Literature DB >> 19336563

Genetic models for the familial aggregation of mammographic breast density.

Masako Kataoka1, Antonis Antoniou, Ruth Warren, Jean Leyland, Judith Brown, Tina Audley, Doug Easton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mammographic breast density (MBD) has a strong genetic component. Investigating the genetic models for mammographic density may provide further insights into the genetic factors affecting breast cancer risk.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the familial aggregation of MBD and investigate the genetic models of susceptibility.
METHODS: We used data on 746 women from 305 families participating in the Sisters in Breast Screening study. Retrieved mammograms were digitized, and percent mammographic density was determined using the Cumulus software. Linear regression analysis was done to identify the factors that are associated with mammographic density and a multivariate regression model was constructed. Familial correlations between relative pairs were calculated using the residuals from these models. Genetic models of susceptibility were investigated using segregation analysis.
RESULTS: After adjusting for covariates, the intraclass correlation coefficient among the residuals was 0.26 (95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.36) in sister-sister pairs and 0.67 (0.27-1.00) among the monozygotic twin pairs. The most parsimonious model was a Mendelian single major gene model in which an allele with population frequency 0.39 (95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.46) influenced mammographic density in an additive fashion. This model explained 66% of the residual variance.
CONCLUSION: These results confirm that MBD has a strong heritable basis, and suggest that major genes may explain some of the familial aggregation. These results may have implications for the search of genes that control mammographic density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19336563     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  12 in total

1.  Mammographic breast density and breast cancer: evidence of a shared genetic basis.

Authors:  Jajini S Varghese; Deborah J Thompson; Kyriaki Michailidou; Sara Lindström; Clare Turnbull; Judith Brown; Jean Leyland; Ruth M L Warren; Robert N Luben; Ruth J Loos; Nicholas J Wareham; Johanna Rommens; Andrew D Paterson; Lisa J Martin; Celine M Vachon; Christopher G Scott; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Fergus J Couch; Carmel Apicella; Melissa C Southey; Jennifer Stone; Jingmei Li; Louise Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Norman F Boyd; Per Hall; John L Hopper; Rulla M Tamimi; Nazneen Rahman; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Heritability of mammographic breast density.

Authors:  D Gareth Evans; Elke M van Veen; Anthony Howell; Susan Astley
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-12

3.  Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk by menopausal status, postmenopausal hormone use and a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Bernard Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Novel Associations between Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants and Risk-Predicting Mammographic Density Measures.

Authors:  Jennifer Stone; Deborah J Thompson; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Christopher Scott; Rulla M Tamimi; Sara Lindstrom; Peter Kraft; Aditi Hazra; Jingmei Li; Louise Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Per Hall; Matt Jensen; Julie Cunningham; Janet E Olson; Kristen Purrington; Fergus J Couch; Judith Brown; Jean Leyland; Ruth M L Warren; Robert N Luben; Kay-Tee Khaw; Paula Smith; Nicholas J Wareham; Sebastian M Jud; Katharina Heusinger; Matthias W Beckmann; Julie A Douglas; Kaanan P Shah; Heang-Ping Chan; Mark A Helvie; Loic Le Marchand; Laurence N Kolonel; Christy Woolcott; Gertraud Maskarinec; Christopher Haiman; Graham G Giles; Laura Baglietto; Kavitha Krishnan; Melissa C Southey; Carmel Apicella; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Giske Ursin; Grethe I Grenaker Alnaes; Vessela N Kristensen; Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale; Inger Torhild Gram; Manjeet K Bolla; Qin Wang; Kyriaki Michailidou; Joe Dennis; Jacques Simard; Paul Pharoah; Alison M Dunning; Douglas F Easton; Peter A Fasching; V Shane Pankratz; John L Hopper; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Mammographic density does not differ between unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women at low-to-average risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Jennifer T Loud; Catherine K Chow; Sheila A Prindiville; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Peter W Soballe; Claudia Giambartolomei; Phuong L Mai; Claudia E Galbo; Kathryn Nichols; Kathleen A Calzone; Celine Vachon; Mitchell H Gail; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Mammographic density and breast cancer risk by family history in women of white and Asian ancestry.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Kaylae L Nakamura; Christy G Woolcott; Shannon M Conroy; Celia Byrne; Chisato Nagata; Giske Ursin; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  No evidence that protein truncating variants in BRIP1 are associated with breast cancer risk: implications for gene panel testing.

Authors:  Douglas F Easton; Fabienne Lesueur; Brennan Decker; Kyriaki Michailidou; Jun Li; Jamie Allen; Craig Luccarini; Karen A Pooley; Mitul Shah; Manjeet K Bolla; Qin Wang; Joe Dennis; Jamil Ahmad; Ella R Thompson; Francesca Damiola; Maroulio Pertesi; Catherine Voegele; Noura Mebirouk; Nivonirina Robinot; Geoffroy Durand; Nathalie Forey; Robert N Luben; Shahana Ahmed; Kristiina Aittomäki; Hoda Anton-Culver; Volker Arndt; Caroline Baynes; Matthias W Beckman; Javier Benitez; David Van Den Berg; William J Blot; Natalia V Bogdanova; Stig E Bojesen; Hermann Brenner; Jenny Chang-Claude; Kee Seng Chia; Ji-Yeob Choi; Don M Conroy; Angela Cox; Simon S Cross; Kamila Czene; Hatef Darabi; Peter Devilee; Mikael Eriksson; Peter A Fasching; Jonine Figueroa; Henrik Flyger; Florentia Fostira; Montserrat García-Closas; Graham G Giles; Gord Glendon; Anna González-Neira; Pascal Guénel; Christopher A Haiman; Per Hall; Steven N Hart; Mikael Hartman; Maartje J Hooning; Chia-Ni Hsiung; Hidemi Ito; Anna Jakubowska; Paul A James; Esther M John; Nichola Johnson; Michael Jones; Maria Kabisch; Daehee Kang; Veli-Matti Kosma; Vessela Kristensen; Diether Lambrechts; Na Li; Annika Lindblom; Jirong Long; Artitaya Lophatananon; Jan Lubinski; Arto Mannermaa; Siranoush Manoukian; Sara Margolin; Keitaro Matsuo; Alfons Meindl; Gillian Mitchell; Kenneth Muir; Ines Nevelsteen; Ans van den Ouweland; Paolo Peterlongo; Sze Yee Phuah; Katri Pylkäs; Simone M Rowley; Suleeporn Sangrajrang; Rita K Schmutzler; Chen-Yang Shen; Xiao-Ou Shu; Melissa C Southey; Harald Surowy; Anthony Swerdlow; Soo H Teo; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Ian Tomlinson; Diana Torres; Thérèse Truong; Celine Vachon; Senno Verhoef; Michelle Wong-Brown; Wei Zheng; Ying Zheng; Heli Nevanlinna; Rodney J Scott; Irene L Andrulis; Anna H Wu; John L Hopper; Fergus J Couch; Robert Winqvist; Barbara Burwinkel; Elinor J Sawyer; Marjanka K Schmidt; Anja Rudolph; Thilo Dörk; Hiltrud Brauch; Ute Hamann; Susan L Neuhausen; Roger L Milne; Olivia Fletcher; Paul D P Pharoah; Ian G Campbell; Alison M Dunning; Florence Le Calvez-Kelm; David E Goldgar; Sean V Tavtigian; Georgia Chenevix-Trench
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Mammographic density and breast cancer in women from high risk families.

Authors:  Teresa Ramón Y Cajal; Isabel Chirivella; Josefa Miranda; Alexandre Teule; Ángel Izquierdo; Judith Balmaña; Ana Beatriz Sánchez-Heras; Gemma Llort; David Fisas; Virginia Lope; Elena Hernández-Agudo; María José Juan-Fita; Isabel Tena; Luis Robles; Carmen Guillén-Ponce; Pedro Pérez-Segura; Mari Sol Luque-Molina; Susana Hernando-Polo; Mónica Salinas; Joan Brunet; María Dolores Salas-Trejo; Agustí Barnadas; Marina Pollán
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2 mutation status: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Hui Li; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene; Catherine K Chow; Li Lan; Sheila A Prindiville; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Peter W Soballe; Claudia Giambartolomei; Phuong L Mai; Claudia E Galbo; Kathryn Nichols; Kathleen A Calzone; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Mitchell H Gail; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Rare, protein-truncating variants in ATM, CHEK2 and PALB2, but not XRCC2, are associated with increased breast cancer risks.

Authors:  Brennan Decker; Jamie Allen; Craig Luccarini; Karen A Pooley; Mitul Shah; Manjeet K Bolla; Qin Wang; Shahana Ahmed; Caroline Baynes; Don M Conroy; Judith Brown; Robert Luben; Elaine A Ostrander; Paul Dp Pharoah; Alison M Dunning; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 6.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.