| Literature DB >> 22403734 |
Lu Ke1, Zhi-hui Tong, Hai-bin Ni, Wei-wei Ding, Jia-kui Sun, Wei-qin Li, Ning Li, Jie-shou Li.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) and intra abdominal hypertension(IAH) are common clinical findings in patients with severe acute pancreatitis(SAP). It is thought that an increased intra abdominal pressure(IAP) is associated with poor prognosis in SAP patients. But the detailed effect of IAH/ACS on different organ system is not clear. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of SAP combined with IAH on hemodynamics, systemic oxygenation, and organ damage in a 12 h lasting porcine model. MEASUREMENTS AND METHODS: Following baseline registrations, a total of 30 animals were divided into 5 groups (6 animals in each group): SAP+IAP30 group, SAP+IAP20 group, SAP group, IAP30 group(sham-operated but without SAP) and sham-operated group. We used a N(2) pneumoperitoneum to induce different levels of IAH and retrograde intra-ductal infusion of sodium taurocholate to induce SAP. The investigation period was 12 h. Hemodynamic parameters (CO, HR, MAP, CVP), urine output, oxygenation parameters(e.g., S(v)O(2), PO(2), PaCO(2)), peak inspiratory pressure, as well as serum parameters (e.g., ALT, amylase, lactate, creatinine) were recorded. Histological examination of liver, intestine, pancreas, and lung was performed. MAINEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22403734 PMCID: PMC3293917 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Histopathological scoring criteria of lung.
| Score | Hyaline membranes | Microthrombi | Edema | Interstitial infiltration | Atelectasis | Hemorrhage |
| 0 | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent |
| 1 | Discrete | Few in small vessels | Discrete | Discrete | Small foci | Small foci |
| 2 | Moderate | Some | Moderate | Moderate | Larger foci | Larger foci |
| 3 | Severe | Many larger vessels | Severe | Severe | Diffuse | Diffuse |
Histological Scoring for Acute Pancreatitis.
| Condition | Score | Description |
| Edema | 0 | Absent |
| 1 | Diffuse expansion of interlobar septa | |
| 2 | 1+ diffuse expansion of interlobular septa | |
| 3 | 2+ diffuse expansion of interacinar septa | |
| 4 | 3+ diffuse expansion of intercellular septa | |
| Inflammation | 0 | Absent |
| 1 | Around ductal margin | |
| 2 | In parenchyma (.50% of lobules) | |
| 3 | In parenchyma (51%–75% of lobules) | |
| 4 | In parenchyma (.75% of lobules) | |
| Vacuolization | 0 | Absent |
| 1 | Periductal (.5%) | |
| 2 | Focal (5%–20%) | |
| 3 | Diffuse (21%–50%) | |
| 4 | Severe (.50%) | |
| Necrosis | 0 | Absent |
| 1 | 1–4 necrotic cells/HPF | |
| 2 | 5–10 necrotic cells/HPF | |
| 3 | 11–15 necrotic cells/HPF | |
| 4 | .16 necrotic cells/HPF |
Histological criteria for the assessment of liver damage.
| Score | Congestion | Vacuolization | Necrosis |
| 0 | None | None | None |
| 1 | Minimal | Minimal | Single cell necrosis |
| 2 | Mild | Mild | −30% |
| 3 | Moderate | Moderate | −60% |
| 4 | Severe | Severe | >60% |
Figure 1Urine output of SAP+IAH, SAP, IAH and sham groups during the experiment period (▵Significant difference vs. SAP+IAP20 group; *Significant difference vs. sham group; # significant difference vs. IAP30 group; +significant difference vs.SAP group; ∧significant difference vs. baseline values).
Figure 2Hemodynamic responses of SAP+IAH, SAP, IAH and sham groups during the experiment period (*Significant difference vs. sham group; # significant difference vs. IAP30 group; +significant difference vs.SAP group; ∧ significant difference vs. baseline values).
SV, SVR, APP and PIP during the experimental period.
| Parameter | Group | 0 h | 3 h | 6 h | 9 h | 12 h |
| SV(ml) | SAP+IAP30 | 45.5±4.4 | 21.7±3.0 | 15.8±4.5 | 13.0±1.4 | 11.8±1.6 |
| SAP+IAP20 | 48.1±4.3 | 21.7±5.2 | 15.9±2.9 | 13.1±1.0 | 12.8±1.5 | |
| SAP | 45.0±7.1 | 29.3±3.1 | 21.0±3.3 | 18.2±3.3 | 20.0±4.8 | |
| IAP30 | 49.0±5.5 | 30.7±3.2 | 30.2±1.9 | 31.0±3.3 | 40.5±5.3 | |
| Sham | 49.2±6.7 | 39.5±4.2 | 40.2±5 | 40.5±5.3 | 39.5±4.4 | |
| SVR(dyne/s/cm5) | SAP+IAP30 | 1359±104 | 2077±270 | 2443±432 | 2339±319 | 2486±201 |
| SAP+IAP20 | 1430±191 | 2063±394 | 2286±549 | 2226±459 | 2113±462 | |
| SAP | 1497±228 | 1908±495 | 2618±727 | 2684±648 | 2397±576 | |
| IAP30 | 1345±89 | 1725±191 | 1744±155 | 1980±249 | 1974±206 | |
| Sham | 1340±149 | 1386±134 | 1364±141 | 1406±143 | 1396±143 | |
| APP(mmHg) | SAP+IAP30 | 83.7±6.9 | 72.7±7.3 | 62.3±8.0 | 46.5±11.5 | 45.3±3.5 |
| SAP+IAP20 | 88.2±8.9 | 75.0±8.0 | 67.5±7.5 | 57.0±8.4 | 50.5±7.5 | |
| SAP | 90.5±9.9 | 85.2±14.1 | 93.5±16.1 | 89.8±9.7 | 89.5±9.2 | |
| IAP30 | 94.5±8.5 | 64.8±6.2 | 65.8±4.8 | 72±9.2 | 73.5±6.5 | |
| Sham | 91.3±13.4 | 91.3±6.1 | 93.0±9.1 | 93.0±7.3 | 91.5±7.9 | |
| PIP(cmH2O) | SAP+IAP30 | 17.8±2.3 | 50.0±3.0 | 50.0±2.8 | 49.2±2.4 | 50.0±1.0 |
| SAP+IAP20 | 17.3±2.8 | 40.5±1.6 | 39.3±1.8 | 38.4±2.5 | 37.6±1.0 | |
| SAP | 17.0±2.5 | 16.8±0.8 | 16.7±1.6 | 18.3±1.6 | 22.8±2.4 | |
| IAP30 | 18.3±2.7 | 47.3±3.4 | 45.3±4.3 | 47.2±3.7 | 45.5±3.4 | |
| Sham | 18.2±2.6 | 19.2±1.0 | 19.0±2.8 | 19.5±2.2 | 19.8±2.7 |
SV: stroke volume; SVR: systemic vascular resistance; APP: abdominal perfusion pressure; PIP: peak inspiratory pressure; SAP: severe acute pancreatitis; IAP: intra abdominal pressure;
Significant difference vs. SAP+IAP20 group;
Significant difference vs. sham group;
significant difference vs. IAP30 group;
significant difference vs. SAP group;
significant difference vs. baseline values.
Oxygenation-derived parameters during the experimental period.
| Parameter | Group | 0 h | 3 h | 6 h | 9 h | 12 h |
| Lactate(mmol/L) | SAP+IAP30 | 0.95±0.16 | 1.97±0.28 | 2.87±0.79 | 3.60±0.80 | 3.80±0.94 |
| SAP+IAP20 | 0.80±0.24 | 1.77±0.45 | 2.63±0.66 | 3.48±0.57 | 3.92±0.81 | |
| SAP | 0.90±0.14 | 1.38±0.31 | 1.95±0.42 | 2.05±0.24 | 2.08±0.31 | |
| IAP30 | 1.03±0.33 | 1.68±0.33 | 2.05±0.28 | 2.30±0.38 | 2.58±0.48 | |
| Sham | 0.90±0.17 | 1.28±0.33 | 1.27±0.22 | 1.18±0.33 | 1.05±0.21 | |
| SVO2(%) | SAP+IAP30 | 71.0±2.9 | 51.1±2.2 | 42.0±5.7 | 40.5±5.6 | 40.2±5.9 |
| SAP+IAP20 | 76.2±3.7 | 58.9±3.8 | 48.5±7.2 | 42.3±2.9 | 40.5±3.8 | |
| SAP | 71.4±3.5 | 64.6±8.2 | 60.8±8.1 | 52.9±5.1 | 53.6±5.5 | |
| IAP30 | 73.1±5.0 | 65.8±7.9 | 64.9±7.4 | 60.5±6.6 | 61.0±9.9 | |
| Sham | 71.6±4.3 | 69.8±3.5 | 71.1±5.1 | 71.2±4.4 | 72.0±2.5 | |
| PO2(mmHg) | SAP+IAP30 | 86.0±6.1 | 77.9±5.8 | 72.9±4.4 | 74.6±2.6 | 75.4±2.5 |
| SAP+IAP20 | 91.7±9.0 | 82.5±4.8 | 74.6±5.4 | 70.4±2.8 | 74.1±5.3 | |
| SAP | 91.5±11.9 | 89.8±14.2 | 87.9±11.0 | 86.1±9.7 | 83.7±10.6 | |
| IAP30 | 91.0±4.1 | 89.8±7.0 | 84.0±7.7 | 83.3±5.4 | 81.2±2.9 | |
| Sham | 88.3±4.1 | 88.4±4.3 | 89.2±6.5 | 88.5±5.7 | 88.5±5.1 | |
| Base excess | SAP+IAP30 | 4.0±1.8 | 0.4±2.3 | −0.7±1.4 | −1.8±2.0 | −1.6±1.6 |
| SAP+IAP20 | 4.0±1.0 | 1.1±0.9 | 0.0±0.9 | −1.1±1.2 | −1.6±1.6 | |
| SAP | 4.5±1.2 | 3.6±1.3 | 4.2±1.3 | 3.3±1.1 | 2.9±1.2 | |
| IAP30 | 3.4±1.1 | 4.0±0.9 | 3.8±1.3 | 2.6±1.2 | 2.4±1.4 | |
| Sham | 4.3±1.1 | 4.1±1.4 | 4.6±1.4 | 4.6±1.3 | 4.5±1.2 |
SAP: severe acute pancreatitis; IAP: intra abdominal pressure; SVO2: mixed venous oxygen saturation; PO2: partial pressure of oxygen;
Significant difference vs. sham group;
significant difference vs. IAP30 group;
significant difference vs.SAP group;
significant difference vs. baseline values.
Biochemical parameters during the experiment period.
| Parameter | Group | 0 h | 3 h | 6 h | 9 h | 12 h |
| Amylase(U/L) | SAP+IAP30 | 595±153 | 2877±841 | 4665±901 | 5773±1107 | 6766±1945 |
| SAP+IAP20 | 680±160 | 2923±680 | 4690±847 | 5472±1141 | 6455±2099 | |
| SAP | 709±153 | 2629±859 | 3882±1525 | 4428±1334 | 5195±1019 | |
| IAP30 | 748±139 | 1400±373 | 1788±198 | 1953±194 | 2087±107 | |
| Sham | 680±144 | 1194±265 | 1392±344 | 1493±255 | 1488±194 | |
| AST(U/L) | SAP+IAP30 | 77±10 | 164±26 | 213±28 | 262±44 | 279±34 |
| SAP+IAP20 | 57±12 | 153±27 | 190±30 | 233±48 | 279±46 | |
| SAP | 86±15 | 119±22 | 145±25 | 160±24 | 168±29 | |
| IAP30 | 80±19 | 99±14 | 141±18 | 163±18 | 191±12 | |
| Sham | 80±17 | 86±20 | 91±19 | 94±12 | 97±8 | |
| SUN(mmol/L) | SAP+IAP30 | 3.15±0.99 | 5.82±1.60 | 8.53±1.34 | 10.68±2.02 | 10.92±1.25 |
| SAP+IAP20 | 2.57±0.48 | 4.48±1.09 | 7.70±1.48 | 9.72±2.07 | 10.77±2.50 | |
| SAP | 3.35±0.54 | 4.12±0.99 | 5.18±1.47 | 5.88±1.68 | 7.12±1.54 | |
| IAP30 | 3.26±0.62 | 3.52±0.53 | 3.78±0.43 | 4.28±0.44 | 4.70±0.75 | |
| Sham | 3.33±0.73 | 3.80±0.64 | 4.08±0.52 | 3.88±0.67 | 4.10±0.85 | |
| Creatinine(µmol/L) | SAP+IAP30 | 74±24 | 151±22 | 225±37 | 287±25 | 314±29 |
| SAP+IAP20 | 72±12 | 148±25 | 197±30 | 241±33 | 313±36 | |
| SAP | 76±18 | 131±33 | 177±35 | 205±28 | 226±243 | |
| IAP30 | 67±11 | 92±11 | 106±10 | 149±23 | 181±30 | |
| Sham | 77±18 | 90±18 | 96±20 | 99±15 | 105±15 |
SAP: severe acute pancreatitis; IAP: intra abdominal pressure; AST: Aspartate transaminase; SUN: serum urea nitrogen;
Significant difference vs. sham group;
significant difference vs. IAP30 group;
significant difference vs.SAP group;
significant difference vs. baseline values.
Figure 3The comparisons of histopathology scores among five experimental groups (*Significant difference vs. sham group; # significant difference vs. IAP30 group; +significant difference vs.SAP group).
Figure 4Histomorphological images of pancreas (A–C), liver (D–G),lung(H–K) and ileum (L–O) of SAP+IAH animals (A,D,H,L),SAP animals(E,I,M), IAP 30 mmHg animals(B,F,J,N) and sham-operated animals(C,G,K,O).
Remnant necrotic tissue with a great number of inflammatory cells infiltration(A×200).Mild-to-moderate-grade edema and degenerative changes with very mild necrosis(B×200). Mild edema and inflammation without evidence of necrosis(C×200). Livers of the study groups (D×400) showed more severe congestion and necrosis when compared with the SAP group(E×200),while there were mild-to-moderate-grade congestion, vacuolization and leukocyte infiltration in IAP 30 mmHg group(F×200). Only minor changes could be observed in the sham controls (G, 400×). The lung of the SAP+IAH animals displayed interstitial infiltration, focal hemorrhage and atelectasis(H×200) while the specimen of SAP animal presented lower grade injury(I×200). The lung specimen of IAH alone animals displayed atelectasis as well, but only moderate hemorrhage and interstitial infiltration(J×200). Slight edema and infiltration were seen in sham animals(K×400). The small bowel specimen of the study group (L×200) displayed denuded villi. The specimen of SAP animals presented extended subepithelial space and lymph follicle hyperplasia(M×200), while in the IAH group, there was similar histological changes to the SAP group and also lymph follicle hyperplasia(N×200). In the sham control, only minor changes could be seen(O×200).