Literature DB >> 21678013

Enhancement of a master-slave robotic system for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

Zhenglong Sun1, Rui Yee Ang, Ed Wyn Lim, Zheng Wang, Khek Yu Ho, Soo Jay Phee.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A novel robotic platform for Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) is presented in this paper. It aims to tackle two crucial technical barriers which hinder its smooth transition from animal studies to clinical trials: providing effective instrumentations to perform complex NOTES procedures and maintaining the spatial orientation for endoscopic navigation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The technical barriers are overcome by the design of the robotic system considering size, triangulation, dexterity, maneuverability and complexity. It is also shown that haptic feedback and interventional navigation system could solve the problem of off-axis manipulation of the camera angle and loss of spatial orientation upon entering the peritoneal cavity in transgastric NOTES procedure, respectively.
RESULTS: Successful ESD (endoscopic submucosal dissection) and wedge hepatic resection have been performed on live pigs with our Master And Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER) system, showing its capability to perform advanced endoscopic surgical and NOTES procedures. It is found that the MASTER exhibited good grasping and cutting efficiency. And the lesion resection time could be significantly reduced with more practice between the endoscopist and the robot operator.
CONCLUSION: This study evaluates the feasibility of MASTER system as a platform overcoming the barriers to NOTES. It is also demonstrated that the MASTER could effectively mitigate the technical constraints normally encountered in NOTES procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21678013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore        ISSN: 0304-4602            Impact factor:   2.473


  8 in total

Review 1.  Review of surgical robotics user interface: what is the best way to control robotic surgery?

Authors:  Anton Simorov; R Stephen Otte; Courtni M Kopietz; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Application of robotics in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A review.

Authors:  Baldwin Po Man Yeung; Philip Wai Yan Chiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  The future of robotic surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Brodie; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  A state of the art review and categorization of multi-branched instruments for NOTES and SILS.

Authors:  Ewout A Arkenbout; Paul W J Henselmans; Filip Jelínek; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Farshid Amirabdollahian; Salvatore Livatino; Behrad Vahedi; Radhika Gudipati; Patrick Sheen; Shan Gawrie-Mohan; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

6.  A Three-Limb Teleoperated Robotic System with Foot Control for Flexible Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Yanpei Huang; Wenjie Lai; Lin Cao; Jiajun Liu; Xiaoguo Li; Etienne Burdet; Soo Jay Phee
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 7.  Flexible platforms for natural orifice transluminal and endoluminal surgery.

Authors:  Nisha Patel; Carlo Seneci; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi; Julian Teare
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2014-06

Review 8.  Robotic endoscopy. A review of the literature.

Authors:  Thiago Arantes de Carvalho Visconti; José Pinhata Otoch; Everson Luiz de Almeida Artifon
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 1.388

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.