Literature DB >> 25398193

Timing and nature of presentation of unsuspected retained common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study.

Michael R Cox1, Joel P O Budge, Guy D Eslick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Common bile duct (CBD) stones may be over looked at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), particularly when intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) is not performed. Currently, there is no data available about the time course and pattern of presentation for stones retained in the CBD at the time of LC. The aim of this study was to establish the time course and pattern of presentation of unsuspected retained CBD stones post LC.
METHODS: Patients presenting with symptomatic CBD stones from 1994 until 2010, having previously undergone LC were studied in this retrospective, case note review. CBD stones were confirmed at ERCP. Data collected included LC date, mode of presentation, imaging results including CBD diameter, stone appearance, length of stay and post ERCP complications. Patients having an ERCP for stones found on IOC at LC were excluded.
RESULTS: Sixty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. The most common mode of presentation was abdominal pain (n = 38, 62%) with (17) or without (21) deranged liver function tests. Nineteen (31%) patients presented with clinical complications of the CBD stones: cholangitis (10), acute biliary pancreatitis (6) or obstructive jaundice (3). The CBD was usually mild-to-moderately dilated (8-15 mm) on ultrasound. The median time span from LC to presentation with CBD stones was 4 years (range: 6 days-18 years). Five (8.2%) patients had a complication from their ERCP; mild pancreatitis (3), bleed (1) and cholangitis (1). Nineteen (31.1%) patients required more than one ERCP to complete stone/stent removal.
CONCLUSIONS: The median time for patients to present with symptomatic CBD stones after LC is 4 years. Patients with retrained stones may remain asymptomatic for many years. A third of the patients presented with potentially serious complications of the retained CBD stone. Future studies for CBD stones after LC need to follow patients for at least 10 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25398193     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3907-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

1.  Routine versus selective intra-operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N J Soper; D L Dunnegan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Systematic review of intraoperative cholangiography in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J A Ford; M Soop; J Du; B P T Loveday; M Rodgers
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  To 'gram or not'? Indications for intraoperative cholangiogram.

Authors:  Lawrence E Tabone; Sharfi Sarker; Piero M Fisichella; Molly Conlon; Emil Fernando; Sophia Yi; Fred A Luchette
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Value of routine intraoperative cholangiography in detecting aberrant bile ducts and bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E Kullman; K Borch; E Lindström; J Svanvik; B Anderberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Results of a change to routine fluorocholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D B Jones; D L Dunnegan; N J Soper
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intraoperative findings and postoperative complications.

Authors:  G Bonatsos; E Leandros; N Dourakis; C Birbas; G Delibaltadakis; B Golematis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Prospective evaluation of a selective approach to cholangiography for suspected common bile duct stones.

Authors:  James Horwood; Fayaz Akbar; Katherine Davis; Richard Morgan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Randomized clinical trial of routine on-table cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  O A Khan; S Balaji; G Branagan; D H Bennett; N Davies
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  A randomised trial of selective or routine on-table cholangiography.

Authors:  A K Sharma; R Cherry; J W Fielding
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Natural history of asymptomatic bile duct stones at time of cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G R Caddy; J Kirby; S J Kirk; M J Allen; R J Moorehead; T C Tham
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2005-09
View more
  8 in total

1.  Risk factors for the late development of common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yoo Shin Choi; Jae Hyuk Do; Suk Won Suh; Seung Eun Lee; Hyun Kang; Hyun Jeong Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Routine ultrasound and blood tests after laparoscopic cholecystectomy-are they worthwhile? A diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Julius Pochhammer; Gunnar Blumenstock; Michael Schäffer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Cost effectiveness of intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasound for suspected choledocholithiasis; outcomes from a specialist benign upper gastrointestinal unit.

Authors:  S Donoghue; R M Jones; A Bush; G Srinivas; K Bowling; S Andrews
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Who experiences endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone disease?

Authors:  Bum-Soo Kim; Sun-Hyung Joo; Sungsin Cho; Min-Soo Han
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 1.859

5.  Prevalence and characteristics of clinically significant retained common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Authors:  Doo-Ho Lee; Young Joon Ahn; Hae Won Lee; Jung Kee Chung; In Mok Jung
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 1.859

6.  Acute biliary pancreatitis in cholecystectomised patients.

Authors:  Fatih Ciftci; Turgut Anuk
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2017-05-10

7.  Routine Cysticotomy and Flushing of the Cystic Duct in Patients with Low Risk of Common Duct Stones: Can It Be Beneficial?

Authors:  Piera Leon; Fabiola Giudici; Antonio Sciuto; Francesco Corcione
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2017-07-11

Review 8.  A meta-analysis of the use of intraoperative cholangiography; time to revisit our approach to cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Eoin Donnellan; Jonathan Coulter; Cherian Mathew; Michelle Choynowski; Louise Flanagan; Magda Bucholc; Alison Johnston; Michael Sugrue
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2020-08-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.