Literature DB >> 22342128

Patient factors predict periprosthetic fractures after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Jasvinder A Singh1, Matthew R Jensen, David G Lewallen.   

Abstract

We assessed important patient risk factors for postoperative periprosthetic fractures after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using prospectively collected Institutional Joint Registry data. We used univariate and multivariable-adjusted Cox regression analyses. There were 330 postoperative periprosthetic fractures after 6281 revision THAs. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of periprosthetic fracture was higher for women (1.66 [1.32-2.080], P < .001), a higher Deyo-Charlson comorbidity index of 2 (1.46 [1.03-2.07]) and index of 3+ (2.01 [1.48-2.73]; overall, P < .001), and operative diagnosis, especially previous nonunion (5.76 [2.55-13.02]; overall, P < .001). Hazard ratio was lower in patients 61 to 70 years old (0.64 [0.49-0.84]) and 71 to 80 years old (0.57 [0.43-0.76]) compared with those younger than 60 years (overall, P < .0001). Our study identified important modifiable and unmodifiable risk factors for fractures after revision THA. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22342128      PMCID: PMC3360118          DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  30 in total

1.  The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality.

Authors:  R D DRIPPS; A LAMONT; J E ECKENHOFF
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1961-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Hans Lindahl; Göran Garellick; Hans Regnér; Peter Herberts; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Fionna Mowat; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Sports activity after total hip and knee arthroplasty : specific recommendations concerning tennis.

Authors:  Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont; Phillip S Ragland; Munaf M Kachwala; Ronald E Delanois
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Sports activities 5 years after total knee or hip arthroplasty: the Ulm Osteoarthritis Study.

Authors:  K Huch; K A C Müller; T Stürmer; H Brenner; W Puhl; K-P Günther
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Differences in outcomes of obese women and men undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anne Lübbeke; Richard Stern; Guido Garavaglia; Line Zurcher; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-03-15

7.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Hans Lindahl; Henrik Malchau; Peter Herberts; Göran Garellick
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Total hip replacement in patients eighty years of age and older.

Authors:  Daisuke Ogino; Hiroyuki Kawaji; Liisa Konttinen; Matti Lehto; Pekka Rantanen; Antti Malmivaara; Yrjö T Konttinen; Jari Salo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Functional outcome of femoral peri prosthetic fracture and revision hip arthroplasty: a matched-pair study from the New Zealand Registry.

Authors:  Simon W Young; Cameron G Walker; Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur.

Authors:  Timothy Bhattacharyya; Denis Chang; James B Meigs; Daniel M Estok; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Incidence and predisposing factors of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures: a literature review.

Authors:  Claudia C Sidler-Maier; James P Waddell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Periprosthetic joint infection is the main reason for failure in patients following periprosthetic fracture treated with revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Janna van den Kieboom; Venkatsaiakhil Tirumala; Liang Xiong; Christian Klemt; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Prevalence and risk factors for intra-operative periprosthetic fractures in one thousand eight hundred and seventy two patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Walter Ricioli; Marcelo Cavalheiro Queiroz; Rodrigo Pereira Guimarães; Emerson K Honda; Giancarlo Polesello; Patricia M de Moraes Barros Fucs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Underlying diagnosis predicts patient-reported outcomes after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Reconstructed the bone stock after femoral bone loss in Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures using cortical strut allograft and impacted cancellous allograft.

Authors:  Donghai Li; Qinsheng Hu; Pengde Kang; Jing Yang; Zongke Zhou; Bin Shen; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Management, outcome, and novel classification system of periprosthetic fractures in patients with transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS)-a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Marcus Örgel; Maximilian Petri; Alexander Ranker; Nils Wirries; Tilman Graulich; Christian Krettek; Marcel Winkelmann; Horst-Heinrich Aschoff
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  Factors affecting the incidence of postoperative periprosthetic fractures following primary and revision hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christos Bissias; Angelos Kaspiris; Athanasios Kalogeropoulos; Konstantinos Papoutsis; Nikolaos Natsioulas; Konstantinos Barbagiannis; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Olga D Savvidou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures after femoral revision using a long stem.

Authors:  Youngwoo Kim; Chiaki Tanaka; Hiroshi Tada; Hiroshi Kanoe; Takaaki Shirai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Operative diagnosis for revision total hip arthroplasty is associated with patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David G Lewallen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Periprosthetic Femur Fracture Occuring after Contralateral Neglected Femoral Neck Fracture.

Authors:  Deniz Cankaya; Ali Toprak; Enver IKilic; Olgun Bingol; Yalcin Tabak
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.