Literature DB >> 18520642

Incidence and clinical effects of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients.

Maria Gabriela Vidal1, Javier Ruiz Weisser, Francisco Gonzalez, Maria America Toro, Cecilia Loudet, Carina Balasini, Hector Canales, Rosa Reina, Elisa Estenssoro.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the epidemiology and outcomes of intra-abdominal hypertension in a heterogeneous intensive care unit population.
DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study.
SETTING: This study was conducted at a medical-surgical intensive care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Study patients included all those consecutively admitted during 9 months, staying > 24 hrs, and requiring bladder catheterization.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: On admission, epidemiologic data and risk factors for intra-abdominal hypertension were studied; then, daily maximal and mean intra-abdominal pressures (IAP(max) and IAP(mean)), abdominal perfusion pressure, fluid balances, filtration gradient, and sequential organ failure assessment score, were registered. IAPs were recorded through a bladder catheter every 6 hrs until death, discharge, or along 7 days. Intra-abdominal hypertension was defined as IAP > or = 12 mm Hg. Abdominal compartment syndrome was defined as IAP > or = 20 mm Hg plus > or = 1 new organ failure. Main outcome measure was hospital mortality. Of 83 patients, considering IAP(max), 31% had intra-abdominal hypertension on admission and another 33% developed it after (23% and 31% with IAP(mean)). Main risk factors were mechanical ventilation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and fluid resuscitation (relative risk, 5.26, 3.19, and 2.50, respectively). Patients with intra-abdominal hypertension were sicker, had higher mortality (53% vs. 27%, p = .02), and consistently showed higher total and renal sequential organ failure assessment score, daily and cumulative fluid balances, and lower filtration gradient. Nonsurvivors had higher IAP(max), IAP(mean), and fluid balances and lower abdominal perfusion pressure. Abdominal compartment syndrome developed in 12%; 20% survived. Logistic regression identified IAP(max) as an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.30; p = .003) after adjusting with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and comorbidities (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.25; p = .001; and odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-5.67; p = .013, respectively). Models with IAP(mean) and abdominal perfusion pressure also performed well. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves were .81 and .83.
CONCLUSIONS: Intra-abdominal hypertension, diagnosed either with IAP(max) or IAP(mean), was frequent and showed an independent association with mortality. Intra-abdominal hypertension was significantly associated with more severe organ failures, particularly renal and respiratory, and a prolonged intensive care unit stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18520642     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817c7a4d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  70 in total

1.  Expert consensus on the perioperative management of patients with sepsis.

Authors:  Jun-Ping Chen; Xiang-Ming Fang; Xiao-Ju Jin; Rong-Tian Kang; Ke-Xuan Liu; Jin-Bao Li; Yan Luo; Zhi-Jie Lu; Chang-Hong Miao; Han-Xiang Ma; Wei Mei; Yang-Wen Ou; Si-Hua Qi; Zai-Sheng Qin; Guo-Gang Tian; An-Shi Wu; Dong-Xin Wang; Tian Yu; Yong-Hao Yu; Jing Zhao; Ming-Zhang Zuo; Shi-Hai Zhang
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2015

2.  AIDS is coming to your ICU: be prepared for acute bowel injury and acute intestinal distress syndrome...

Authors:  Manu L N G Malbrain; Inneke De Laet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  [Volume replacement in intensive care medicine].

Authors:  B Nohé; A Ploppa; V Schmidt; K Unertl
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  Fluid balance and acute kidney injury.

Authors:  John R Prowle; Jorge E Echeverri; E Valentina Ligabo; Claudio Ronco; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 28.314

5.  Abdominal compartment syndrome: the importance of urinary catheter placement in measuring intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  Muzzammil Ali
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-10-21

6.  Lessons from Trauma Care: Abdominal Compartment Syndrome and Damage Control Laparotomy in the Patient with Gastrointestinal Disease.

Authors:  Aaron Richman; Clay Cothren Burlew
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome.

Authors:  Gerald L Early; Julie Wesp; Stanley M Augustin
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct

8.  Research in Latin America: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Elisa Estenssoro; Gilberto Friedman; Glenn Hernández
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Fluid management for the prevention and attenuation of acute kidney injury.

Authors:  John R Prowle; Christopher J Kirwan; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 28.314

10.  Understanding of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome among Pediatric Healthcare Providers.

Authors:  J Chiaka Ejike; Jennifer Newcombe; Joanne Baerg; Khaled Bahjri; Mudit Mathur
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2010-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.