Literature DB >> 25086702

Late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of myocardial infarction: comparison of image quality between single and double doses of contrast agents.

Yeo Koon Kim1, Eun-Ah Park, Whal Lee, Sang Yoon Kim, Jin Wook Chung.   

Abstract

To compare the image quality of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) using a single dose of gadolinium contrast agent versus the conventional double dose for assessing myocardial infarction. This retrospective study examined 37 patients with chronic myocardial infarction who underwent LGE CMR using both inversion recovery (IR)-turbo fast low-angle shot magnitude-reconstructed and phase-sensitive images with two different dosages of gadolinium contrast agent: a single dose of 0.1 mmol/kg gadolinium-DTPA in 17 patients and a double dose of 0.2 mmol/kg in 20 patients. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and visual conspicuity between infarct and normal myocardium (CNRinfarct-normal, conspicuityinfarct-normal) and between infarct and left ventricular cavity (CNRinfarct-LVC, conspicuityinfarct-LVC) were compared. Interobserver agreement for the maximal transmural extent of infarction was also evaluated. CNRinfarct-normal was significantly higher with double-dose gadolinium contrast agent (15.5 ± 20.7 vs. 40.4 ± 16.1 in magnitude images and 9.5 ± 2.8 vs. 11.2 ± 2.7 in phase-sensitive images, P < 0.001) while conspicuityinfarct-normal showed no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Both CNRinfarct-LVC (7.7 ± 10.7 vs. -6.6 ± 19.0 in magnitude images and 4.1 ± 2.3 vs. -0.4 ± 4.1 in phase-sensitive images, P < 0.05) and conspicuityinfarct-LVC were significantly better with single-dose gadolinium contrast. Interobserver agreement for assessing the transmural extent of infarction was moderate in both groups: 0.591 for single-dose and 0.472 for double-dose. LGE CMR using a single dose of gadolinium contrast agent showed significantly better contrast between infarcted myocardium and left ventricular cavity lumen without a significant decrease in visual contrast between infarcted myocardium and normal myocardium, compared to a double dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086702     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0505-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  27 in total

1.  Early assessment of myocardial salvage by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  H B Hillenbrand; R J Kim; M A Parker; D S Fieno; R M Judd
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-10-03       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007.

Authors:  Emanuel Kanal; A James Barkovich; Charlotte Bell; James P Borgstede; William G Bradley; Jerry W Froelich; Tobias Gilk; J Rod Gimbel; John Gosbee; Ellisa Kuhni-Kaminski; James W Lester; John Nyenhuis; Yoav Parag; Daniel J Schaefer; Elizabeth A Sebek-Scoumis; Jeffrey Weinreb; Loren A Zaremba; Pamela Wilcox; Leonard Lucey; Nancy Sass
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  O P Simonetti; R J Kim; D S Fieno; H B Hillenbrand; E Wu; J M Bundy; J P Finn; R M Judd
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Gadobutrol for magnetic resonance imaging of chronic myocardial infarction: intraindividual comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Authors:  Tahir Durmus; Rene Schilling; Patrick Doeblin; Alexander Huppertz; Bernd Hamm; Matthias Taupitz; Moritz Wagner
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function.

Authors:  R J Kim; D S Fieno; T B Parrish; K Harris; E L Chen; O Simonetti; J Bundy; J P Finn; F J Klocke; R M Judd
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium-delayed hyperenhancement.

Authors:  Peter Kellman; Andrew E Arai; Elliot R McVeigh; Anthony H Aletras
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Effects of time, dose, and inversion time for acute myocardial infarct size measurements based on magnetic resonance imaging-delayed contrast enhancement.

Authors:  Anja Wagner; Heiko Mahrholdt; Louise Thomson; Stefan Hager; Gabriel Meinhardt; Wolfgang Rehwald; Michele Parker; Dipan Shah; Udo Sechtem; Raymond J Kim; Robert M Judd
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Assessment of myocardial viability in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. Rest-4-hour-24-hour 201Tl tomography versus dobutamine echocardiography.

Authors:  P Perrone-Filardi; L Pace; M Prastaro; F Squame; S Betocchi; A Soricelli; F Piscione; C Indolfi; T Crisci; M Salvatore; M Chiariello
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after gadopentetate dimeglumine exposure: case series of 36 patients.

Authors:  Hani H Abujudeh; Rathachai Kaewlai; Anna Kagan; Lori B Chibnik; Rosalynn M Nazarian; Whitney A High; Jonathan Kay
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Reversibility of cardiac wall-motion abnormalities predicted by positron tomography.

Authors:  J Tillisch; R Brunken; R Marshall; M Schwaiger; M Mandelkern; M Phelps; H Schelbert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2014 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Automatic high-resolution infarct detection using volumetric multiphase dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Veit Sandfort; Alan C Kwan; Comfort Elumogo; Davis M Vigneault; Rolf Symons; Amir Pourmorteza; Kelly Rice; Cynthia Davies-Venn; Mark A Ahlman; Chia-Ying Liu; Stefan L Zimmerman; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2017-04-18

3.  Combined blood pool and extracellular contrast agents for pediatric and young adult cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Joyce T Johnson; Joshua D Robinson; Jie Deng; Cynthia K Rigsby
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30

4.  Prospective comparison of novel dark blood late gadolinium enhancement with conventional bright blood imaging for the detection of scar.

Authors:  Rohin Francis; Peter Kellman; Tushar Kotecha; Andrea Baggiano; Karl Norrington; Ana Martinez-Naharro; Sabrina Nordin; Daniel S Knight; Roby D Rakhit; Tim Lockie; Philip N Hawkins; James C Moon; Derek J Hausenloy; Hui Xue; Michael S Hansen; Marianna Fontana
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 5.364

5.  Single-Dose Gadoterate Meglumine for 3T Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI for the Assessment of Chronic Myocardial Infarction: Intra-Individual Comparison with Conventional Double-Dose 1.5T MRI.

Authors:  Jiyeon Lim; Eun-Ah Park; Yong Sub Song; Whal Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 6.  Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging in Formerly Preeclamptic Women for Early Detection of Subclinical Myocardial Abnormalities: A 2022 Update.

Authors:  Yentl Brandt; Chahinda Ghossein-Doha; Suzanne C Gerretsen; Marc E A Spaanderman; M Eline Kooi
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-03-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.