Literature DB >> 27023218

Routine ultrasound and blood tests after laparoscopic cholecystectomy-are they worthwhile? A diagnostic accuracy study.

Julius Pochhammer1, Gunnar Blumenstock2, Michael Schäffer3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Delayed recognition of complications can have life-threatening sequelae and is a leading cause of medical litigation. Minimal evidence exists for benefits of postoperative surveillance. This study investigated whether ultrasound (US) and blood tests can detect complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: A series of 772 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed between February 2008 and October 2009 was retrospectively analyzed. Routine US was performed within 6 h postoperatively, and a blood sample was taken at the second postoperative day.
RESULTS: Postoperative US was performed in 722 patients. Fluid accumulation was documented in 104 patients; only two of these patients had clinically significant findings requiring treatment. The best predictor of infectious complications was elevated postoperative C-reactive protein (≥123 mg/L), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 and a number needed to misdiagnose (NNM) of 8.7. To predict postoperative choledocholithiasis, a combination of total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase elevations, with cutoff values of 1.3 mg/dL, 37 IU/L, and 136 IU/L, respectively, attained the highest accuracy with a NNM of 29.5. Ultrasonographic detection of bile duct dilation further improved specificity, while lowering sensitivity.
CONCLUSIONS: The value of early routine postoperative US is low, unless there is clinical suspicion of complications. Routine blood tests have a high sensitivity for infectious complications and a high specificity for remnant biliary duct stones. Therefore, we recommend avoiding routine US postoperatively and performing routine postoperative blood tests. We also recommend facilitating easy access to postoperative US, as it can aid the decision to take therapeutic measures in symptomatic patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood test; Complication; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Postoperative surveillance; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27023218     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-016-1411-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  20 in total

1.  Timing and nature of presentation of unsuspected retained common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Michael R Cox; Joel P O Budge; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The role of ERCP in management of retained bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Suhail Anwar; Romana Rahim; Anselm Agwunobi; John Bancewicz
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2004-10-08

3.  Medicolegal claims following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the UK and Ireland.

Authors:  James R H Scurr; Julian R Brigstocke; David A Shields; John H Scurr
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Prediction of which patients with an abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram will have a confirmed stone at ERCP.

Authors:  Matthew P Spinn; David S Wolf; Dharmendra Verma; Frank J Lukens
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Utility of liver function tests after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Amy Kaldor; Gabriel Akopian; James Recabaren; Magdi Alexander
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Confidence intervals vs significance tests: quantitative interpretation.

Authors:  J L Fleiss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  15 years of litigation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England.

Authors:  Bilal Alkhaffaf; Bart Decadt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  [S3-guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of gallstones. German Society for Digestive and Metabolic Diseases and German Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract].

Authors:  F Lammert; M W Neubrand; R Bittner; H Feussner; L Greiner; F Hagenmüller; K H Kiehne; K Ludwig; H Neuhaus; G Paumgartner; J F Riemann; T Sauerbruch
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Ultrasound findings following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N B Wright; V C Williamson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  C-reactive protein as early predictor for infectious postoperative complications in rectal surgery.

Authors:  T Welsch; S A Müller; A Ulrich; A Kischlat; U Hinz; P Kienle; M W Büchler; J Schmidt; B M Schmied
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.