Literature DB >> 17234616

Neuroethology of female preference in the synchronously singing bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Tettigoniidae; Orthoptera): why do followers call at all?

Ismene Fertschai1, Jürgen Stradner, Heiner Römer.   

Abstract

Imperfect synchrony between male calls occurs in the acoustically interacting bushcricket Mecopoda elongata, and males establishing the temporal leadership attract more females in choice experiments. An asymmetrical representation of leader and follower signals in pairs of direction-selective neurons of the auditory pathway was suggested to represent the neural basis for the preference of females. We investigated the time-intensity trading effect, which occurs when the temporal advantage of the leader signal is compensated, and can be reversed, by an additional sound pressure level of the follower. In behavioural arena trials the intensity trading of the preference of females for leader signals depends on the playback level; a higher sound pressure level (SPL) is needed for compensation at higher playback levels. We studied the simultaneous neuronal representation of leader and follower signals, and the time-intensity trading function in the pair of omega-neurons in the CNS. Consistent with the behavioural data, the representation of leader and follower signals can be reversed with an additional loudness of the follower, and the steepness of the trading function depends on the playback level. We also implemented data on the neuronal representation of synchronized signals in individual receivers into computer-based agents, which performed phonotaxis in a virtual sound field. Results of these simulations closely resemble those obtained from real females with respect to the overall preference under the various time-intensity trading conditions. Furthermore, in combination with the observed trading functions these simulations demonstrate, that under more realistic field conditions the ultimate success of followers in attracting females is much higher than suggested from arena trials. We discuss the evolutionary consequences for male calling strategies in synchronously calling Orthoptera.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17234616     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  15 in total

1.  Selective attention in a synchronising bushcricket: physiology, behaviour and ecology.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda; Jürgen Stradner; Rohini Balakrishnan; Heinrich Römer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  A precedence effect resolves phantom sound source illusions in the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea.

Authors:  Norman Lee; Damian O Elias; Andrew C Mason
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Processing of simple and complex acoustic signals in a tonotopically organized ear.

Authors:  Jennifer Hummel; Konstantin Wolf; Manfred Kössl; Manuela Nowotny
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Attention-like processes in insects.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Acoustic signal perception in a noisy habitat: lessons from synchronising insects.

Authors:  M Hartbauer; M E Siegert; I Fertschai; H Römer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Sounds, behaviour, and auditory receptors of the armoured ground cricket, Acanthoplus longipes.

Authors:  Kerstin Kowalski; Reinhard Lakes-Harlan
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.857

7.  Neuronal correlates of a preference for leading signals in the synchronizing bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  M E Siegert; H Römer; R Hashim; M Hartbauer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Signalling plasticity and energy saving in a tropical bushcricket.

Authors:  M Hartbauer; A Stabentheiner; H Römer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Competition and cooperation in a synchronous bushcricket chorus.

Authors:  M Hartbauer; L Haitzinger; M Kainz; H Römer
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Male age and female mate choice in a synchronizing katydid.

Authors:  M Hartbauer; M E Siegert; H Römer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.