PURPOSE: Myocardial late gadolinium enhancement was originally validated using higher than label-recommended doses of gadolinium chelate. The objective of this study was to evaluate available evidence for various gadolinium dosing regimens used for CMR. The relationship of gadolinium dose warnings (due to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis) announced in 2008 to gadolinium dosing regimens was also examined. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of peer reviewed publications from January, 2004 to December, 2010. Major subject search headings (MeSh) terms from the National Library of Medicine's PubMed were: contrast media, gadolinium, heart, magnetic resonance imaging; searches were limited to human studies with abstracts published in English. Case reports, review articles, editorials, MRA related papers and all reports that did not indicate gadolinium type or weight-based dose were excluded. For all included references, full text was available to determine the total administered gadolinium dose on a per kg basis. Average and median dose values were weighted by the number of subjects in each study. RESULTS: 399 publications were identified in PubMed; 233 studies matched the inclusion criteria, encompassing 19,934 patients with mean age 54.2 ± 11.4 (range 9.3 to 76 years). 34 trials were related to perfusion testing and 199 to myocardial late gadolinium enhancement. In 2004, the weighted-median and weighted-mean contrast dose were 0.15 and 0.16 ± 0.06 mmol/kg, respectively. Median contrast doses for 2005-2010 were: 0.2 mmol/kg for all years, respectively. Mean contrast doses for the years 2005-2010 were: 0.19 ± 0.03, 0.18 ± 0.04, 0.18 ± 0.10, 0.18 ± 0.03, 0.18 ± 0.04 and 0.18 ± 0.04 mmol/kg, respectively (p for trend, NS). Gadopentetate dimeglumine was the most frequent gadolinium type [114 (48.9%) studies]. No change in mean gadolinium dose was present before, versus after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) black box warning (p > 0.05). Three multi-center dose ranging trials have been published for cardiac MRI applications. CONCLUSION: CMR studies in the peer-reviewed published literature routinely use higher gadolinium doses than regulatory agencies indicated in the package leaflet. Clinical trials should be supported to determine the appropriate doses of gadolinium for CMR studies.
PURPOSE: Myocardial late gadolinium enhancement was originally validated using higher than label-recommended doses of gadolinium chelate. The objective of this study was to evaluate available evidence for various gadolinium dosing regimens used for CMR. The relationship of gadolinium dose warnings (due to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis) announced in 2008 to gadolinium dosing regimens was also examined. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of peer reviewed publications from January, 2004 to December, 2010. Major subject search headings (MeSh) terms from the National Library of Medicine's PubMed were: contrast media, gadolinium, heart, magnetic resonance imaging; searches were limited to human studies with abstracts published in English. Case reports, review articles, editorials, MRA related papers and all reports that did not indicate gadolinium type or weight-based dose were excluded. For all included references, full text was available to determine the total administered gadolinium dose on a per kg basis. Average and median dose values were weighted by the number of subjects in each study. RESULTS: 399 publications were identified in PubMed; 233 studies matched the inclusion criteria, encompassing 19,934 patients with mean age 54.2 ± 11.4 (range 9.3 to 76 years). 34 trials were related to perfusion testing and 199 to myocardial late gadolinium enhancement. In 2004, the weighted-median and weighted-mean contrast dose were 0.15 and 0.16 ± 0.06 mmol/kg, respectively. Median contrast doses for 2005-2010 were: 0.2 mmol/kg for all years, respectively. Mean contrast doses for the years 2005-2010 were: 0.19 ± 0.03, 0.18 ± 0.04, 0.18 ± 0.10, 0.18 ± 0.03, 0.18 ± 0.04 and 0.18 ± 0.04 mmol/kg, respectively (p for trend, NS). Gadopentetate dimeglumine was the most frequent gadolinium type [114 (48.9%) studies]. No change in mean gadolinium dose was present before, versus after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) black box warning (p > 0.05). Three multi-center dose ranging trials have been published for cardiac MRI applications. CONCLUSION: CMR studies in the peer-reviewed published literature routinely use higher gadolinium doses than regulatory agencies indicated in the package leaflet. Clinical trials should be supported to determine the appropriate doses of gadolinium for CMR studies.
Authors: Ravi G Assomull; Sanjay K Prasad; Jonathan Lyne; Gillian Smith; Elizabeth D Burman; Mohammed Khan; Mary N Sheppard; Philip A Poole-Wilson; Dudley J Pennell Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-10-31 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R J Kim; D S Fieno; T B Parrish; K Harris; E L Chen; O Simonetti; J Bundy; J P Finn; F J Klocke; R M Judd Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-11-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: R J Kim; E Wu; A Rafael; E L Chen; M A Parker; O Simonetti; F J Klocke; R O Bonow; R M Judd Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-11-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J Schwitter; D Nanz; S Kneifel; K Bertschinger; M Büchi; P R Knüsel; B Marincek; T F Lüscher; G K von Schulthess Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-05-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: T H Giang; D Nanz; R Coulden; M Friedrich; M Graves; N Al-Saadi; T F Lüscher; G K von Schulthess; J Schwitter Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: S D Wolff; J Schwitter; R Coulden; M G Friedrich; D A Bluemke; R W Biederman; E T Martin; A J Lansky; F Kashanian; T K F Foo; P E Licato; C R Comeau Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-08-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Diane E Bild; David A Bluemke; Gregory L Burke; Robert Detrano; Ana V Diez Roux; Aaron R Folsom; Philip Greenland; David R Jacob; Richard Kronmal; Kiang Liu; Jennifer Clark Nelson; Daniel O'Leary; Mohammed F Saad; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; Russell P Tracy Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Stewart Russell; Ryan Casey; Dung M Hoang; Benjamin W Little; Peter D Olmsted; David S Rumschitzki; Youssef Zaim Wadghiri; Edward A Fisher Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Ana Luiza Mansur Souto; Rafael Mansur Souto; Isabella Cristina Resende Teixeira; Marcelo Souto Nacif Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Jordy K van Zandwijk; Frank F J Simonis; Friso G Heslinga; Elfi I S Hofmeijer; Robert H Geelkerken; Bennie Ten Haken Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-08-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: A Traboulsee; J H Simon; L Stone; E Fisher; D E Jones; A Malhotra; S D Newsome; J Oh; D S Reich; N Richert; K Rammohan; O Khan; E-W Radue; C Ford; J Halper; D Li Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-11-12 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ashkan A Malayeri; Kristina M Brooks; L Henry Bryant; Robert Evers; Parag Kumar; Daniel S Reich; David A Bluemke Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2016-01-23 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Kimberley G Jacobs; Frandics P Chan; Joseph Y Cheng; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Shiraz A Maskatia Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 2.357