Literature DB >> 11591971

Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly.

L M Brunt1, M A Quasebarth, D L Dunnegan, N J Soper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A study was conducted to determine whether extremely elderly patients, age 80 years or older, were at higher risk for adverse outcomes from laparoscopic cholecystectomy than patients younger than 80 years.
METHODS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted in 421 patients age 65 years or older from 1989 through 1999. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (age 65-79 years; n = 351) and group 2 (age, 80-95 years; n = 70). A prospective database was analyzed for mean +/- standard deviation and using Student's t-test and chi-square analysis.
RESULTS: Advanced age (group 2) was associated with a higher mean American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class (2.7 vs 2.3; p < 0.001) and a greater incidence of common bile duct stones (43% vs 26%; p < 0.01), as compared with those of younger age (group 1). Mean operative times in group 2 were 106 +/- 45 min as compared with 96 +/- 38 min in group 1, a difference that is not significant. The extremely elderly (group 2) had a four-fold higher rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy (16% vs 4%) and a longer mean postoperative hospital stay (2.1 vs 1.4 days). Grades 1 and 2 complications also were more common in group 2: grade 1: group 1, 8.8% vs group 2, 17% and grade 2: group 1, 4.3% vs group 2, 7.1% (p < 0.05). One patient in group 1 had a myocardial infarction 13 days postoperatively, and two deaths occurred in the extremely elderly group within 30 days postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly is associated with more complications and a higher rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy than in elderly individuals younger than 80 years. The greater chance of encountering a severely inflamed or scarred gallbladder and common bile duct stones as well as increasing comorbidities likely account for these differences in outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11591971     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  59 in total

1.  Percutaneous drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis.

Authors:  K Kortram; T S de Vries Reilingh; M J Wiezer; B van Ramshorst; D Boerma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion: is the surgeon's selection needed?

Authors:  Sandra C Donkervoort; Lea M Dijksman; Lincey C F de Nes; Pieter G Versluis; Joris Derksen; Michael F Gerhards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Predicting Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Based on Clinicoradiological Assessment.

Authors:  Ravindra Nidoni; Tejaswini V Udachan; Prasad Sasnur; Ramakanth Baloorkar; Vikram Sindgikar; Basavaraj Narasangi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-12-01

5.  Cholecystectomy for the elderly: no hesitation for otherwise healthy patients.

Authors:  Liv Bjerre Juul Nielsen; Kirstine Moll Harboe; Linda Bardram
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in octogenarians: is it worth the risk?

Authors:  R Costi; D DiMauro; A Mazzeo; A S Boselli; S Contini; V Violi; L Roncoroni; L Sarli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES): a safe and definitive management of gallstone pancreatitis with the gallbladder left in situ.

Authors:  Mark Bignell; Matthew Dearing; Andrew Hindmarsh; Michael Rhodes
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Expectant treatment of cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis in patients over 80 years of age.

Authors:  R Costi; L Sarli; V Violi; L Roncoroni
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients aged 80 years and over.

Authors:  A-Hon Kwon; Yoichi Matsui
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome.

Authors:  Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.