OBJECTIVE: To determine low-income consumers' attitudes and behaviour towards fruit and vegetables, in particular issues of access to, affordability of and motivation to eat fruit and vegetables. DESIGN AND SETTING: Questionnaire survey mailed to homes owned by a large UK housing association. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 680 low-income men and women, aged 17-100 years. RESULTS: Age, employment, gender, smoking and marital status all affected attitudes towards access, affordability and motivation to eat fruit and vegetables. Few (7%) participants experienced difficulty in visiting a supermarket at least once a week, despite nearly half having no access to a car for shopping. Fruit and vegetables were affordable to this low-income group in the amounts they habitually bought; purchasing additional fruits and vegetables was seen as prohibitively expensive. Less than 5% felt they had a problem with eating healthily and yet only 18% claimed to eat the recommended 5 or more portions of fruit and vegetables every day. CONCLUSIONS: Supported by research, current UK Government policy is driven by the belief that low-income groups have difficulties in access to and affordability of fruit and vegetables. Findings from this particular group suggest that, of the three potential barriers, access and affordability were only a small part of the 'problem' surrounding low fruit and vegetable consumption. Thus, other possible determinants of greater consequence need to be identified. We suggest focusing attention on motivation to eat fruit and vegetables, since no dietary improvement can be achieved if people do not recognise there is a problem.
OBJECTIVE: To determine low-income consumers' attitudes and behaviour towards fruit and vegetables, in particular issues of access to, affordability of and motivation to eat fruit and vegetables. DESIGN AND SETTING: Questionnaire survey mailed to homes owned by a large UK housing association. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 680 low-income men and women, aged 17-100 years. RESULTS: Age, employment, gender, smoking and marital status all affected attitudes towards access, affordability and motivation to eat fruit and vegetables. Few (7%) participants experienced difficulty in visiting a supermarket at least once a week, despite nearly half having no access to a car for shopping. Fruit and vegetables were affordable to this low-income group in the amounts they habitually bought; purchasing additional fruits and vegetables was seen as prohibitively expensive. Less than 5% felt they had a problem with eating healthily and yet only 18% claimed to eat the recommended 5 or more portions of fruit and vegetables every day. CONCLUSIONS: Supported by research, current UK Government policy is driven by the belief that low-income groups have difficulties in access to and affordability of fruit and vegetables. Findings from this particular group suggest that, of the three potential barriers, access and affordability were only a small part of the 'problem' surrounding low fruit and vegetable consumption. Thus, other possible determinants of greater consequence need to be identified. We suggest focusing attention on motivation to eat fruit and vegetables, since no dietary improvement can be achieved if people do not recognise there is a problem.
Authors: Christina Pollard; Margaret Miller; Richard John Woodman; Rosie Meng; Colin Binns Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-12-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Clara Kayei Chow; Karen Lock; Koon Teo; S V Subramanian; Martin McKee; Salim Yusuf Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2009-03-04 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Sara E Schaefer; Melissa Salazar; Christine Bruhn; Dennis Saviano; Carol Boushey; Marta D Van Loan Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2008-05-28
Authors: S Scarmo; K Henebery; H Peracchio; B Cartmel; H Lin; I V Ermakov; W Gellermann; P S Bernstein; V B Duffy; S T Mayne Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2012-03-21 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Lucia A Leone; Diane Beth; Scott B Ickes; Kathleen Macguire; Erica Nelson; Robert Andrew Smith; Deborah F Tate; Alice S Ammerman Journal: J Hunger Environ Nutr Date: 2012
Authors: Wilma E Waterlander; Anika de Mul; Albertine J Schuit; Jacob C Seidell; Ingrid Hm Steenhuis Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2010-05-19 Impact factor: 6.457