Literature DB >> 8290727

Diagnosing breast implant rupture with MR imaging, US, and mammography.

W A Berg1, C I Caskey, U M Hamper, N D Anderson, B W Chang, S Sheth, E A Zerhouni, J E Kuhlman.   

Abstract

A total of 135 symptomatic women with 262 breast implants were examined with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performed with a body coil, ultrasound (US), or both to determine imaging features of implant rupture. Surgical proof was available for 33 women with 62 implants; 24 were ruptured and 38 were intact. Complicated internal structure was the most reliable predictor of implant rupture: Diffuse low-level echoes were seen on sonograms in 56% of ruptured implants; internal membranes (which correspond to the collapsed implant shell) were seen on MR images in 58% of ruptured implants. Fluid droplets were seen within the silicone in 26% of ruptured implants on MR images. Irregular implant contour can be a sign of rupture but is unreliable. Fluid collections around silicone implants are not a sign of rupture. At present, neither US nor conventional MR imaging with a body coil is sufficiently reliable to advocate routine screening of asymptomatic women with breast implants. Evaluation with MR imaging performed with a surface coil is more reliable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8290727     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.13.6.8290727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  4 in total

1.  Study of breast implant rupture: MRI versus surgical findings.

Authors:  A Vestito; F F Mangieri; A Ancona; C Minervini; V Perchinunno; S Rinaldi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Indications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Consensus document "Attualità in senologia", Florence 2007.

Authors:  F Sardanelli; G M Giuseppetti; G Canavese; L Cataliotti; S Corcione; E Cossu; M Federico; L Marotti; L Martincich; P Panizza; F Podo; M Rosselli Del Turco; C Zuiani; C Alfano; M Bazzocchi; P Belli; S Bianchi; A Cilotti; M Calabrese; L Carbonaro; L Cortesi; C Di Maggio; A Del Maschio; A Esseridou; A Fausto; M Gennaro; R Girometti; R Ienzi; A Luini; S Manoukian; S Morassutt; D Morrone; J Nori; A Orlacchio; F Pane; P Panzarola; R Ponzone; G Simonetti; P Torricelli; G Valeri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Imaging of common breast implants and implant-related complications: A pictorial essay.

Authors:  Amisha T Shah; Bijal B Jankharia
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

4.  Silicone migration to the contralateral axillary lymph nodes and breast after highly cohesive silicone gel implant failure: a case report.

Authors:  Gabriel J Kaufman; Rita A Sakr; Cyrille Inguenault; Isabelle Sarfati; Claude Nos; Krishna B Clough
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-03-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.