Literature DB >> 28096200

Family History of Breast Cancer, Breast Density, and Breast Cancer Risk in a U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Population.

Thomas P Ahern1, Brian L Sprague2, Michael C S Bissell3, Diana L Miglioretti3,4, Diana S M Buist4, Dejana Braithwaite5, Karla Kerlikowske5,6.   

Abstract

Background: The utility of incorporating detailed family history into breast cancer risk prediction hinges on its independent contribution to breast cancer risk. We evaluated associations between detailed family history and breast cancer risk while accounting for breast density.
Methods: We followed 222,019 participants ages 35 to 74 in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, of whom 2,456 developed invasive breast cancer. We calculated standardized breast cancer risks within joint strata of breast density and simple (1st-degree female relative) or detailed (first-degree, second-degree, or first- and second-degree female relative) breast cancer family history. We fit log-binomial models to estimate age-specific breast cancer associations for simple and detailed family history, accounting for breast density.
Results: Simple first-degree family history was associated with increased breast cancer risk compared with no first-degree history [Risk ratio (RR), 1.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.0-2.1 at age 40; RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.7 at age 50; RR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6 at age 60; RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5 at age 70). Breast cancer associations with detailed family history were strongest for women with first- and second-degree family history compared with no history (RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.2 at age 40); this association weakened in higher age groups (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.88-1.5 at age 70). Associations did not change substantially when adjusted for breast density.Conclusions: Even with adjustment for breast density, a history of breast cancer in both first- and second-degree relatives is more strongly associated with breast cancer than simple first-degree family history.Impact: Future efforts to improve breast cancer risk prediction models should evaluate detailed family history as a risk factor. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(6); 938-44. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28096200      PMCID: PMC5457358          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  27 in total

1.  Cumulative risk of breast cancer to age 70 years according to risk factor status: data from the Nurses' Health Study.

Authors:  G A Colditz; B Rosner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Does nondifferential misclassification of exposure always bias a true effect toward the null value?

Authors:  M Dosemeci; S Wacholder; J H Lubin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lisa J Martin; Olga Melnichouk; Helen Guo; Anna M Chiarelli; T Gregory Hislop; Martin J Yaffe; Salomon Minkin; John L Hopper; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-27       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Tice; Steven R Cummings; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Laura Ichikawa; William E Barlow; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Population-based study of the prevalence of family history of cancer: implications for cancer screening and prevention.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; Paula Yoon; Ramal Moonesinghe; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement.

Authors:  Hatef Darabi; Kamila Czene; Wanting Zhao; Jianjun Liu; Per Hall; Keith Humphreys
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 9.  Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density.

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  BOADICEA breast cancer risk prediction model: updates to cancer incidences, tumour pathology and web interface.

Authors:  A J Lee; A P Cunningham; K B Kuchenbaecker; N Mavaddat; D F Easton; A C Antoniou
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

1.  Family History and Breast Cancer Risk Among Older Women in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Cohort.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Diana L Miglioretti; Weiwei Zhu; Joshua Demb; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Brian Sprague; Jeffrey A Tice; Tracy Onega; Louise M Henderson; Diana S M Buist; Elad Ziv; Louise C Walter; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Assessment of common risk factors and validation of the Gail model for breast cancer: A hospital-based study from Western India.

Authors:  Naveen Kumar; Vinit Singh; Garima Mehta
Journal:  Tzu Chi Med J       Date:  2020-04-10

3.  What Factors Influence Women's Perceptions of their Systemic Recurrence Risk after Breast Cancer Treatment?

Authors:  Kamaria L Lee; Nancy K Janz; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Reshma Jagsi; Lauren P Wallner; Allison W Kurian; Steven J Katz; Paul Abrahamse; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.749

Review 4.  Epidemiological characteristics of and risk factors for breast cancer in the world.

Authors:  Zohre Momenimovahed; Hamid Salehiniya
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2019-04-10

5.  Assessing the clinical utility of genetic risk scores for targeted cancer screening.

Authors:  Carly A Conran; Zhuqing Shi; William Kyle Resurreccion; Rong Na; Brian T Helfand; Elena Genova; Siqun Lilly Zheng; Charles B Brendler; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 5.531

6.  Cost-effectiveness of using artificial intelligence versus polygenic risk score to guide breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Shweta Mital; Hai V Nguyen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Age at initiation of screening mammography by family history of breast cancer in the breast cancer surveillance consortium.

Authors:  Danielle D Durham; Megan C Roberts; Carly P Khan; Linn A Abraham; Robert A Smith; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Curcumin suppresses tumorigenesis by ferroptosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Xuelei Cao; Yao Li; Yongbin Wang; Tao Yu; Chao Zhu; Xuezhi Zhang; Jialiang Guan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.