Literature DB >> 11116418

Laparoscopy: searching for the proper insufflation gas.

T Menes1, H Spivak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although many aspects of laparoscopic surgery have been determined, the question of which insufflation gas is the best arises repeatedly. The aim of this study was to review the findings on the major gases used today in order to provide information and guidelines for the laparoscopic surgeon.
METHODS: We reviewed the literature for clinical and laboratory studies on the currently used laparoscopic insufflation gases: carbon dioxide (CO(2)), nitrous oxide (N(2)O), helium (He), air, nitrogen (N(2)), and argon (Ar). The following parameters were evaluated: acid-base changes, hemodynamic and respiratory sequelae, hepatic and renal blood flow changes, increase in intracranial pressure, outcome of venous emboli, and port-site tumor growth.
RESULTS: The major advantage of CO(2) is its rapid dissolution in the event of venous emboli. Hemodynamic and acid-base changes with CO(2) insufflation usually are mild and clinically negligible for most patients. Although N(2)O is advantageous for procedures requiring local/regional anesthesia, it does not suppress combustion. Findings show that Ar may have unwanted hemodynamic effects, especially on hepatic blood flow. There are almost no hemodynamic or acid-base sequelae with the use of He, air, and N(2), but they dissolve slowly and carry a potential risk of lethal venous emboli.
CONCLUSIONS: Clearly, CO(2) maintains its role as the primary insufflation gas in laparoscopy, but N(2)O has a role in some cases of depressed pulmonary function or in local/regional anesthesia cases. Other gases have no significant advantage over CO(2) or N(2)O and should be used only in protocol studies. The relation of port-site metastasis to a specific type of gas requires further research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11116418     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  27 in total

Review 1.  Stress response to laparoscopic surgery: a review.

Authors:  M Buunen; M Gholghesaei; R Veldkamp; D W Meijer; H J Bonjer; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Use of endogenous NADH fluorescence for real-time in situ visualization of epicardial radiofrequency ablation lesions and gaps.

Authors:  Marco Mercader; Luther Swift; Sumit Sood; Huda Asfour; Matthew Kay; Narine Sarvazyan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 3.  [Pathophysiology of capnoperitoneum. Implications for ventilation and hemodynamics].

Authors:  A Vogt; B Eberle
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Feasibility of endoscopic guidance for nonsurgical transthoracic atrial and ventricular epicardial ablation.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Sergey V Kantsevoy; Menekhem M Zviman; Fredrick A Matsen; Hugh Calkins; Ronald D Berger; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 5.  [Anesthesia for laparoscopic interventions].

Authors:  R Hömme
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  Advancing frontiers in anaesthesiology with laparoscopy.

Authors:  Jayashree Sood
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Comparison of impacts of intraperitoneal saline instillation with and without pulmonary recruitment maneuver on post-laparoscopic shoulder pain prevention: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kyoung-Ho Ryu; Sung Hyun Lee; Eun-Ah Cho; Ji-A Kim; Go-Eun Lim; Taejong Song
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Cardiopulmonary effects of using carbon dioxide for laparoscopic surgery in cats.

Authors:  Shannon G Beazley; Kevin Cosford; Tanya Duke-Novakovski
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 9.  [Special features of laparoscopic operations from an anesthesiologic viewpoint: a review].

Authors:  D Meininger; C Byhahn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Effect of intraabdominal pressure elevation and positioning on hemodynamic responses during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective controlled clinical study.

Authors:  I R A M Mertens zur Borg; A Lim; S J C Verbrugge; J N M IJzermans; J Klein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.