Literature DB >> 29196867

Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature.

Farshid Amirabdollahian1, Salvatore Livatino2, Behrad Vahedi2, Radhika Gudipati3, Patrick Sheen2, Shan Gawrie-Mohan4, Nikhil Vasdev5,6.   

Abstract

With the successful uptake and inclusion of robotic systems in minimally invasive surgery and with the increasing application of robotic surgery (RS) in numerous surgical specialities worldwide, there is now a need to develop and enhance the technology further. One such improvement is the implementation and amalgamation of haptic feedback technology into RS which will permit the operating surgeon on the console to receive haptic information on the type of tissue being operated on. The main advantage of using this is to allow the operating surgeon to feel and control the amount of force applied to different tissues during surgery thus minimising the risk of tissue damage due to both the direct and indirect effects of excessive tissue force or tension being applied during RS. We performed a two-rater systematic review to identify the latest developments and potential avenues of improving technology in the application and implementation of haptic feedback technology to the operating surgeon on the console during RS. This review provides a summary of technological enhancements in RS, considering different stages of work, from proof of concept to cadaver tissue testing, surgery in animals, and finally real implementation in surgical practice. We identify that at the time of this review, while there is a unanimous agreement regarding need for haptic and tactile feedback, there are no solutions or products available that address this need. There is a scope and need for new developments in haptic augmentation for robot-mediated surgery with the aim of improving patient care and robotic surgical technology further.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Haptics; Robotic surgery; Tactile enhancement; Touch augmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29196867     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0763-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  147 in total

1.  Design of a force-reflective master robot for haptic telesurgery applications: RoboMaster1.

Authors:  Mostafa Hadavand; Alireza Mirbagheri; Hasan Salarieh; Farzam Farahmand
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

2.  Haptic interface for robot-assisted ophthalmic surgery.

Authors:  A Barthel; D Trematerra; M A Nasseri; D Zapp; C P Lohmann; A Knoll; M Maier
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015-08

3.  Load evaluation of the da Vinci surgical system for transoral robotic surgery.

Authors:  Kazunori Fujiwara; Takahiro Fukuhara; Koji Niimi; Takahiro Sato; Hiroya Kitano
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-10-17

4.  Visual clues act as a substitute for haptic feedback in robotic surgery.

Authors:  M E Hagen; J J Meehan; I Inan; P Morel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Cutaneous Feedback of Fingertip Deformation and Vibration for Palpation in Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Claudio Pacchierotti; Domenico Prattichizzo; Katherine J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  [Development of real-world haptic technology].

Authors:  Kouhei Ohnishi; Tomoyuki Shimono; Kenji Natori
Journal:  Gan To Kagaku Ryoho       Date:  2012-07

7.  Quantifying force and positional frequency bands in neurosurgical tasks.

Authors:  Yaser Maddahi; Ahmad Ghasemloonia; Kourosh Zareinia; Nariman Sepehri; Garnette R Sutherland
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-02-25

Review 8.  Robotic surgery in cancer care: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Niloofar Mohammadzadeh; Reza Safdari
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2014

Review 9.  Tactile pattern perception and its perturbations.

Authors:  J C Craig
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Use of robotic technology in cam femoroacetabular impingement corrective surgery.

Authors:  Milad Masjedi; Wei Liang Tan; Sunnar Jaskaranjit; Adeel Aqil; Simon Harris; Justin Cobb
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.547

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  The future of robotic surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Brodie; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Reducing retraction forces with tactile feedback during robotic total mesorectal excision in a porcine model.

Authors:  Yen-Yi Juo; Jake Pensa; Yas Sanaiha; Ahmad Abiri; Songping Sun; Anna Tao; Sandra Duarte Vogel; Kevork Kazanjian; Erik Dutson; Warren Grundfest; Anne Lin
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-11-27

Review 3.  Robotic colorectal surgery and ergonomics.

Authors:  Shing Wai Wong; Zhen Hao Ang; Phillip F Yang; Philip Crowe
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-04-22

Review 4.  Factors affecting the learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Shing Wai Wong; Philip Crowe
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-02-01

5.  The Effect of Haptic Feedback on Efficiency and Safety During Preretinal Membrane Peeling Simulation.

Authors:  Anibal Francone; Jason Mingyi Huang; Ji Ma; Tsu-Chin Tsao; Jacob Rosen; Jean-Pierre Hubschman
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 6.  Tool-tissue forces in surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Aida Kafai Golahmadi; Danyal Z Khan; George P Mylonas; Hani J Marcus
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-31

7.  INFLUENCE OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE LAPAROSCOPIC EXPERIENCE SKILLS ON ROBOTIC SURGERY DEXTERITY.

Authors:  Marcos Belotto; Larissa Coutinho; Adhemar M Pacheco-Jr; Anuar I Mitre; Eduardo Antunes da Fonseca
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-01-05

8.  Visual Haptic Feedback for Training of Robotic Suturing.

Authors:  François Jourdes; Brice Valentin; Jérémie Allard; Christian Duriez; Barbara Seeliger
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-02-02

Review 9.  The Challenges and Perspectives of the Integration Between Virtual and Augmented Reality and Manual Therapies.

Authors:  Francesco Cerritelli; Marco Chiera; Marco Abbro; Valentino Megale; Jorge Esteves; Alberto Gallace; Andrea Manzotti
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 10.  Mixed reality applications in urology: Requirements and future potential.

Authors:  Gerd Reis; Mehmet Yilmaz; Jason Rambach; Alain Pagani; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Arkadiusz Miernik; Paul Lesur; Nareg Minaskan
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.