Literature DB >> 7473833

Intake of carotenoids and retinol in relation to risk of prostate cancer.

E Giovannucci1, A Ascherio, E B Rimm, M J Stampfer, G A Colditz, W C Willett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several human studies have observed a direct association between retinol (vitamin A) intake and risk of prostate cancer; other studies have found either an inverse association or no association of intake of beta-carotene (the major provitamin A) with risk of prostate cancer. Data regarding carotenoids other than beta-carotene in relation to prostate cancer risk are sparse.
PURPOSE: We concluded a prospective cohort study to examine the relationship between the intake of various carotenoids, retinol, fruits, and vegetables and the risk of prostate cancer.
METHODS: Using responses to a validated, semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire mailed to participants in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study in 1986, we assessed dietary intake for a 1-year period for a cohort of 47,894 eligible subjects initially free of diagnosed cancer. Follow-up questionnaires were sent to the entire cohort in 1988, 1990, and 1992. We calculated the relative risk (RR) for each of the upper categories of intake of a specific food or nutrient by dividing the incidence rate of prostate cancer among men in each of these categories by the rate among men in the lowest intake level. All P values resulted from two-sided tests.
RESULTS: Between 1986 and 1992, 812 new cases of prostate cancer, including 773 non-stage A1 cases, were documented. Intakes of the carotenoids beta-carotene, alpha-carotene, lutein, and beta-cryptoxanthin were not associated with risk of non-stage A1 prostate cancer; only lycopene intake was related to lower risk (age- and energy-adjusted RR = 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64-0.99 for high versus low quintile of intake; P for trend = .04). Of 46 vegetables and fruits or related products, four were significantly associated with lower prostate cancer risk; of the four--tomato sauce (P for trend = .001), tomatoes (P for trend = .03), and pizza (P for trend = .05), but not strawberries--were primary sources of lycopene. Combined intake of tomatoes, tomato sauce, tomato juice, and pizza (which accounted for 82% of lycopene intake) was inversely associated with risk of prostate cancer (multivariate RR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.44-0.95, for consumption frequency greater than 10 versus less than 1.5 servings per week; P for trend = .01) and advanced (stages C and D) prostate cancers (multivariate RR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.22-1.00; P for trend = .03). No consistent association was observed for dietary retinol and risk of prostate cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that intake of lycopene or other compounds in tomatoes may reduce prostate cancer risk, but other measured carotenoids are unrelated to risk. IMPLICATIONS: Our findings support recommendations to increase vegetable and fruit consumption to reduce cancer incidence but suggest that tomato-based foods may be especially beneficial regarding prostate cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7473833     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/87.23.1767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  141 in total

1.  Phytochemical malabsorption:clinical significance.

Authors:  Mark L Wahlqvist; Naiyana Wattanapenpaiboon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Racial bias in federal nutrition policy, Part II: Weak guidelines take a disproportionate toll.

Authors:  P Bertron; N D Barnard; M Mills
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 3.  Tomato lycopene and its role in human health and chronic diseases.

Authors:  S Agarwal; A V Rao
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-09-19       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  An interaction between carotene-15,15'-monooxygenase expression and consumption of a tomato or lycopene-containing diet impacts serum and testicular testosterone.

Authors:  Nikki A Ford; Nancy Engelmann Moran; Joshua W Smith; Steven K Clinton; John W Erdman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 5.  Time course of risk factors in cancer etiology and progression.

Authors:  Esther K Wei; Kathleen Y Wolin; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Associations between unprocessed red and processed meat, poultry, seafood and egg intake and the risk of prostate cancer: A pooled analysis of 15 prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Kana Wu; Donna Spiegelman; Tao Hou; Demetrius Albanes; Naomi E Allen; Sonja I Berndt; Piet A van den Brandt; Graham G Giles; Edward Giovannucci; R Alexandra Goldbohm; Gary G Goodman; Phyllis J Goodman; Niclas Håkansson; Manami Inoue; Timothy J Key; Laurence N Kolonel; Satu Männistö; Marjorie L McCullough; Marian L Neuhouser; Yikyung Park; Elizabeth A Platz; Jeannette M Schenk; Rashmi Sinha; Meir J Stampfer; Victoria L Stevens; Shoichiro Tsugane; Kala Visvanathan; Lynne R Wilkens; Alicja Wolk; Regina G Ziegler; Stephanie A Smith-Warner
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Serum antioxidant capacity, biochemical profile and body composition of breast cancer survivors in a randomized Mediterranean dietary intervention study.

Authors:  Maria Skouroliakou; D Grosomanidis; P Massara; C Kostara; P Papandreou; D Ntountaniotis; G Xepapadakis
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 5.614

8.  Chemoprevention and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Masood A Khan; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

9.  The potential for prostate cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Otis W Brawley
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

Review 10.  Molecular mechanisms of silibinin-mediated cancer chemoprevention with major emphasis on prostate cancer.

Authors:  Harold Ting; Gagan Deep; Rajesh Agarwal
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.