Literature DB >> 12672731

Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.

David R Flum1, E Patchen Dellinger, Allen Cheadle, Leighton Chan, Thomas Koepsell.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) may decrease the risk of common bile duct (CBD) injury during cholecystectomy by helping to avoid misidentification of the CBD.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the relationship of IOC use and CBD injury while controlling for patient and surgeon characteristics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective nationwide cohort analysis of Medicare patients undergoing cholecystectomy from January 1, 1992, to December 31, 1999. Patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes from the Medicare Part B depository. Common bile duct injury was defined by a second surgical procedure to repair the CBD injury within 1 year of cholecystectomy. Surgeon demographic features were obtained from matching the Medicare Part B data to the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Frequency of CBD injury in patients who did and did not have IOC performed during cholecystectomy, controlling for patient-level (age, sex, race, and case complexity) and surgeon-level (surgeon's age, sex, race, year of surgical procedure, case order, percentage of IOC use in prior surgical procedures, years in medical practice, board certification, and specialization) factors.
RESULTS: The database search identified 1 570 361 cholecystectomies and 7911 CBD injuries (0.5%). Common bile duct injury was found in 2380 (0.39%) of 613 706 patients undergoing cholecystectomy with IOC and in 5531 (0.58%) of 956 655 patients undergoing cholecystectomy without IOC (unadjusted relative risk, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-1.57). After controlling for patient-level factors and surgeon-level factors, the risk of injury was increased when IOC was not used (adjusted relative risk, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-2.28). While surgeons performing IOCs routinely had a lower rate of CBD injuries than those who did not, this difference disappeared when IOC was not used.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study of Medicare patients undergoing cholecystectomy in the 1990s, the risk of CBD injury was significantly higher when IOC was not used. Although IOCs may not prevent all CBD injuries, this study suggests that the routine use of IOC may decrease the rate of CBD injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12672731     DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.13.1639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  129 in total

1.  Intraoperative cholangiography in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era: why are we still debating?

Authors:  F Ausania; L R Holmes; F Ausania; S Iype; P Ricci; S A White
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Identification of anomolous biliary anatomy using near-infrared cholangiography.

Authors:  Danny A Sherwinter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  How should single-access or natural orifice cholecystectomy be introduced?

Authors:  Saxon J Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Medicolegal claims and intra-operative cholangiography.

Authors:  James Manson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  A safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy depends upon the establishment of a critical view of safety.

Authors:  Yuichi Yamashita; Taizo Kimura; Sumio Matsumoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Medicolegal claims following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the UK and Ireland.

Authors:  James R H Scurr; Julian R Brigstocke; David A Shields; John H Scurr
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Optimal surgical technique, use of intra-operative cholangiography (IOC), and management of acute gallbladder disease: the results of a nation-wide survey in the UK and Ireland.

Authors:  P Sanjay; C Kulli; F M Polignano; I S Tait
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Major bile duct injury requiring operative reconstruction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a follow-on study.

Authors:  Patrick J Worth; Taranjeet Kaur; Brian S Diggs; Brett C Sheppard; John G Hunter; James P Dolan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Increasing bile duct injury and decreasing utilization of intraoperative cholangiogram and common bile duct exploration over 14 years: an analysis of outcomes in New York State.

Authors:  Maria S Altieri; Jie Yang; Nabeel Obeid; Chencan Zhu; Mark Talamini; Aurora Pryor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.