Literature DB >> 1633554

Call patterns and basilar papilla tuning in cricket frogs. I. Differences among populations and between sexes.

W Wilczynski1, A C Keddy-Hector, M J Ryan.   

Abstract

Male cricket frogs (Acris crepitans) produce a broad-band, high frequency advertisement call with a single spectral peak (the dominant frequency). We measured the dominant frequencies of male calls from six populations in central Texas and one from Indiana and compared them to the tuning of basilar papilla afferents in males and females. Averaging over all populations, mean call dominant frequency was 3.69 kHz, mean male basilar papilla tuning was 3.63 kHz, and mean female basilar papilla tuning was 3.17 kHz. Among populations, mean dominant frequency varied from 3.56 kHz to 3.82 kHz. Dominant frequencies were slightly higher in the more eastern Texas populations occupying pine forest habitats than in the more western populations occupying open grassland habitats. Changes in dominant frequency in a population coincided with changes in tuning of both male and female basilar papillae. Furthermore, within populations females were tuned on average lower than males and lower than the mean dominant frequency of calls in their own population. We suggest that the coincident changes in calls and basilar papilla tuning plus the sexual difference in tuning indicate that female mate choice would be directed toward males from her home population with low frequency calls or toward males from foreign populations with average calls lower in frequency than those in her home population. This in turn suggests that any gene flow between populations would be biased from east to west and from forest to open habitats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1633554     DOI: 10.1159/000114120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  17 in total

1.  Seasonal plasticity of peripheral auditory frequency sensitivity.

Authors:  Joseph A Sisneros; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Assessing stimulus and subject influences on auditory evoked potentials and their relation to peripheral physiology in green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea).

Authors:  Nathan P Buerkle; Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.320

Review 3.  Sensory ecology and perceptual allocation: new prospects for neural networks.

Authors:  Steven M Phelps
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Hearing conspecific vocal signals alters peripheral auditory sensitivity.

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  "To ear is human, to frogive is divine": Bob Capranica's legacy to auditory neuroethology.

Authors:  Andrea Megela Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Auditory brainstem responses in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Nathan P Buerkle; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Two matched filters and the evolution of mating signals in four species of cricket.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kostarakos; Matthias R Hennig; Heiner Römer
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).

Authors:  Ian C Hall; Sarah M N Woolley; Ursula Kwong-Brown; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Radiographic analysis of vocal tract length and its relation to overall body size in two canid species.

Authors:  K Plotsky; D Rendall; T Riede; K Chase
Journal:  J Zool (1987)       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.322

10.  Acoustic, auditory, and morphological divergence in three species of neotropical frog.

Authors:  W Wilczynski; B E McClelland; A S Rand
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.