| Literature DB >> 24244397 |
Wei-Dong Li1, Lin Jia, Ya Ou, Yao-Xing Huang, Shu-Man Jiang.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To monitor intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and intestinal barrier function in a rat model of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) to elucidate a potential relevant therapeutic window.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24244397 PMCID: PMC3828342 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078975
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Data of weight of ascites, mortality, pathological scores of intestine and pancreas for groups at each time point.
| Time point (h) | Group | Weight of ascites (g) | Mortality | Pathological score of intestine | Pathological score of pancreas |
| 0 h | 0.7(0.4) | 0% | 1.5(0.5) | 1.96(0.45) | |
| 3 h | SO | 1.2(0.3) | 0% | 1.7(0.3) | 2.25(0.38) |
| ANP(N = 10) | 4.6(0.8) a | 0% | 3.7(0.05) a | 5.6(0.12) a | |
| 6 h | SO | 1.5(0.7) | 0% | 1.6(0.52) | 1.5(0.2) |
| ANP(N = 8) | 5.8(1.5)ab | 20% | 7.81(1.1)ab | 7.26(0.52) ab | |
| 12 h | SO | 0.8(0.4) | 0% | 2.2(0.3) | 2.56(0.17) |
| ANP(N = 8) | 8.8(1.3)abc | 20% | 11.1(0.8)abc | 11.8(0.39) abc | |
| 24 h | SO | 2.2(0.3) | 0% | 2.2(0.4) | 2.0(0.23) |
| ANP(N = 6) | 10.5(2.6)abc | 40% | 13.8(0.79)abcd | 14.10(0.22) abcd |
In ANP and SO, a P<0.05 vs 0 h;b P<0.05 vs 3 h; c P<0.05 vs 6 h; d P<0.05 vs 12 h.
There were significantly differences between ANP and SO at each time point.
Data for each group at each time point (mean (SEM))
Figure 1Induction of IAP. Described the variation tendency of IAP in two groups.
Data of amylase, Cr (endogenous creatinine), TB (total bilirubin) and TNF-alpha for groups at each time point.
| Time point (h) | Group | Amylase (U/L) | TB (µmol/L) | Cr (µmol/L) | TNF-alpha (pg/ml) |
| 0 h | 305.5(137.2) | 0.2(0.07) | 32.0(5.6) | 6.3(2.7) | |
| 3 h | SO | 357.9(39.5) | 0.91(0.38) | 30.5(6.0) | 13.5(1.4) |
| ANP(N = 10) | 3624.8(1411.3) a | 5.36(1.74) a | 80.2(33.8) a | 80.7(18.3) a | |
| 6 h | SO | 596.2(29.5) | 0.82(0.18) | 35.5(4.9) | 8.9(0.4) |
| ANP(N = 8) | 8930.8(1853.1) ab | 6.36(1.90) ab | 98.2(42.8) ab | 166.2(28.6)ab | |
| 12 h | SO | 587.8 (62.9) | 0.80(0.25) | 29.5(8.2) | 15.6(1.5) |
| ANP(N = 8) | 9767.5(2996.6) abc | 8.02(2.64) abc | 150.2(30.8) abc | 103.2(17.6)abc | |
| 24 h | SO | 342.6(17.8) | 0.91(0.38) | 33.5(7.5) | 11.6(6.9) |
| ANP(N = 6) | 11024.5 (2203.5) abcd | 8.36(3.74) abcd | 204.2(38.8) abcd | 107.3(20.2)abcd |
In ANP and SO, a P<0.05 vs 0 h;b P<0.05 vs 3 h; c P<0.05 vs 6 h; d P<0.05 vs 12 h.
There were significantly differences between ANP and SO at each time point.
Cr: endogenous creatinine, TB: total bilirubin.
ANP 3 h group n = 10, ANP 6 h group n = 8, ANP 12 h group n = 8, ANP 24 h group n = 6.
Data for each group at each time point (mean (SEM))
Figure 2Induction of DAO. Described the variation tendency of DAO in two groups.
Figure 3Induction of D-Lactate. Described the variation tendency of D-Lactate in two groups.