Literature DB >> 24335986

The importance of invertebrates when considering the impacts of anthropogenic noise.

Erica L Morley1, Gareth Jones, Andrew N Radford.   

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise is now recognized as a major global pollutant. Rapidly burgeoning research has identified impacts on individual behaviour and physiology through to community disruption. To date, however, there has been an almost exclusive focus on vertebrates. Not only does their central role in food webs and in fulfilling ecosystem services make imperative our understanding of how invertebrates are impacted by all aspects of environmental change, but also many of their inherent characteristics provide opportunities to overcome common issues with the current anthropogenic noise literature. Here, we begin by explaining why invertebrates are likely to be affected by anthropogenic noise, briefly reviewing their capacity for hearing and providing evidence that they are capable of evolutionary adaptation and behavioural plasticity in response to natural noise sources. We then discuss the importance of quantifying accurately and fully both auditory ability and noise content, emphasizing considerations of direct relevance to how invertebrates detect sounds. We showcase how studying invertebrates can help with the behavioural bias in the literature, the difficulties in drawing strong, ecologically valid conclusions and the need for studies on fitness impacts. Finally, we suggest avenues of future research using invertebrates that would advance our understanding of the impact of anthropogenic noise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  environmental change; fitness; hearing; insect; noise quantification; pollution

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24335986      PMCID: PMC3871318          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  43 in total

1.  Active auditory mechanics in mosquitoes.

Authors:  M C Göpfert; D Robert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Climate change. Evolutionary response to rapid climate change.

Authors:  William E Bradshaw; Christina M Holzapfel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Using Drosophila for studying fundamental processes in hearing.

Authors:  Qianhao Lu; Pingkalai R Senthilan; Thomas Effertz; Björn Nadrowski; Martin C Göpfert
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 4.  How and why environmental noise impacts animals: an integrative, mechanistic review.

Authors:  Caitlin R Kight; John P Swaddle
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Sander Bot; Jasper Buikx; Marco van der Velde; Jan Komdeur; Carel ten Cate; Hans Slabbekoorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Adaptation to temperate climates.

Authors:  William E Bradshaw; Peter A Zani; Christina M Holzapfel
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Size-dependent physiological responses of shore crabs to single and repeated playback of ship noise.

Authors:  Matthew A Wale; Stephen D Simpson; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Noise pollution changes avian communities and species interactions.

Authors:  Clinton D Francis; Catherine P Ortega; Alexander Cruz
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Experimentally increased noise levels change spatial and singing behaviour.

Authors:  Kirsty Elizabeth McLaughlin; Hansjoerg P Kunc
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  The mechanical basis of Drosophila audition.

Authors:  Martin C Göpfert; Daniel Robert
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  32 in total

1.  Vessel noise pollution as a human threat to fish: assessment of the stress response in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata, Linnaeus 1758).

Authors:  Monica Celi; Francesco Filiciotto; Giulia Maricchiolo; Lucrezia Genovese; Enza Maria Quinci; Vincenzo Maccarrone; Salvatore Mazzola; Mirella Vazzana; Giuseppa Buscaino
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.794

2.  Noise affects resource assessment in an invertebrate.

Authors:  Erin P Walsh; Gareth Arnott; Hansjoerg P Kunc
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Predatory fish sounds can alter crab foraging behaviour and influence bivalve abundance.

Authors:  A Randall Hughes; David A Mann; David L Kimbro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Aquatic noise pollution: implications for individuals, populations, and ecosystems.

Authors:  Hansjoerg P Kunc; Kirsty Elizabeth McLaughlin; Rouven Schmidt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Developmental experience with anthropogenic noise hinders adult mate location in an acoustically signalling invertebrate.

Authors:  Gabrielle A Gurule-Small; Robin M Tinghitella
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Population-level effects of acoustic disturbance in Atlantic cod: a size-structured analysis based on energy budgets.

Authors:  Floor H Soudijn; Tobias van Kooten; Hans Slabbekoorn; André M de Roos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Effects of simulated highway noise on heart rates of larval monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus: implications for roadside habitat suitability.

Authors:  Andrew K Davis; Hayley Schroeder; Ian Yeager; Jana Pearce
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Long-term noise pollution affects seedling recruitment and community composition, with negative effects persisting after removal.

Authors:  Jennifer N Phillips; Sarah E Termondt; Clinton D Francis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Impacts of regular and random noise on the behaviour, growth and development of larval Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua).

Authors:  Sophie L Nedelec; Stephen D Simpson; Erica L Morley; Brendan Nedelec; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Increased noise levels have different impacts on the anti-predator behaviour of two sympatric fish species.

Authors:  Irene K Voellmy; Julia Purser; Stephen D Simpson; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.