BACKGROUND: Exposure of patients to radiation from invasive cardiac procedures is high and may be deleterious. AIMS: To assess the effectiveness of a dose-reduction programme based on radiation-protection training, according to the recommendations of the Euratom Council, the International Commission on Radiological Protection and the French Society of Cardiology. METHODS: In this single-centre survey, dose-area product (DAP, Gy.cm(2)), fluoroscopy time (minutes) and number of runs were evaluated in 3285 consecutive procedures (2077 coronary angiographies [CAs], 1208 percutaneous coronary interventions [PCIs]), performed one year before (2005) and two years after (2006 to 2007) implementation of a programme for radiation dose-reduction. The programme included a 2-day training course in radiological protection for all medical and paramedical staff and recommendations for routine use of low fluoroscopic and acquisition pulse rates (6.25 and 12.5 i/s, respectively), large field size (23cm), maximal collimation and optimal X-ray tube/patient/detector distances. Routine left ventriculography was discouraged. The radial approach was used in>80% of the procedures. RESULTS: Compared with 2005, a significant 50% reduction in DAP was observed in 2006 and 2007 during CA (median [interquartile range] 53 Gy.cm(2) [33-84] vs 26 [16-43] and 21 [14-32], respectively; p<0.0001) and PCI (125 Gy.cm(2) [78-184] vs 49 [31-79] and 44 [27-66], respectively; p<0.0001). Fluoroscopy time and number of runs did not vary significantly in 2006, and decreased slightly in 2007, likely due to an important reduction in rate of left ventriculographies (from 32 to 4%). Inter-operator variability in DAP was reduced. CONCLUSION: Training in radiation protection for interventional cardiologists and use of simple and cost-free dose-reduction techniques were associated with a 50% reduction in radiation exposure to patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures, without any loss of diagnostic information.
BACKGROUND: Exposure of patients to radiation from invasive cardiac procedures is high and may be deleterious. AIMS: To assess the effectiveness of a dose-reduction programme based on radiation-protection training, according to the recommendations of the Euratom Council, the International Commission on Radiological Protection and the French Society of Cardiology. METHODS: In this single-centre survey, dose-area product (DAP, Gy.cm(2)), fluoroscopy time (minutes) and number of runs were evaluated in 3285 consecutive procedures (2077 coronary angiographies [CAs], 1208 percutaneous coronary interventions [PCIs]), performed one year before (2005) and two years after (2006 to 2007) implementation of a programme for radiation dose-reduction. The programme included a 2-day training course in radiological protection for all medical and paramedical staff and recommendations for routine use of low fluoroscopic and acquisition pulse rates (6.25 and 12.5 i/s, respectively), large field size (23cm), maximal collimation and optimal X-ray tube/patient/detector distances. Routine left ventriculography was discouraged. The radial approach was used in>80% of the procedures. RESULTS: Compared with 2005, a significant 50% reduction in DAP was observed in 2006 and 2007 during CA (median [interquartile range] 53 Gy.cm(2) [33-84] vs 26 [16-43] and 21 [14-32], respectively; p<0.0001) and PCI (125 Gy.cm(2) [78-184] vs 49 [31-79] and 44 [27-66], respectively; p<0.0001). Fluoroscopy time and number of runs did not vary significantly in 2006, and decreased slightly in 2007, likely due to an important reduction in rate of left ventriculographies (from 32 to 4%). Inter-operator variability in DAP was reduced. CONCLUSION: Training in radiation protection for interventional cardiologists and use of simple and cost-free dose-reduction techniques were associated with a 50% reduction in radiation exposure to patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures, without any loss of diagnostic information.