Literature DB >> 25371447

Endogenous sex hormones and breast density in young women.

Seungyoun Jung1, Frank Z Stanczyk2, Brian L Egleston3, Linda G Snetselaar4, Victor J Stevens5, John A Shepherd6, Linda Van Horn7, Erin S LeBlanc5, Kenneth Paris8, Catherine Klifa9, Joanne F Dorgan10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer and reflects epithelial and stromal content. Breast tissue is particularly sensitive to hormonal stimuli before it fully differentiates following the first full-term pregnancy. Few studies have examined associations between sex hormones and breast density among young women.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study among 180 women ages 25 to 29 years old who participated in the Dietary Intervention Study in Children 2006 Follow-up Study. Eighty-five percent of participants attended a clinic visit during their luteal phase of menstrual cycle. Magnetic resonance imaging measured the percentage of dense breast volume (%DBV), absolute dense breast volume (ADBV), and absolute nondense breast volume (ANDBV). Multiple-linear mixed-effect regression models were used to evaluate the association of sex hormones and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) with %DBV, ADBV, and ANDBV.
RESULTS: Testosterone was significantly positively associated with %DBV and ADBV. The multivariable geometric mean of %DBV and ADBV across testosterone quartiles increased from 16.5% to 20.3% and from 68.6 to 82.3 cm(3), respectively (Ptrend ≤ 0.03). There was no association of %DBV or ADBV with estrogens, progesterone, non-SHBG-bound testosterone, or SHBG (Ptrend ≥ 0.27). Neither sex hormones nor SHBG was associated with ANDBV except progesterone; however, the progesterone result was nonsignificant in analysis restricted to women in the luteal phase.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a modest positive association between testosterone and breast density in young women. IMPACT: Hormonal influences at critical periods may contribute to morphologic differences in the breast associated with breast cancer risk later in life. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25371447      PMCID: PMC4323882          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  81 in total

1.  Age-related lobular involution and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Tia R Milanese; Lynn C Hartmann; Thomas A Sellers; Marlene H Frost; Robert A Vierkant; Shaun D Maloney; V Shane Pankratz; Amy C Degnim; Celine M Vachon; Carol A Reynolds; Romayne A Thompson; L Joseph Melton; Ellen L Goode; Daniel W Visscher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The combined oral contraceptive pill -- recent developments, risks and benefits.

Authors:  Monica V Dragoman
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 5.237

3.  Mammographic densities and circulating hormones: a cross-sectional study in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Jihae J Noh; Gertraud Maskarinec; Ian Pagano; Leo W-K Cheung; Frank Z Stanczyk
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Aromatase and breast cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  N M Probst-Hensch; S A Ingles; A T Diep; R W Haile; F Z Stanczyk; L N Kolonel; B E Henderson
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.678

5.  Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Endogenous aromatization of testosterone results in growth stimulation of the human MCF-7 breast cancer cell line.

Authors:  K Sonne-Hansen; A E Lykkesfeldt
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 7.  Interactions of sex hormone-binding globulin with target cells.

Authors:  William Rosner; Daniel J Hryb; Scott M Kahn; Atif M Nakhla; Nicholas A Romas
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 8.  Differentiation of the mammary gland and susceptibility to carcinogenesis.

Authors:  J Russo; L K Tay; I H Russo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  The association of breast mitogens with mammographic densities.

Authors:  N F Boyd; J Stone; L J Martin; R Jong; E Fishell; M Yaffe; G Hammond; S Minkin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  Lisa J Martin; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  6 in total

1.  Mammographic Density and Circulating Sex Hormones: a Cross-Sectional Study in Postmenopausal Korean Women.

Authors:  Kayoung Lee; Jung Eun Yoo; Tuong Linh Nguyen; John Llewelyn Hopper; Yun-Mi Song
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.869

2.  Circulating Hormones and Mammographic Density in Premenopausal Women.

Authors:  Kimberly A Bertrand; A Heather Eliassen; Susan E Hankinson; Bernard A Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.869

3.  Hormone and receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK) pathway gene expression in plasma and mammographic breast density in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Rachel Mintz; Mei Wang; Shuai Xu; Graham A Colditz; Chris Markovic; Adetunji T Toriola
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 6.466

4.  Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide.

Authors:  Anya Burton; Gertraud Maskarinec; Beatriz Perez-Gomez; Celine Vachon; Hui Miao; Martín Lajous; Ruy López-Ridaura; Megan Rice; Ana Pereira; Maria Luisa Garmendia; Rulla M Tamimi; Kimberly Bertrand; Ava Kwong; Giske Ursin; Eunjung Lee; Samera A Qureshi; Huiyan Ma; Sarah Vinnicombe; Sue Moss; Steve Allen; Rose Ndumia; Sudhir Vinayak; Soo-Hwang Teo; Shivaani Mariapun; Farhana Fadzli; Beata Peplonska; Agnieszka Bukowska; Chisato Nagata; Jennifer Stone; John Hopper; Graham Giles; Vahit Ozmen; Mustafa Erkin Aribal; Joachim Schüz; Carla H Van Gils; Johanna O P Wanders; Reza Sirous; Mehri Sirous; John Hipwell; Jisun Kim; Jong Won Lee; Caroline Dickens; Mikael Hartman; Kee-Seng Chia; Christopher Scott; Anna M Chiarelli; Linda Linton; Marina Pollan; Anath Arzee Flugelman; Dorria Salem; Rasha Kamal; Norman Boyd; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Valerie McCormack
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Does circulating progesterone mediate the associations of single nucleotide polymorphisms in progesterone receptor (PGR)-related genes with mammographic breast density in premenopausal women?

Authors:  Jingqin Luo; Adetunji T Toriola; Favour A Akinjiyan; Yunan Han
Journal:  Discov Oncol       Date:  2021-11-03

Review 6.  Field cancerization in breast cancer.

Authors:  Emanuela Gadaleta; Graeme J Thorn; Helen Ross-Adams; Louise J Jones; Claude Chelala
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 9.883

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.