Stephanie Bell Jilcott Pitts1, Lisa Jahns2, Qiang Wu3, Nancy E Moran4, Ronny A Bell1, Kimberly P Truesdale5, Melissa N Laska6. 1. 1Department of Public Health,East Carolina University,600 Moye Boulevard,Mailstop 660,Greenville,NC 27834,USA. 2. 2USDA/ARS Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center,Grand Forks,ND,USA. 3. 3Department of Biostatistics,East Carolina University,Greenville,NC,USA. 4. 4USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center,Department of Pediatrics,Baylor College of Medicine,Houston,TX,USA. 5. 5Department of Nutrition,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,Chapel Hill,NC,USA. 6. 6Division of Epidemiology & Community Health,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,MN,USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, reliability and validity of reflection spectroscopy (RS) to assess skin carotenoids in a racially diverse sample. DESIGN: Study 1 was a cross-sectional study of corner store customers (n 479) who completed the National Cancer Institute Fruit and Vegetable Screener as well as RS measures. Feasibility was assessed by examining the time it took to complete three RS measures, reliability was assessed by examining the variation between three RS measures, and validity was examined by correlation with self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption. In Study 2, validity was assessed in a smaller sample (n 30) by examining associations between RS measures and dietary carotenoids, fruits and vegetables as calculated from a validated FFQ and plasma carotenoids. SETTING: Eastern North Carolina, USA. RESULTS: It took on average 94·0 s to complete three RS readings per person. The average variation between three readings for each participant was 6·8 %. In Study 2, in models adjusted for age, race and sex, there were statistically significant associations between RS measures and (i) FFQ-estimated carotenoid intake (P<0·0001); (ii) FFQ-estimated fruit and vegetable consumption (P<0·010); and (iii) plasma carotenoids (P<0·0001). CONCLUSIONS: RS is a potentially improved method to approximate fruit and vegetable consumption among diverse participants. RS is portable and easy to use in field-based public health nutrition settings. More research is needed to investigate validity and sensitivity in diverse populations.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, reliability and validity of reflection spectroscopy (RS) to assess skin carotenoids in a racially diverse sample. DESIGN: Study 1 was a cross-sectional study of corner store customers (n 479) who completed the National Cancer Institute Fruit and Vegetable Screener as well as RS measures. Feasibility was assessed by examining the time it took to complete three RS measures, reliability was assessed by examining the variation between three RS measures, and validity was examined by correlation with self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption. In Study 2, validity was assessed in a smaller sample (n 30) by examining associations between RS measures and dietary carotenoids, fruits and vegetables as calculated from a validated FFQ and plasma carotenoids. SETTING: Eastern North Carolina, USA. RESULTS: It took on average 94·0 s to complete three RS readings per person. The average variation between three readings for each participant was 6·8 %. In Study 2, in models adjusted for age, race and sex, there were statistically significant associations between RS measures and (i) FFQ-estimated carotenoid intake (P<0·0001); (ii) FFQ-estimated fruit and vegetable consumption (P<0·010); and (iii) plasma carotenoids (P<0·0001). CONCLUSIONS:RS is a potentially improved method to approximate fruit and vegetable consumption among diverse participants. RS is portable and easy to use in field-based public health nutrition settings. More research is needed to investigate validity and sensitivity in diverse populations.
Entities:
Keywords:
Carotenoids; Fruit; Health promotion; Vegetables
Authors: N V Dhurandhar; D Schoeller; A W Brown; S B Heymsfield; D Thomas; T I A Sørensen; J R Speakman; M Jeansonne; D B Allison Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Dale A Schoeller; Diana Thomas; Edward Archer; Steven B Heymsfield; Steven N Blair; Michael I Goran; James O Hill; Richard L Atkinson; Barbara E Corkey; John Foreyt; Nikhil V Dhurandhar; John G Kral; Kevin D Hall; Barbara C Hansen; Berit Lilienthal Heitmann; Eric Ravussin; David B Allison Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Linda M Oude Griep; W M Monique Verschuren; Daan Kromhout; Marga C Ocké; Johanna M Geleijnse Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Susan T Mayne; Brenda Cartmel; Stephanie Scarmo; Haiqun Lin; David J Leffell; Erin Welch; Igor Ermakov; Prakash Bhosale; Paul S Bernstein; Werner Gellermann Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Susan T Mayne; Brenda Cartmel; Stephanie Scarmo; Lisa Jahns; Igor V Ermakov; Werner Gellermann Journal: Arch Biochem Biophys Date: 2013-06-30 Impact factor: 4.013
Authors: Lisa Jahns; LuAnn K Johnson; Susan T Mayne; Brenda Cartmel; Matthew J Picklo; Igor V Ermakov; Werner Gellermann; Leah D Whigham Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-07-09 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Marcela D Radtke; Stephanie Jilcott Pitts; Lisa Jahns; Gina C Firnhaber; Brittany M Loofbourrow; April Zeng; Rachel E Scherr Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Akira Obana; Yuko Gohto; Werner Gellermann; Igor V Ermakov; Hiroyuki Sasano; Takahiko Seto; Paul S Bernstein Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Stephanie B Jilcott Pitts; Qiang Wu; Kimberly P Truesdale; Lindsey Haynes-Maslow; Jared T McGuirt; Alice Ammerman; Ronny Bell; Melissa N Laska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lisa Jahns; LuAnn K Johnson; Zach Conrad; Michael Bukowski; Susan K Raatz; Stephanie Jilcott Pitts; Youfa Wang; Igor V Ermakov; Werner Gellermann Journal: Nutr J Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Emily H Morgan; Meredith L Graham; Grace A Marshall; Karla L Hanson; Rebecca A Seguin-Fowler Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 6.457