Literature DB >> 10489180

The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Typical patient radiation doses in diagnostic radiology.

R A Parry1, S A Glaze, B R Archer.   

Abstract

Factors affecting patient dose in all x-ray imaging modalities include beam energy, filtration, collimation, patient size, and image processing. In conventional radiography, the most important determinant of acceptable patient dose is use of the highest peak kilovoltage that results in diagnostic images. Digital radiography allows a much wider range of exposures than conventional radiography for producing diagnostic images. However, operators must be aware of the subtle differences in techniques used with digital systems to avoid unnecessary increases in patient dose. Low-dose mammography requires lower ranges of peak kilovoltage; different target materials, filters, and screen-film combinations; special attention to breast thickness, composition, and compression during the study; and different standards for grids, magnification, and optical density. Although peak kilovoltage and tube current are important for controlling patient dose in fluoroscopy, collimation, source-to-skin and patient-to-image intensifier distances, and control of beam-on time have perhaps greater importance. Computed tomography (CT) involves greater patient dose than conventional radiography, and, although the primary radiation dose is delivered to smaller volumes, dose calculations must account for dose received by adjacent tissue sections. Many variables are involved in fetal exposure and fetal dose effects, but a solid understanding of them can help in developing responsible patient management practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10489180     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.19.5.g99se211289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  27 in total

1.  Strict X-ray beam collimation for facial bones examination can increase lens exposure.

Authors:  R Powys; J Robinson; P L Kench; J Ryan; P C Brennan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Risks to the fetus from diagnostic imaging during pregnancy: review and proposal of a clinical protocol.

Authors:  Mafalda Gomes; Alexandra Matias; Filipe Macedo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-08-14

3.  Whole body imaging in the diagnosis of blunt trauma, ionizing radiation hazards and residual risk.

Authors:  J P Kepros; R C Opreanu; R Samaraweera; A Briningstool; C A Morrison; B D Mosher; P Schneider; P Stevens
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Cecal volvulus in pregnancy: report of a case and review of the safety and utility of medical diagnostic imaging in the assessment of the acute abdomen during pregnancy.

Authors:  Brian A Hogan; Carl J Brown; Jacqueline A Brown
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2007-07-03

Review 5.  Mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke in pregnancy.

Authors:  Saminderjit Kular; Ramya Ram; Vartan Balian; George Tse; Stuart Coley; Shenaaz Jivraj; Sanjoy Nagaraja
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2020-01-27

6.  Chest Computed Tomographic Image Screening for Cystic Lung Diseases in Patients with Spontaneous Pneumothorax Is Cost Effective.

Authors:  Nishant Gupta; Dale Langenderfer; Francis X McCormack; Daniel P Schauer; Mark H Eckman
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2017-01

7.  Computed tomographic colonography: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2003-10-01

8.  Computed Tomographic (CT) Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-09-01

9.  Estimates of Patient Radiation Doses in Digital Radiography Using DICOM Information at a Large Teaching Hospital in Oman.

Authors:  Ibrahim I Suliman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 10.  "Doctor, will that x-ray harm my unborn child?".

Authors:  Savithiri Ratnapalan; Yedidia Bentur; Gideon Koren
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.