Literature DB >> 22374279

Strict X-ray beam collimation for facial bones examination can increase lens exposure.

R Powys1, J Robinson, P L Kench, J Ryan, P C Brennan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: It is well accepted that collimation is a cost-effective dose-reducing tool for X-ray examinations. This phantom-based study investigated the impact of X-ray beam collimation on radiation dose to the lenses of the eyes and thyroid along with the effect on image quality in facial bone radiography.
METHODS: A three-view series (occipitomental, occipitomental 30 and lateral) was investigated, and radiation doses to the lenses and thyroid were measured using an Unfors dosemeter. Images were assessed by six experienced observers using a visual grading analysis and a total of 5400 observations were made.
RESULTS: Strict collimation significantly (p<0.0001) reduced the radiation dose to the lenses of the eyes and thyroid when using a fixed projection-specific exposure. With a variable exposure technique (fixed exit dose, to simulate the behaviour of an automatic exposure control), while strict collimation was again shown to reduce thyroid dose, higher lens doses were demonstrated when compared with larger fields of exposure. Image quality was found to significantly improve using strict collimation, with observer preference being demonstrated using visual grading characteristic curves.
CONCLUSION: The complexities of optimising radiographic techniques have been shown and the data presented emphasise the importance of examining dose-reducing strategies in a comprehensive way.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22374279      PMCID: PMC3587082          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/19989149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  9 in total

1.  The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Typical patient radiation doses in diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  R A Parry; S A Glaze; B R Archer
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Monitoring the eye lens: which dose quantity is adequate?

Authors:  R Behrens; G Dietze
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation.

Authors:  M Båth; L G Månsson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  A study of dose reduction using digital luminescence radiography for lateral skull radiography.

Authors:  H Seifert; R Kubale; T Hagen; B Kramann; H K Leetz
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Strategies for dose reduction in ordinary radiographic examinations using CR and DR.

Authors:  C E Willis
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-10

6.  Radiography of facial trauma, the lateral view is not required.

Authors:  N Raby; D Moore
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  A comparison of two or three radiographic views in the diagnosis of skull fractures.

Authors:  I McGlinchey; M F Fleet; F C Eatock; N D Raby
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 8.  Radiation protection.

Authors:  Joyce Helena Brusin
Journal:  Radiol Technol       Date:  2007 May-Jun

9.  Comparative evaluation of digital radiography versus conventional radiography of fractured skulls.

Authors:  H J Langen; H M Klein; B Wein; A Stargardt; R W Günther
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 6.016

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  A Randomized Controlled Trial about the Levels of Radiation Exposure Depends on the Use of Collimation C-arm Fluoroscopic-guided Medial Branch Block.

Authors:  Seung Woo Baek; Jae Sung Ryu; Cheol Hee Jung; Joo Han Lee; Won Kyoung Kwon; Nam Sik Woo; Hae Kyoung Kim; Jae Hun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2013-04-03

2.  The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room.

Authors:  Jae Sung Ryu; Seung Woo Baek; Cheol Hee Jung; Suk Ju Cho; Eu Gene Jung; Hae Kyoung Kim; Jae Hun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2013-04-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.