Literature DB >> 29442240

Review of emerging surgical robotic technology.

Brian S Peters1, Priscila R Armijo1, Crystal Krause1, Songita A Choudhury1, Dmitry Oleynikov2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopic and robotic procedures has increased in general surgery. Minimally invasive robotic surgery has made tremendous progress in a relatively short period of time, realizing improvements for both the patient and surgeon. This has led to an increase in the use and development of robotic devices and platforms for general surgery. The purpose of this review is to explore current and emerging surgical robotic technologies in a growing and dynamic environment of research and development.
METHODS: This review explores medical and surgical robotic endoscopic surgery and peripheral technologies currently available or in development. The devices discussed here are specific to general surgery, including laparoscopy, colonoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and thoracoscopy. Benefits and limitations of each technology were identified and applicable future directions were described.
RESULTS: A number of FDA-approved devices and platforms for robotic surgery were reviewed, including the da Vinci Surgical System, Sensei X Robotic Catheter System, FreeHand 1.2, invendoscopy E200 system, Flex® Robotic System, Senhance, ARES, the Single-Port Instrument Delivery Extended Research (SPIDER), and the NeoGuide Colonoscope. Additionally, platforms were reviewed which have not yet obtained FDA approval including MiroSurge, ViaCath System, SPORT™ Surgical System, SurgiBot, Versius Robotic System, Master and Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot, Verb Surgical, Miniature In Vivo Robot, and the Einstein Surgical Robot.
CONCLUSIONS: The use and demand for robotic medical and surgical platforms is increasing and new technologies are continually being developed. New technologies are increasingly implemented to improve on the capabilities of previously established systems. Future studies are needed to further evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each robotic surgical device and platform in the operating suite.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopy; Laparoscopy; Robotic surgery; Robotic-assisted surgery; Surgical robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29442240     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6079-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  53 in total

1.  Comparison of the FreeHand® robotic camera holder with human assistants during endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Toni Franz; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Do Minh; Anja Dietel; James Hicks; Martin Nicolaus; Abdulrahman Al-Aown; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Current and emerging robot-assisted endovascular catheterization technologies: a review.

Authors:  Hedyeh Rafii-Tari; Christopher J Payne; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  The new robotic TELELAP ALF-X in gynecological surgery: single-center experience.

Authors:  Francesco Fanfani; Giorgia Monterossi; Anna Fagotti; Cristiano Rossitto; Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Barbara Costantini; Valerio Gallotta; Luigi Selvaggi; Stefano Restaino; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Flex Robotic System in transoral robotic surgery: The first 40 patients.

Authors:  Stefan Mattheis; Pia Hasskamp; Laura Holtmann; Christina Schäfer; Urban Geisthoff; Nina Dominas; Stephan Lang
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 6.  Advances in laparoscopic surgery in urology.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Dogu Teber
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  What happens while learning robotic lobectomy for lung cancer?

Authors:  Mehmet Oğuzhan Özyurtkan; Erkan Kaba; Alper Toker
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-03-10

Review 8.  Flexible Gastro-intestinal Endoscopy - Clinical Challenges and Technical Achievements.

Authors:  Niehls Kurniawan; Martin Keuchel
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 9.  Minimally invasive (endoscopic-computer assisted) surgery: Technique and review.

Authors:  Anand Kumar; Nirma Yadav; Shipra Singh; Neha Chauhan
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec

10.  The Importance of Trust in the Adoption and Use of Intelligent Assistive Technology by Older Adults to Support Aging in Place: Scoping Review Protocol.

Authors:  Josephine McMurray; Richard Booth; Gillian Strudwick; Cheryl Forchuk; Adam Morse; Jessica Lachance; Arani Baskaran; Lauren Allison
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-11-02
View more
  71 in total

1.  Single-port robotic surgery: the next generation of minimally invasive urology.

Authors:  Ryan W Dobbs; Whitney R Halgrimson; Susan Talamini; Hari T Vigneswaran; Jessica O Wilson; Simone Crivellaro
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education.

Authors:  Richard Chen; Priscila Rodrigues Armijo; Crystal Krause; Ka-Chun Siu; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Assessment of the Versius surgical robotic system for dual-field synchronous transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) in a preclinical model: will tomorrow's surgical robots promise newfound options?

Authors:  S Atallah; E Parra-Davila; A G F Melani
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Deformation modeling based on mechanical properties of liver tissue for virtuanormal vectors of trianglesl surgical simulation.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Ming Hu; Xinge Shi; Deming Zhao; Lingtao Yu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Cost Analysis of Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in a Single Academic Center: How Expensive Is Expensive?

Authors:  Keith King; Alvaro Galvez; Jill Stoltzfus; Leonardo Claros; Maher El Chaar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Direct target NOTES: prospective applications for next generation robotic platforms.

Authors:  S Atallah; A Hodges; S W Larach
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Low confidence levels with the robotic platform among senior surgical residents: simulation training is needed.

Authors:  Francisco Schlottmann; Jason M Long; Sean Brown; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-08-11

Review 8.  The future of robotic surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Brodie; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 9.  Evolution of minimal access breast surgery.

Authors:  Chi Wei Mok; Hung-Wen Lai
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-12

Review 10.  Robotics in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Matthew S Galetta; Joseph D Leider; Srikanth N Divi; Dhruv K C Goyal; Gregory D Schroeder
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.