Literature DB >> 22427234

Acoustic signal perception in a noisy habitat: lessons from synchronising insects.

M Hartbauer1, M E Siegert, I Fertschai, H Römer.   

Abstract

Acoustically communicating animals often have to cope with ambient noise that has the potential to interfere with the perception of conspecific signals. Here we use the synchronous display of mating signals in males of the tropical katydid Mecopoda elongata in order to assess the influence of nocturnal rainforest noise on signal perception. Loud background noise may disturb chorus synchrony either by masking the signals of males or by interaction of noisy events with the song oscillator. Phase-locked synchrony of males was studied under various signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) using either native noise or the audio component of noise (<9 kHz). Synchronous entrainment was lost at a SNR of -3 dB when native noise was used, whereas with the audio component still 50% of chirp periods matched the pacer period at a SNR of -7 dB. Since the chirp period of solo singing males remained almost unaffected by noise, our results suggest that masking interference limits chorus synchrony by rendering conspecific signals ambiguous. Further, entrainment with periodic artificial signals indicates that synchrony is achieved by ignoring heterospecific signals and attending to a conspecific signal period. Additionally, the encoding of conspecific chirps was studied in an auditory neuron under the same background noise regimes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22427234      PMCID: PMC3357476          DOI: 10.1007/s00359-012-0718-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  16 in total

1.  Contralateral inhibition as a sensory bias: the neural basis for a female preference in a synchronously calling bushcricket, Mecopoda elongata.

Authors:  Heiner Römer; Berthold Hedwig; Swidbert R Ott
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Chirp rate is independent of male condition in a synchronising bushcricket.

Authors:  M Hartbauer; S Kratzer; H Römer
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 2.354

3.  Call patterns and basilar papilla tuning in cricket frogs. I. Differences among populations and between sexes.

Authors:  W Wilczynski; A C Keddy-Hector; M J Ryan
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Neuroethology of female preference in the synchronously singing bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Tettigoniidae; Orthoptera): why do followers call at all?

Authors:  Ismene Fertschai; Jürgen Stradner; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Morphological and physiological regeneration in the auditory system of adult Mecopoda elongata (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  Silke Krüger; Casey S Butler; Reinhard Lakes-Harlan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Efficacy and honesty in communication between relatives.

Authors:  R A Johnstone
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Synchronous, alternating, and phase-locked stridulation by a tropical katydid.

Authors:  E Sismondo
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Signal detection and identification at successive stages of observation.

Authors:  J A Swets; D M Green; D J Getty; J B Swets
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-04

9.  Reliable detection of predator cues in afferent spike trains of a katydid under high background noise levels.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Gerald Radspieler; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Intra-syllabic acoustic signatures used by the king penguin in parent-chick recognition: an experimental approach.

Authors:  T Lengagne; J Lauga; T Aubin
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  9 in total

1.  The importance of invertebrates when considering the impacts of anthropogenic noise.

Authors:  Erica L Morley; Gareth Jones; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Species interactions and the structure of complex communication networks.

Authors:  Joseph A Tobias; Robert Planqué; Dominic L Cram; Nathalie Seddon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genomics: moving behavioural ecology beyond the phenotypic gambit.

Authors:  Clare C Rittschof; Gene E Robinson
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 4.  Rhythm interaction in animal groups: selective attention in communication networks.

Authors:  Michael D Greenfield; Ikkyu Aihara; Guy Amichay; Marianna Anichini; Vivek Nityananda
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.671

5.  Competition and cooperation in a synchronous bushcricket chorus.

Authors:  M Hartbauer; L Haitzinger; M Kainz; H Römer
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 6.  From microseconds to seconds and minutes-time computation in insect hearing.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Heiner Römer
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Rhythm Generation and Rhythm Perception in Insects: The Evolution of Synchronous Choruses.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Heiner Römer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Maintaining acoustic communication at a cocktail party: heterospecific masking noise improves signal detection through frequency separation.

Authors:  M E Siegert; H Römer; M Hartbauer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Evolutionarily conserved coding properties favour the neuronal representation of heterospecific signals of a sympatric katydid species.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kostarakos; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 1.836

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.