Literature DB >> 19081407

Cancer risk from professional exposure in staff working in cardiac catheterization laboratory: insights from the National Research Council's Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII Report.

Lucia Venneri1, Francesco Rossi, Nicoletta Botto, Maria Grazia Andreassi, Nicoletta Salcone, Ahmed Emad, Mauro Lazzeri, Cesare Gori, Eliseo Vano, Eugenio Picano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Occupational doses from fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures are the highest ones registered among medical staff using x-rays. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the order of magnitude of cancer risk caused by professional radiation exposure in modern invasive cardiology practice.
METHODS: From the dosimetric Tuscany Health Physics data bank of 2006, we selected dosimetric data of the 26 (7 women, 19 men; age 46 +/- 9 years) workers of the cardiovascular catheterization laboratory with effective dose >2 mSv. Effective dose (E) was expressed in milliSievert, calculated from personal dose equivalent registered by the thermoluminescent dosimeter, at waist or chest, under the apron, according to the recommendations of National Council of Radiation Protection. Lifetime attributable risk of cancer was estimated using the approach of Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation 2006 report VII.
RESULTS: Cardiac catheterization laboratory staff represented 67% of the 6 workers with yearly exposure >6 mSv. Of the 26 workers with 2006 exposure >2 mSv, 15 of them had complete records of at least 10 (up to 25) consecutive years. For these 15 subjects having a more complete lifetime dosimetric history, the median individual effective dose was 46 mSv (interquartile range = 24-64). The median risk of (fatal and nonfatal) cancer (Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation 2006) was 1 in 192 (interquartile range = 1 in 137-1 in 370).
CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative professional radiological exposure is associated with a non-negligible Lifetime attributable risk of cancer for the most exposed contemporary cardiac catheterization laboratory staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19081407     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  63 in total

1.  DNA double-strand breaks as potential indicators for the biological effects of ionising radiation exposure from cardiac CT and conventional coronary angiography: a randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Dominik Geisel; Elke Zimmermann; Matthias Rief; Johannes Greupner; Michael Laule; Fabian Knebel; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Relation between projection positions and X-ray radiation doses during placement of the coronary sinus mapping electrode.

Authors:  Gang Lin; Jian-Fei Huang; Hui-He Lu; Lin-Sheng Shi; Jue Wang; Shu-Qing Zhang
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Comparison of air kerma between C-arm CT and 64-multidetector-row CT using a phantom.

Authors:  Seiki Hosokawa; Nobuyuki Kawai; Morio Sato; Hiroki Minamiguchi; Motoki Nakai; Kazuhiro Murotani; Tadayoshi Nishioku; Shintaro Shirai; Tetsuo Sonomura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Academic training in radiation safety awareness and practice among Iranian residents/fellows.

Authors:  Morteza Safi; Hossein Aerab-Sheibani; Mohammad Hassan Namazi; Hossein Vakili; Habibollah Saadat
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2014-09-09

5.  The Efficacy of Shielding Systems for Reducing Operator Exposure during Neurointerventional Procedures: A Real-World Prospective Study.

Authors:  T R Miller; J Zhuo; G Jindal; R Shivashankar; N Beaty; D Gandhi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Noise reduction technology reduces radiation dose in chronic total occlusions percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Davide Maccagni; Susanna Benincasa; Barbara Bellini; Luciano Candilio; Enrico Poletti; Mauro Carlino; Antonio Colombo; Lorenzo Azzalini
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Changing Patterns in the Performance of Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures and Adherence to Radiation Safety Practices in a U.S. Cohort of Radiologic Technologists.

Authors:  Hyeyeun Lim; Martha S Linet; Miriam E Van Dyke; Donald L Miller; Steven L Simon; Alice J Sigurdson; Cari M Kitahara
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Embryonic development and skeletogenic gene expression affected by X-rays in the Mediterranean sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus.

Authors:  Valeria Matranga; Francesca Zito; Caterina Costa; Rosa Bonaventura; Salvatore Giarrusso; Filippo Celi
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Reduction of radiation exposure in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Lesson learned.

Authors:  Roberto De Ponti
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-26

Review 10.  Health risk and biological effects of cardiac ionising imaging: from epidemiology to genes.

Authors:  Ilenia Foffa; Monica Cresci; Maria Grazia Andreassi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.