BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: Dietary assessment in children is difficult, suggesting a need to develop more objective biomarkers of intake. Resonance Raman spectroscopy (RRS) is a non-invasive, validated method of measuring carotenoid status in skin as a biomarker of fruit/vegetable intake. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of using RRS in preschool children, to describe inter-individual variability in skin carotenoid status and to identify factors associated with the biomarker in this population. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 381 economically disadvantaged preschoolers in urban centers in Connecticut (USA). In all, 85.5% were black non-Hispanic or Hispanic/Latino, and 14.1% were obese and 16.9% were overweight by age- and sex-specific body mass index (BMI) percentiles. Children had their skin carotenoid status assessed by RRS in the palm of the hand. Fruit/vegetable consumption was assessed by a brief parent/guardian-completed food frequency screener and a liking survey. RESULTS: We observed inter-individual variation in RRS values that was nearly normally distributed. In multiple regression analysis, higher carotenoid status, measured by RRS, was positively associated with fruit/vegetable consumption (P=0.02) and fruit/vegetable preference (P<0.01). Lower carotenoid status was observed among younger children, those participating in the US Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and those with greater adiposity (P<0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: We observed wide variability in skin carotenoid status in a population of young children, as assessed by RRS. Parent-reported fruit/vegetable intake and several demographic factors were significantly associated with RRS-measured skin carotenoid status. We recommend further development of this biomarker in children, including evaluating response to controlled interventions.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: Dietary assessment in children is difficult, suggesting a need to develop more objective biomarkers of intake. Resonance Raman spectroscopy (RRS) is a non-invasive, validated method of measuring carotenoid status in skin as a biomarker of fruit/vegetable intake. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of using RRS in preschool children, to describe inter-individual variability in skin carotenoid status and to identify factors associated with the biomarker in this population. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 381 economically disadvantaged preschoolers in urban centers in Connecticut (USA). In all, 85.5% were black non-Hispanic or Hispanic/Latino, and 14.1% were obese and 16.9% were overweight by age- and sex-specific body mass index (BMI) percentiles. Children had their skin carotenoid status assessed by RRS in the palm of the hand. Fruit/vegetable consumption was assessed by a brief parent/guardian-completed food frequency screener and a liking survey. RESULTS: We observed inter-individual variation in RRS values that was nearly normally distributed. In multiple regression analysis, higher carotenoid status, measured by RRS, was positively associated with fruit/vegetable consumption (P=0.02) and fruit/vegetable preference (P<0.01). Lower carotenoid status was observed among younger children, those participating in the US Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and those with greater adiposity (P<0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: We observed wide variability in skin carotenoid status in a population of young children, as assessed by RRS. Parent-reported fruit/vegetable intake and several demographic factors were significantly associated with RRS-measured skin carotenoid status. We recommend further development of this biomarker in children, including evaluating response to controlled interventions.
Authors: Susan T Mayne; Brenda Cartmel; Stephanie Scarmo; Haiqun Lin; David J Leffell; Erin Welch; Igor Ermakov; Prakash Bhosale; Paul S Bernstein; Werner Gellermann Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: M L Neuhouser; C L Rock; A L Eldridge; A R Kristal; R E Patterson; D A Cooper; D Neumark-Sztainer; L J Cheskin; M D Thornquist Journal: J Nutr Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: E Giovannucci; A Ascherio; E B Rimm; M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; W C Willett Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1995-12-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: L Le Marchand; J H Hankin; L N Kolonel; G R Beecher; L R Wilkens; L P Zhao Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 1993 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Paul S Bernstein; Mohsen Sharifzadeh; Aihua Liu; Igor Ermakov; Kelly Nelson; Xiaoming Sheng; Cynthia Panish; Bonnie Carlstrom; Robert O Hoffman; Werner Gellermann Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Donna Spruijt-Metz; Cheng K Fred Wen; Brooke M Bell; Stephen Intille; Jeannie S Huang; Tom Baranowski Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-08-19 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Marcela D Radtke; Stephanie Jilcott Pitts; Lisa Jahns; Gina C Firnhaber; Brittany M Loofbourrow; April Zeng; Rachel E Scherr Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Susan T Mayne; Brenda Cartmel; Stephanie Scarmo; Lisa Jahns; Igor V Ermakov; Werner Gellermann Journal: Arch Biochem Biophys Date: 2013-06-30 Impact factor: 4.013
Authors: Gary M Chan; Melissa M Chan; Werner Gellermann; Igor Ermakov; Maia Ermakova; Prakash Bhosale; Paul Bernstein; Carrie Rau Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Stephanie Bell Jilcott Pitts; Lisa Jahns; Qiang Wu; Nancy E Moran; Ronny A Bell; Kimberly P Truesdale; Melissa N Laska Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 4.022