Literature DB >> 22415318

Relation between projection positions and X-ray radiation doses during placement of the coronary sinus mapping electrode.

Gang Lin1, Jian-Fei Huang, Hui-He Lu, Lin-Sheng Shi, Jue Wang, Shu-Qing Zhang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To reduce X-ray radiation injury, we investigated the relation between projection positions and X-ray radiation doses when a coronary sinus mapping electrode was placed.
METHODS: There were 400 patients in whom a coronary sinus mapping electrode was placed for intracardiac electrophysiologic examination or radio-frequency catheter ablation in our hospital between 1 June 2008 and 31 May 2011. The doctors who placed the coronary sinus mapping electrode and the projection positions including posteroanterior, left anterior oblique 45°, and right anterior oblique 30° projection positions were randomly selected. X-ray doses were recorded when the coronary sinus mapping electrode was placed, and then, these were compared between the three projection positions.
RESULTS: The X-ray dose was significantly lower in the right anterior oblique 30° projection position (50.01 ± 11.38 mGy) than in the posteroanterior projection position (68.05 ± 18.85 mGy, q = 12.924, p = 0.000) and the left anterior oblique 45° projection position (71.66 ± 16.95 mGy, q = 15.214, p = 0.000). There were no statistical significances in X-ray doses between the posteroanterior and the left anterior oblique 45° projection positions (p = 0.066) and different operators (p = 0.985).
CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, we suggest that in placing the coronary sinus mapping electrode, the right anterior oblique 30° projection position should be first adopted because it can allow the electrode to be easily placed and reduce the X-ray radiation dose as much as possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22415318     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-012-9671-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  7 in total

1.  Dimensions of the triangle of Koch in humans.

Authors:  M A McGuire; D C Johnson; M Robotin; D A Richards; J B Uther; D L Ross
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-09-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Sustainability in the cardiac cath lab.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano; Gennaro Santoro; Eliseo Vano
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Reduction of radiation delivered to patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures. Effect of a programme for dose reduction based on radiation-protection training.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Georges; Bernard Livarek; Géraldine Gibault-Genty; Jean-Paul Aziza; Jean-Louis Hautecoeur; Henry Soleille; Hela Messaoudi; Nizar Annabi; Mohammed Al Kebsi
Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.340

4.  Cancer risk from professional exposure in staff working in cardiac catheterization laboratory: insights from the National Research Council's Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII Report.

Authors:  Lucia Venneri; Francesco Rossi; Nicoletta Botto; Maria Grazia Andreassi; Nicoletta Salcone; Ahmed Emad; Mauro Lazzeri; Cesare Gori; Eliseo Vano; Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Acute chromosomal DNA damage in human lymphocytes after radiation exposure in invasive cardiovascular procedures.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Andreassi; Angelo Cioppa; Samantha Manfredi; Cataldo Palmieri; Nicoletta Botto; Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study: part I: overall measures of dose.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Stephen Balter; Patricia E Cole; Hollington T Lu; Beth A Schueler; Michael Geisinger; Alejandro Berenstein; Robin Albert; Jeffrey D Georgia; Patrick T Noonan; John F Cardella; James St George; Eric J Russell; Tim W Malisch; Robert L Vogelzang; George L Miller; Jon Anderson
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Reassessment of radiation risks from electrophysiology procedures compared to coronary angiography.

Authors:  Ian R Smith; John T Rivers; John Hayes; Wayne Stafford; Catrina Codd
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.975

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Effects of two kinds of radio frequency ablations on morphology and function of left atrium in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Gang Lin; Xiang-Jun Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.