Literature DB >> 30141102

Predicting ligand binding affinity using on- and off-rates for the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge.

Tom Dixon1,2, Samuel D Lotz1, Alex Dickson3,4.   

Abstract

Interest in ligand binding kinetics has been growing rapidly, as it is being discovered in more and more systems that ligand residence time is the crucial factor governing drug efficacy. Many enhanced sampling methods have been developed with the goal of predicting ligand binding rates ([Formula: see text]) and/or ligand unbinding rates ([Formula: see text]) through explicit simulation of ligand binding pathways, and these methods work by very different mechanisms. Although there is not yet a blind challenge for ligand binding kinetics, here we take advantage of experimental measurements and rigorously computed benchmarks to compare estimates of [Formula: see text] calculated as the ratio of two rates: [Formula: see text]. These rates were determined using a new enhanced sampling method based on the weighted ensemble framework that we call "REVO": Reweighting of Ensembles by Variance Optimization. This is a further development of the WExplore enhanced sampling method, in which trajectory cloning and merging steps are guided not by the definition of sampling regions, but by maximizing trajectory variance. Here we obtain estimates of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] that are consistent across multiple simulations, with an average log10-scale standard deviation of 0.28 for on-rates and 0.56 for off-rates, which is well within an order of magnitude and far better than previously observed for previous applications of the WExplore algorithm. Our rank ordering of the three host-guest pairs agrees with the reference calculations, however our predicted [Formula: see text] values were systematically lower than the reference by an average of 4.2 kcal/mol. Using tree network visualizations of the trajectories in the REVO algorithm, and conformation space networks for each system, we analyze the results of our sampling, and hypothesize sources of discrepancy between our [Formula: see text] values and the reference. We also motivate the direct inclusion of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] challenges in future iterations of SAMPL, to further develop the field of ligand binding kinetics prediction and modeling.

Keywords:  Binding affinity; Kinetics; Molecular dynamics; REVO; Rare events; SAMPL6; WExplore; Weighted ensemble

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30141102      PMCID: PMC8299730          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-018-0149-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  32 in total

1.  Cucurbit[8]uril mediated donor-acceptor ternary complexes: a model system for studying charge-transfer interactions.

Authors:  Frank Biedermann; Oren A Scherman
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Flow-Dependent Unfolding and Refolding of an RNA by Nonequilibrium Umbrella Sampling.

Authors:  Alex Dickson; Mark Maienschein-Cline; Allison Tovo-Dwyer; Jeff R Hammond; Aaron R Dinner
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 3.  The drug-target residence time model: a 10-year retrospective.

Authors:  Robert A Copeland
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Complete reconstruction of an enzyme-inhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Ignasi Buch; Toni Giorgino; Gianni De Fabritiis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Kinetics of Ligand Binding Through Advanced Computational Approaches: A Review.

Authors:  Alex Dickson; Pratyush Tiwary; Harish Vashisth
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Multiple Ligand Unbinding Pathways and Ligand-Induced Destabilization Revealed by WExplore.

Authors:  Alex Dickson; Samuel D Lotz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Blind prediction of host-guest binding affinities: a new SAMPL3 challenge.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; C Daniel Varnado; Christopher W Bielawski; Adam R Urbach; Lyle Isaacs; Matthew T Geballe; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Unbiased Molecular Dynamics of 11 min Timescale Drug Unbinding Reveals Transition State Stabilizing Interactions.

Authors:  Samuel D Lotz; Alex Dickson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  How and when does an anticancer drug leave its binding site?

Authors:  Pratyush Tiwary; Jagannath Mondal; B J Berne
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Simultaneous Computation of Dynamical and Equilibrium Information Using a Weighted Ensemble of Trajectories.

Authors:  Ernesto Suárez; Steven Lettieri; Matthew C Zwier; Carsen A Stringer; Sundar Raman Subramanian; Lillian T Chong; Daniel M Zuckerman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  13 in total

1.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Adaptive Markov state model estimation using short reseeding trajectories.

Authors:  Hongbin Wan; Vincent A Voelz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Creating Maps of the Ligand Binding Landscape for Kinetics-Based Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tom Dixon; Samuel D Lotz; Alex Dickson
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Gaussian-Accelerated Molecular Dynamics with the Weighted Ensemble Method: A Hybrid Method Improves Thermodynamic and Kinetic Sampling.

Authors:  Surl-Hee Ahn; Anupam A Ojha; Rommie E Amaro; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  SAMPL7 blind challenge: quantum-mechanical prediction of partition coefficients and acid dissociation constants for small drug-like molecules.

Authors:  Basak Koca Fındık; Zeynep Pinar Haslak; Evrim Arslan; Viktorya Aviyente
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Mapping the Ligand Binding Landscape.

Authors:  Alex Dickson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Machine Learning Analysis of τRAMD Trajectories to Decipher Molecular Determinants of Drug-Target Residence Times.

Authors:  Daria B Kokh; Tom Kaufmann; Bastian Kister; Rebecca C Wade
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2019-05-24

8.  Qualitative Prediction of Ligand Dissociation Kinetics from Focal Adhesion Kinase Using Steered Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Justin Spiriti; Chung F Wong
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-20

9.  Membrane-Mediated Ligand Unbinding of the PK-11195 Ligand from TSPO.

Authors:  Tom Dixon; Arzu Uyar; Shelagh Ferguson-Miller; Alex Dickson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  SAMPL7: Host-guest binding prediction by molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics.

Authors:  Yiğitcan Eken; Nuno M S Almeida; Cong Wang; Angela K Wilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.