L Anderson; Misty J Hein; Mark P Little; Alice J Sigurdson; Lynne E Pinkerton
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  Mammographic density and breast cancer risk by family history in women of white and Asian ancestry.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Kaylae L Nakamura; Christy G Woolcott; Shannon M Conroy; Celia Byrne; Chisato Nagata; Giske Ursin; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 10.  Bi-directional signaling: extracellular matrix and integrin regulation of breast tumor progression.

Authors:  Scott Gehler; Suzanne M Ponik; Kristin M Riching; Patricia J Keely
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.807

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.